From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
To: Christoph Heiss <c.heiss@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs 1/1] partial fix #6226: macros: add LDAP_UDP macro
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 09:56:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b243910-e88e-4aa3-a592-0d732bcdcc78@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D8K44D12DN35.N2ED1JKP8ROD@proxmox.com>
On 3/19/25 09:50, Christoph Heiss wrote:
> On Tue Mar 18, 2025 at 4:38 PM CET, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
>> Add LDAP_UDP macro to the firewall to support LDAP implementations
>> that use UDP as well, such as Windows AD [1]
>>
>> [1] https://learn.microsoft.com/de-de/troubleshoot/windows-server/active-directory/config-firewall-for-ad-domains-and-trusts
>> [..]
>> --- a/proxmox-ve-config/resources/macros.json
>> +++ b/proxmox-ve-config/resources/macros.json
>> @@ -377,6 +377,15 @@
>> ],
>> "desc": "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol traffic"
>> },
>> + "LDAP_UDP": {
>
> What about naming it "AD" instead and including both the TCP and UDP
> rule instead? I.e. making it completely separate from the "normal" LDAP
> rule.
The idea was to not suddenly open up a port for users that are using
that macro currently (and it works fine for them).
> Naming it "LDAP_UDP" could be confusing to users, in that it might be
> required for actual, compliant LDAP servers as well, not just AD.
Agreed, that the name might not be optimal, I'm open to suggestions.
>> + "code": [
>> + {
>> + "dport": "389",
>> + "proto": "udp"
>> + }
>> + ],
>> + "desc": "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol traffic via UDP"
>> + },
>> "LDAPS": {
>> "code": [
>> {
>
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-19 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-18 15:38 Stefan Hanreich
2025-03-18 15:38 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-firewall " Stefan Hanreich
2025-03-19 8:50 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs " Christoph Heiss
2025-03-19 8:56 ` Stefan Hanreich [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b243910-e88e-4aa3-a592-0d732bcdcc78@proxmox.com \
--to=s.hanreich@proxmox.com \
--cc=c.heiss@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal