all lists on lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PVE-User] Any plans to migrate to systemd-networkd?
       [not found] <78619bca-8468-43e7-a67e-00f82f6c9cd7@gmail.com>
@ 2024-10-03 22:10 ` Kyle Schmitt
  2024-10-03 23:03   ` John Crisp
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kyle Schmitt @ 2024-10-03 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Proxmox VE user list

For an alternate point of view, unless does away with support for
everything other systemd-networkd, please don't change. Dealing with my
production systems, most of these systemd changes feel like change for
change's sake, not progress.  And I haven't had pleasant experiences with
systemd-networkd in production environments.

On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 7:20 PM Uwe Sauter <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Proxmox team, hi all,
>
>
> I stumbled across an article over at lwn.net:
>
> ===
> Debating ifupdown replacements for Debian trixie
>
> Debian does not have an official way to configure networking. Instead, it
has four [1] recommended ways to configure
> networking, one of which is the venerable ifupdown [2], which has been
part of Debian since the turn of the century and
> is showing its age. A conversation about its maintainability and possible
replacement with ifupdown‑ng [3] has led to
> discussions about the default network-management tools for Debian
"trixie" [4] (Debian 13, which is expected in 2025)
> and beyond. No route to consensus has been found, yet.
> ===
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration
> [2] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ifupdown
> [3] https://github.com/ifupdown-ng/ifupdown-ng
> [4] https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/
>
>
> Having made good experiences with systemd-networkd on Debian, Rocky Linux
and Arch Linux I was wondering whether Proxmox
> is working towards using systemd-networkd as the configuration tool in
one of the next major versions?
>
>
> Best,
>
>         Uwe
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PVE-User] Any plans to migrate to systemd-networkd?
  2024-10-03 22:10 ` [PVE-User] Any plans to migrate to systemd-networkd? Kyle Schmitt
@ 2024-10-03 23:03   ` John Crisp
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Crisp @ 2024-10-03 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Proxmox VE user list



On 4 October 2024 00:10:45 CEST, Kyle Schmitt <kyleaschmitt@gmail.com> wrote:
>For an alternate point of view, unless does away with support for
>everything other systemd-networkd, please don't change. Dealing with my
>production systems, most of these systemd changes feel like change for
>change's sake, not progress.  And I haven't had pleasant experiences with
>systemd-networkd in production environments.


+1


-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-03 23:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <78619bca-8468-43e7-a67e-00f82f6c9cd7@gmail.com>
2024-10-03 22:10 ` [PVE-User] Any plans to migrate to systemd-networkd? Kyle Schmitt
2024-10-03 23:03   ` John Crisp

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal