From: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] applied-series: [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 00/10] notifications: cleanup in preparation of overridable templates
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 15:27:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b747eae5-0a10-4219-b32e-9ac692443be6@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6dbcec7-1d88-428f-9001-a9625dd5e302@proxmox.com>
On 2025-04-02 14:45, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 28.03.25 um 11:22 schrieb Lukas Wagner:> When the notification system was brought to PBS, the template strings
>> were moved to the template files as they were, without any changes.
>> The original templates were an implementation detail which were not
>> exposed to the user in any way.
>> They were bit inconsistent with regards to how template variables were
>> named (e.g. '{{datastore}}', '{{store}}', '{{job.store}}' for
>> referring to a datastore), as well es how variables/helpers
>> were accessed ({{ var }} vs {{var}}).
>>
>> With [#6143] on the horizon, notification templates, template variables
>> and template helpers become part of our public API and as such
>> we should provide some stability guarantees for them.
>
> Series seems alright to me, I'm just wondering a bit how that guarantee
> will look like? But probably better part of the series that is actually
> implementing [#6143].
I would suggest:
- no backward-incompatible changes in minor upgrades
- for breaking changes in major upgrades, implement some best-effort
checks in pbsXtoY/pveXtoY which check any custom templates for
anything that will be changed/removed
Incompatible changes are:
- removing variables
- changing type/representation of variables (e.g. switching from number of bytes to KiB, etc.)
- removing helpers
- non-trivial changes to a helper's behavior
- incompatible changes to the rendering engine (e.g. switching from Handlebars to something else)
Backward-compatible changes would be:
- adding new template variables
- adding new template helpers
- adding new, optional parameters to existing helpers
- trivial changes to helpers (hypothetical example: "1KiB" -> "1 KiB" for `{{ human-bytes 1024 }}`)
What do you think?
--
- Lukas
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-02 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-28 10:22 [pbs-devel] " Lukas Wagner
2025-03-28 10:22 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 01/10] notifications: move make notifications module a dir-style module Lukas Wagner
2025-03-28 10:22 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 02/10] notifications: add type for GC notification template data Lukas Wagner
2025-03-28 10:22 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 03/10] notifications: add type for ACME " Lukas Wagner
2025-03-28 10:22 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 04/10] notifications: add type for APT " Lukas Wagner
2025-03-28 10:22 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 05/10] notifications: add type for prune " Lukas Wagner
2025-03-28 10:22 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 06/10] notifications: add type for sync " Lukas Wagner
2025-03-28 10:22 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 07/10] notifications: add type for tape backup " Lukas Wagner
2025-03-28 10:22 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 08/10] notifications: add type for tape load " Lukas Wagner
2025-03-28 10:22 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 09/10] notifications: add type for verify " Lukas Wagner
2025-03-28 10:22 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 10/10] notifications: remove HTML template for test notification Lukas Wagner
2025-04-02 12:45 ` [pbs-devel] applied-series: [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 00/10] notifications: cleanup in preparation of overridable templates Thomas Lamprecht
2025-04-02 13:27 ` Lukas Wagner [this message]
2025-04-02 14:33 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-04-03 10:50 ` Lukas Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b747eae5-0a10-4219-b32e-9ac692443be6@proxmox.com \
--to=l.wagner@proxmox.com \
--cc=a.zeidler@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal