From: "Alain Péan" <alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr>
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Edit: Boot Order mask
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:15:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da7f1512-5fa6-1bb4-a878-7035f8100454@c2n.upsaclay.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c3d06aa-1bf8-ca1b-e826-3d2615685b9d@riminilug.it>
Le 14/04/2021 à 09:37, Piviul a écrit :
> I Alain, first of all thank you very much indeed to you and to all
> people answered this thread. I reply your message but the infos here
> should answer even the infos asked from Alwin...
>
> I send directly the output differences from the command pveversion
> with -v flag because all three nodes show the same
> "pve-manager/6.3-6/2184247e (running kernel: 5.4.106-1-pve)" version.
>
> So I have launched the following command in all three nodes:
>
> # pveversion -v > pveversion.$(hostname)
>
> obtaining 3 differents files and I've done the diff between the first
> two files (referring to pve01 and pve02) and as expected there is no
> difference:
>
> $ diff pveversion.pve0{1,2}
>
> Then I have done the diff between the first and the third node and
> this is the result:
>
> $ diff pveversion.pve0{1,3}
> 5d4
> < pve-kernel-5.3: 6.1-6
> 8,9c7
> < pve-kernel-5.3.18-3-pve: 5.3.18-3
> < pve-kernel-5.3.10-1-pve: 5.3.10-1
> ---
> > pve-kernel-5.4.34-1-pve: 5.4.34-2
>
> there are some little differences yes but in kernel that are not in
> use any more (in all 3 nodes uname -r shows 5.4.106-1-pve)...
>
> Attached you can find all three files hoping the system doesn't cut them.
>
> Please can I ask you if you have a 6.3 node in your installations that
> was previously in 6.2 version (i.e. not installed directly in 6.3
> version)? Can you tell me if the "Boot order" musk is the one with
> only combo boxes or the more evoluted drag and drop musk?
Hi Piviul,
I don't think only a difference in kernel could explain this difference
in the web interface, if the other packages are the same. Did you try to
clear the cache in your web browsers ?
The attached files are indeed there. I looked at the versions, and all
three appears up to date, so for me, the only origin that I can suppose
could be the browser cache.
Alain
--
Administrateur Système/Réseau
C2N Centre de Nanosciences et Nanotechnologies (UMR 9001)
Boulevard Thomas Gobert (ex Avenue de La Vauve), 91120 Palaiseau
Tel : 01-70-27-06-88 Bureau A255
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-13 8:05 Piviul
2021-04-13 8:57 ` Alain Péan
2021-04-14 7:37 ` Piviul
2021-04-14 16:15 ` Alain Péan [this message]
2021-04-15 14:03 ` Piviul
2021-04-16 14:16 ` Piviul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da7f1512-5fa6-1bb4-a878-7035f8100454@c2n.upsaclay.fr \
--to=alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr \
--cc=pve-user@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.