From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 4/7] btrfs: forcefully set image to readwrite
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:44:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4154a19-4432-4ec8-b890-101175376b6c@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250219111740.200819-4-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
I want to apply the series with a small follow-up, i.e.
> btrfs: avoid superfluous check in foreach_snapshot_of_subvol() helper
>
> The helper iterates with the BTRFS_SNAPSHOT_REGEX regular expression,
> so there will always be a snapshot name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm
> index a28996c..e47f25e 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm
> @@ -417,7 +417,6 @@ my sub foreach_snapshot_of_subvol : prototype($$) {
> my ($volume, $name, $snap_name) = ($1, $2, $3);
> return if !path_is_subvolume("$dir/$volume");
> return if $name ne $basename;
> - return if !defined $snap_name;
> $code->($snap_name);
> });
> }
but I need to ask about this patch first.
Am 19.02.25 um 12:17 schrieb Maximiliano Sandoval:
> When a subvolume is transferred via btrfs send/receive the resulting
> image contains the received_uuid property set. This property is required
> to do incremental snapshots.
>
> A downside though is that once the received_uuid property is set, it is
> not possible to make the image readwrite again without the force (-f)
> flag, and in such case the received_uuid property is lost. Since we know
> the images are only set to rw for the duration of the move, it is safe
> to set the flag forcefully and then in a future commit add the
> received_uuid property by force.
What do you mean exactly with "add the received_uuid property by force"?
What would the command for that be? Just want to make sure we don't
block our way to support incremental export/import later (it's broken
right now [0], but we might want to implement it at some point).
[0]:
https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20250221154111.73194-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com/T/
>
> Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
> ---
> src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm
> index 7dec6e8..9fc51ef 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/Storage/BTRFSPlugin.pm
> @@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ sub volume_import {
> # Rotate the disk into place, first the current state:
> # Note that read-only subvolumes cannot be moved into different directories, but for the
> # "current" state we also want a writable copy, so start with that:
> - $class->btrfs_cmd(['property', 'set', "$tmppath/$diskname\@$snapshot", 'ro', 'false']);
> + $class->btrfs_cmd(['property', 'set', '-f', "$tmppath/$diskname\@$snapshot", 'ro', 'false']);
> PVE::Tools::renameat2(
> -1,
> "$tmppath/$diskname\@$snapshot",
> @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ sub volume_import {
>
> # Now go through the remaining snapshots (if any)
> foreach my $snap (@snapshots) {
> - $class->btrfs_cmd(['property', 'set', "$tmppath/$diskname\@$snap", 'ro', 'false']);
> + $class->btrfs_cmd(['property', 'set', '-f', "$tmppath/$diskname\@$snap", 'ro', 'false']);
> PVE::Tools::renameat2(
> -1,
> "$tmppath/$diskname\@$snap",
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-21 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-19 11:17 [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 1/7] btrfs: add helper to iterate over snapshots of a subvolume Maximiliano Sandoval
2025-02-19 11:17 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 2/7] fix #3873: btrfs: use foreach_snapshot_of_subvol helper in volume_export Maximiliano Sandoval
2025-02-19 11:17 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 3/7] btrfs: use foreach_snapshot_of_subvol helper in free_image Maximiliano Sandoval
2025-02-19 11:17 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 4/7] btrfs: forcefully set image to readwrite Maximiliano Sandoval
2025-02-21 15:44 ` Fiona Ebner [this message]
2025-02-24 8:43 ` Maximiliano Sandoval
2025-02-19 11:17 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 5/7] btrfs: rename volume regex Maximiliano Sandoval
2025-02-19 11:17 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 6/7] btrfs: remove foreach_subvol Maximiliano Sandoval
2025-02-19 11:17 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 7/7] btrfs: rename snapshot parameter Maximiliano Sandoval
2025-02-24 9:21 ` [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH storage v4 1/7] btrfs: add helper to iterate over snapshots of a subvolume Fiona Ebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a4154a19-4432-4ec8-b890-101175376b6c@proxmox.com \
--to=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=m.sandoval@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal