From: "Gabriel Goller" <g.goller@proxmox.com>
To: "Stoiko Ivanov" <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Cc: <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH] utils: cleanup username/userid regex and verify
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:54:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CZ4UPXW7I2I8.1EDVDG9R7VOQT@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240214125537.5af34979@rosa.proxmox.com>
Thanks for the review!
On Wed Feb 14, 2024 at 12:55 PM CET, Stoiko Ivanov wrote:
> > diff --git a/src/PMG/Utils.pm b/src/PMG/Utils.pm
> > index 12b3ed5..8f7d438 100644
> > --- a/src/PMG/Utils.pm
> > +++ b/src/PMG/Utils.pm
> > @@ -72,13 +72,12 @@ PVE::JSONSchema::register_standard_option('pmg-endtime', {
> > optional => 1,
> > });
> >
> > -PVE::JSONSchema::register_format('pmg-userid', \&verify_username);
> why deregister the format here? (verify_username does a bit more than a
> regex match - and reusing the same verification we use in the auth-code
> also in the parts where the API comes in helps in not getting even more
> matches-almost-the-same-regexes matching auth-data) - Currently I'd rather
> aim to reduce those and if possible unify PMG::UserConfig::verify_entry
> with verify_username here as far as possible - see also:
> https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pmg-devel/2023-March/002381.html
> and Fabian's follow-up to it.
Right, yeah. I readded the register_format call...
Hmm how would you unify verify_entry with verify_username though? It
seems to me that verify_entry just splits the username from the userid
(if needed) then checks if the username is in the userid (which we
could also check in verify_username) and then calls verify_username?
> > sub verify_username {
> > my ($username, $noerr) = @_;
> >
> > $username = '' if !$username;
> > my $len = length($username);
> > - if ($len < 3) {
> > + if ($len < 1) {
> this "username" here is actually the one with the realm...
> e.g. root@pam vs. root - so limiting the length to 1 is too little
> restrictive - probably at least renaming the variable name to user_id
> might help in reducing confusion..
Missed this :(
How about I use a min length of 5 here?
shortest realm (pam/pmg) + @ + shortest username = 5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-14 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-14 9:15 Gabriel Goller
2024-02-14 11:55 ` Stoiko Ivanov
2024-02-14 13:54 ` Gabriel Goller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CZ4UPXW7I2I8.1EDVDG9R7VOQT@proxmox.com \
--to=g.goller@proxmox.com \
--cc=pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=s.ivanov@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal