all lists on lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
To: "Proxmox VE development discussion" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
	"Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage] rbd: alloc image: fix #3970 avoid ambiguous rbd path
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 09:52:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d033562e-bb25-74fe-4095-7fe152d8563a@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1649229686.hkn6936l0d.astroid@nora.none>



On 4/6/22 09:36, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> On April 5, 2022 2:40 pm, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
[...]
>>   
>> +    # check if another rbd storage with the same pool name but different
>> +    # cluster exists. If so, allocating a new volume can potentially be
>> +    # dangerous because the RBD mapping, exposes it in an ambiguous way under
>> +    # /dev/rbd/<pool>/<ns>/<image>. Without any information to which cluster it
>> +    # belongs, we cannot clearly determine which image we access and
>> +    # potentially use the wrong one. See
>> +    # https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3969 and
>> +    # https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3970
>> +    # TODO: remove these checks once #3969 is fixed and we can clearly tell to
>> +    # which cluster an image belongs to
>> +    my $storecfg = PVE::Storage::config();
>> +    foreach my $store  (keys %{$storecfg->{ids}}) {
> 
> I think this needs to go somewhere else - probably into a new private
> helper that gets called in alloc_image, clone_image and rename_image (at
> least those are the ones that currently call find_free_diskname).
> 
> basically all existing volids are as they are (they should be fine, else
> the user would probably already have noticed data loss/corruption), but
> anything that takes a new slot should be blocked before causing mayhem.

good point

> 
>> +	next if $store eq $storeid;
>> +
>> +	my $checked_scfg = $storecfg->{ids}->{$store};
>> +
>> +	next if $checked_scfg->{type} ne 'rbd';
>> +	next if $checked_scfg->{disable};
>> +	next if $scfg->{pool} ne $checked_scfg->{pool};
>> +
>> +	my $normalize_mons = sub { return join('/', sort( PVE::Tools::split_list(' ', shift))) };
> 
> this doesn't do what you think it does ;) split_list takes a single
> argument (the string to be split). I think joining with ';' might be
> more natural (it's basically a 'split->sort->join-as-string-list' then),
> and semicolons don't make any sense inside a monhost anyway.

thanks for catching it :)

> 
>> +	my $cmp_mons = sub { $normalize_mons->($_[0]) cmp $normalize_mons->($_[1]) };
>> +	my $cmp = sub { $_[0] cmp $_[1] };
> 
> that might be a nice addition to safe_compare (no $cmp -> use `cmp`),
> but alas.
> 
>> +	# internal and internal, or external and external with identical monitors
>> +	# => same cluster
>> +	next if PVE::Tools::safe_compare($scfg->{monhost}, $checked_scfg->{monhost}, $cmp_mons) == 0;
>> +
>> +	# different namespaces => no clash possible
>> +	next if !PVE::Tools::safe_compare($scfg->{namespace}, $checked_scfg->{namespace}, $cmp) == 0;
> 
> != 0 please!

yep :-/

> 
>> +
>> +	die "Other storage found which would lead to ambiguous mappings: '$store'\n";
> 
> it might make sense to include both storages here? e.g.:
> "Cannot create volume on '$storeid' - RBD blockdev paths shared with
> storage '$store'\n";
> 
> or even a reference to the bug that explains it all? could post a
> comment with workarounds as well then (although I do hope that not many
> people will run into this, and most of those are hopefully false
> positives of the check and not actually problematic setups).

hmm, a full on link to the bug in the error message? I tried to search via a few search engines for something like "proxmox bug #3969" and the results were not leading to bugzilla.proxmox.com. I don't think just adding the bug number will be that useful for most people.





      reply	other threads:[~2022-04-06  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-05 12:40 Aaron Lauterer
2022-04-06  7:36 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2022-04-06  7:52   ` Aaron Lauterer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d033562e-bb25-74fe-4095-7fe152d8563a@proxmox.com \
    --to=a.lauterer@proxmox.com \
    --cc=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal