all lists on lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PVE-User] PowerEdge R440 & watchdog timer
@ 2022-04-15 14:02 Сергей Цаболов
       [not found] ` <mailman.275.1650032197.377.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Сергей Цаболов @ 2022-04-15 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Proxmox VE user list

Hi to all,

I have the  6 node Proxmox VE cluster + Ceph installed (all node is 
PowerEdge R440)

Need I Configure Hardware Watchdog / IPMI Fencing ?

I'm a little confused do I need to do something in this direction or not?


Sergey TS
The best Regard
______________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
From mir@miras.org  Fri Apr 15 16:16:36 2022
Return-Path: <mir@miras.org>
X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3F29D463
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:16:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B682C48B9
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:16:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.datanom.eu (mail.datanom.eu [188.166.46.182])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id EE8FE48A8
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:16:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.datanom.net (83-93-223-153-cable.dk.customer.tdc.net
 [83.93.223.153])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.datanom.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CC9D4030F
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.datanom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DDD120ED6
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:56 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=miras.org; h=
 content-type:content-type:mime-version:x-mailer:references
 :in-reply-to:message-id:subject:subject:to:from:from:date:date;
 s=dkim; t=1650032156; x=1650896157; bh=ngkAMoai5woyCgUPF36OxO9Q
 pbxUmTWUlIXZg8P5G+I=; b=Yl3Peg440FZZTmq8oE59boGM6p2qewl/ZwXu06vE
 IlBeDXjL/Qi2LTdgwKMYQL29bjFEWSXoZxh43fZDdc0IxWY8FDsD5JJr8w25DDvd
 LepzbUGFZcgaJMYCIplsCWNV/+xZP5lbcMCXwED8bbXRS8Oo0CXglCynDbrsEWLi
 GC0=
X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - iredmail.datanom.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at iredmail.datanom.net
Received: from mail.datanom.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (iredmail.datanom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 8hTfnZRGWXdk for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>;
 Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sleipner.datanom.net (unknown [192.168.2.79])
 by mail.datanom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8281A120D96
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:56 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:57 +0200
From: Michael Rasmussen <mir@miras.org>
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PowerEdge R440 & watchdog timer
Message-ID: <20220415161557.677231fd@sleipner.datanom.net>
In-Reply-To: <d22938b2-3656-3e7f-b2b7-845f2aaf6056@t8.ru>
References: <d22938b2-3656-3e7f-b2b7-845f2aaf6056@t8.ru>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0git4 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-GPG-KEY: ftp://ftp.datanom.net/pub/claws/gpg-key.txt
X-Face: +UpSPFkh3^t&rI|{Ou$3/l]vjTk; D5c0k; *3p?O2c+:bV#y*0q4EWQ[Kdd2=;
 <u7g2~aE~I k%*K{!Q#D)Vaiiqy~hxUz_8)mTt:m#WPV$ls:"s,.;p7SNdq>PR}nK
Face: 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
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/HM.xNXg7W49pAttcbLc/aDh";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.858 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:16:36 -0000

--Sig_/HM.xNXg7W49pAttcbLc/aDh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 17:02:13 +0300
=D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=A6=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=BE=
=D0=B2 <tsabolov@t8.ru> wrote:

>=20
> Need I Configure Hardware Watchdog / IPMI Fencing ?
>=20
> I'm a little confused do I need to do something in this direction or
> not?
>=20
The software watchdog comes configured out of the box and with fencing
etc. and works extremely well. I would bother configuring the hardware
watchdog.

--=20
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
/usr/games/fortune -es says:
Keep out of the sunlight.

--Sig_/HM.xNXg7W49pAttcbLc/aDh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEX3FAW1ccuO4qQUpPx3wR4EmgbmYFAmJZfh0ACgkQx3wR4Emg
bmYpbgf+Id4WkkNRm3kZyu+i2NkwjAUHnQ8nIqi0cFCWV15A6Gsl1o5uB5lbzoSn
kQdd2ekTXhgvkW1LlvQY3ts5WJKeCBzhN2GpkK8ZCiHxnF/o/+sLEJRWXaD96Hzr
CWti9N7WlNjRURSrnMt701PABnX5Up1sgZ5tpyX7Mz0wI72K/5UEYaDBPASBWpiP
KwpPzqBOFs20kqv2oUZdeqe1oy2BXbFKcjmhwPOipINvD5j4boPBYuAUPIGoLeHz
WWq4r/Ozgge/MIQ5lw6ebqo36ivyYkL+VepxVldhtMhlsMTZBzbKyYQWMgHKSYbH
qIDSNyVyRcZgbHZ1/I+Lja0D2GvE9w==
=ii/l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/HM.xNXg7W49pAttcbLc/aDh--



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PVE-User] PowerEdge R440 & watchdog timer
       [not found]   ` <mailman.276.1650032585.377.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
@ 2022-04-15 14:48     ` Сергей Цаболов
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Сергей Цаболов @ 2022-04-15 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Proxmox VE user list

Thanks for answers,

I understand the configure hardware watchdog is not the best way.

How I can change the Timer  when the 1 node from the cluster lost 
connectivity ( shutdown the switch)  go the reboot ?

Is possible change the timer ?



15.04.2022 17:23, Michael Rasmussen via pve-user пишет:
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
Sergey TS
The best Regard
______________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
From mir@miras.org  Fri Apr 15 18:01:01 2022
Return-Path: <mir@miras.org>
X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1E71D461
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:01:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8DD836353
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.datanom.eu (mail.datanom.eu [188.166.46.182])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id AAF7C6344
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.datanom.net (83-93-223-153-cable.dk.customer.tdc.net
 [83.93.223.153])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.datanom.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 138574030F
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.datanom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFF3120ED7
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:28 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=miras.org; h=
 content-type:content-type:mime-version:x-mailer:references
 :in-reply-to:message-id:subject:subject:to:from:from:date:date;
 s=dkim; t=1650038428; x=1650902429; bh=nLCnUhOt/iW0crQO4/tMJmHS
 3TQRZyYDi+rePzXNtM0=; b=QbjRhuE44tF+oZZIbYLJ1sVE9vVgUveftAhp0SFc
 wF2v1q7bdrR17KZBfplW2EApLm+UXFKGJcMJc9dGLHAyXaHeImj7K3T55ApcKLJB
 YQpAl1QyL4qlX2+O/1eGAjowMFKNsKjrRiQoo9spzeO6h5/vFM9mX6MhH9bijGvS
 VQ0=
X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - iredmail.datanom.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at iredmail.datanom.net
Received: from mail.datanom.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (iredmail.datanom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id ZhZhrsAdMZMm for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>;
 Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sleipner.datanom.net (unknown [192.168.2.79])
 by mail.datanom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC47A120D96
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:26 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:27 +0200
From: Michael Rasmussen <mir@miras.org>
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PowerEdge R440 & watchdog timer
Message-ID: <20220415180027.7d25dc74@sleipner.datanom.net>
In-Reply-To: <cd411741-224a-3b0e-7aa0-7415146bfcd9@t8.ru>
References: <d22938b2-3656-3e7f-b2b7-845f2aaf6056@t8.ru>
 <mailman.275.1650032197.377.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 <mailman.276.1650032585.377.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 <746cb313-1ee4-8481-6904-a261634202e9@t8.ru>
 <20220415165642.0e5b20cb@sleipner.datanom.net>
 <cd411741-224a-3b0e-7aa0-7415146bfcd9@t8.ru>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0git4 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-GPG-KEY: ftp://ftp.datanom.net/pub/claws/gpg-key.txt
X-Face: +UpSPFkh3^t&rI|{Ou$3/l]vjTk; D5c0k; *3p?O2c+:bV#y*0q4EWQ[Kdd2=;
 <u7g2~aE~I k%*K{!Q#D)Vaiiqy~hxUz_8)mTt:m#WPV$ls:"s,.;p7SNdq>PR}nK
Face: 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
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/=NFLv9desMWs7E8p+K+nggT";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.686 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain
 KAM_SHORT               0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:01:01 -0000

--Sig_/=NFLv9desMWs7E8p+K+nggT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:17:26 +0300
=D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=A6=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=BE=
=D0=B2 <tsabolov@t8.ru> wrote:

> Thank you for answer.
>=20
> Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that the timeout value is quite
> small.
>=20
> If node lost connection after 2 min is go to reboot is good
> practices, I won't argue with you, maybe you're right.
>=20

For the last 10 years I have been using Proxmox I have not have a lost
connection to a server for over 1 sec without it being intentionally
but if your circumstances is another usecase I would go for stackable
switches I have a port for either switch connected to my servers and
UPS control for all my servers.

Loosing connection to a server for more than 1 sec can only mean
hardware failure or loss of power.

>=20
> 15.04.2022 17:56, Michael Rasmussen =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
> > On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 17:48:12 +0300
> > =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=A6=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=
=BE=D0=B2<tsabolov@t8.ru>  wrote:
> > =20
> >> Is possible change the timer ?
> >> =20
> > AFAIK this requires changes to the watchdog code. To the best of my
> > knowledge the timeout is configured according to best practices.
> >
> > Why do you want to change the timeout value?
> > =20
> =D0=A1 =D1=83=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=B6=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BC
> =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=A6=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=BE=
=D0=B2
> =D0=A1=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BC=D0=BD=D1=8B=D0=B9 =D0=90=D0=B4=D0=BC=
=D0=B8=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=82=D1=80=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=BE=D1=80 =D0=9E=D0=9E=
=D0=9E "=D0=A28"
> =D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BB.: +74992716161
> =D0=9C=D0=BE=D0=B1: +79850334875
> logo_T8rus <https://t8.ru>
>=20
> tsabolov@t8.ru
> =D0=9E=D0=9E=D0=9E =C2=AB=D0=A28=C2=BB, 107076, =D0=B3. =D0=9C=D0=BE=D1=
=81=D0=BA=D0=B2=D0=B0
> =D0=9A=D1=80=D0=B0=D1=81=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=B3=D0=B0=D1=82=D1=8B=
=D1=80=D1=81=D0=BA=D0=B0=D1=8F =D1=83=D0=BB., =D0=B4. 44, =D1=81=D1=82=D1=
=80.1
> www.t8.ru <https://t8.ru/>



--=20
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
/usr/games/fortune -es says:
(Never thought I'd be telling Malcolm and Ilya the same thing... :-)
		-- Larry Wall in <199711071819.KAA29909@wall.org>

--Sig_/=NFLv9desMWs7E8p+K+nggT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEX3FAW1ccuO4qQUpPx3wR4EmgbmYFAmJZlpsACgkQx3wR4Emg
bmb5ewf/YC7oNtX/ZIZW7AN0ociDi1obbjCGl+Z96svLX3huIY4nmtZ764zCoKIN
V1UJ8oSrcXp7eAP4b6Drxdi/Un9CfL6fVhFOTi5XdT8MHAnoU516zPhh99neiFlX
u8a1nvjkIJ4v+mJgCk2T996geYPHl/Uh6D/wXMPH+AllzmnIcRjOHu7huXe3h+Xl
OwAIUKDzHdq6kk5fB9JIKx9nExsm1/bwjA6XYszrdmDhYNDoeW3iBPMMmxynYcHC
+1qB23dwQGzlmRtYnRF0e7iMtgyTlqTR9VjNTIP1yK/odfm7KdXhpslyyb+V9gYg
9QMEibXfNGOtGxCtLxUiIO5FKAzXBA==
=+uXM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/=NFLv9desMWs7E8p+K+nggT--



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-15 14:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-15 14:02 [PVE-User] PowerEdge R440 & watchdog timer Сергей Цаболов
     [not found] ` <mailman.275.1650032197.377.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
     [not found]   ` <mailman.276.1650032585.377.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
2022-04-15 14:48     ` Сергей Цаболов

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal