all lists on lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PVE-User] Again (not) renaming interfaces...
@ 2025-10-02 10:54 Marco Gaiarin
  2025-10-06 12:10 ` Alwin Antreich via pve-user
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marco Gaiarin @ 2025-10-02 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pve-user


Some servers, all upgraded from PVE6 to PVE7 and then PVE8.

Still i have some server Dell PowerEdge T440 that, sometime, not ever, fail
to rename interfaces, some log:

 Oct  2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[891]: lo: Invalid network interface name, ignoring: 
 Oct  2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[869]: eth1: Could not set AlternativeName= or apply AlternativeNamesPolicy=, ignoring: File exists
 Oct  2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[869]: ens1f1: Failed to rename network interface 3 from 'eth1' to 'ens1f1': File exists
 Oct  2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[869]: ens1f1: Failed to process device, ignoring: File exists
 Oct  2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[899]: eno1: Could not set AlternativeName= or apply AlternativeNamesPolicy=, ignoring: File exists

clearly, ifup2 does not found ens1f1 and don't bind the interface to the
bond.

I need to check manually the bond:

 root@pppve2:~# ip link | grep bond0
 2: ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master bond0 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
 5: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master bond0 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
 10: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master vmbr0 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
 root@pppve2:~# ip link | grep bond1
 6: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master bond1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
 12: bond1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master vmbr1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
 root@pppve2:~# ip link | grep bond2
 4: ens5f0np0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 9000 qdisc mq master bond2 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
 7: ens5f1np1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 9000 qdisc mq master bond2 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
 9: bond2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 9000 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000

find missing interface:

 root@pppve2:~# ip link | grep eth[0-9]
 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master bond1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000

and manually bind them:

 root@pppve2:~# ip link set eth1 master bond1
 root@pppve2:~# ip link | grep bond1
 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master bond1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
 6: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master bond1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
 12: bond1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master vmbr1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000

Why? It is better to fire up a bug?


Thanks.

-- 



_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PVE-User] Again (not) renaming interfaces...
  2025-10-02 10:54 [PVE-User] Again (not) renaming interfaces Marco Gaiarin
@ 2025-10-06 12:10 ` Alwin Antreich via pve-user
  2025-10-08 19:48   ` Marco Gaiarin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alwin Antreich via pve-user @ 2025-10-06 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Proxmox VE user list; +Cc: Alwin Antreich

[-- Attachment #1: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 7145 bytes --]

From: "Alwin Antreich" <alwin@antreich.com>
To: "Proxmox VE user list" <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Again (not) renaming interfaces...
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 12:10:18 +0000
Message-ID: <16f2c158a1e3a63e9986a14080a23c74b3c189a4@antreich.com>

Hi Marco,


October 2, 2025 at 12:54 PM, "Marco Gaiarin" <gaio@lilliput.linux.it mailto:gaio@lilliput.linux.it?to=%22Marco%20Gaiarin%22%20%3Cgaio%40lilliput.linux.it%3E > wrote:


> 
> Some servers, all upgraded from PVE6 to PVE7 and then PVE8.
> 
> Still i have some server Dell PowerEdge T440 that, sometime, not ever, fail
> to rename interfaces, some log:
> 
>  Oct 2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[891]: lo: Invalid network interface name, ignoring: 
>  Oct 2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[869]: eth1: Could not set AlternativeName= or apply AlternativeNamesPolicy=, ignoring: File exists
>  Oct 2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[869]: ens1f1: Failed to rename network interface 3 from 'eth1' to 'ens1f1': File exists
>  Oct 2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[869]: ens1f1: Failed to process device, ignoring: File exists
>  Oct 2 11:44:03 pppve2 (udev-worker)[899]: eno1: Could not set AlternativeName= or apply AlternativeNamesPolicy=, ignoring: File exists
> 
> clearly, ifup2 does not found ens1f1 and don't bind the interface to the
> bond.
> 
> I need to check manually the bond:
> 
>  root@pppve2:~# mailto:root@pppve2:~#  ip link | grep bond0
>  2: ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master bond0 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>  5: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master bond0 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>  10: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master vmbr0 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>  root@pppve2:~# mailto:root@pppve2:~#  ip link | grep bond1
>  6: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master bond1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>  12: bond1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master vmbr1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>  root@pppve2:~# mailto:root@pppve2:~#  ip link | grep bond2
>  4: ens5f0np0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 9000 qdisc mq master bond2 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>  7: ens5f1np1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 9000 qdisc mq master bond2 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>  9: bond2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 9000 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
> 
> find missing interface:
> 
>  root@pppve2:~# mailto:root@pppve2:~#  ip link | grep eth[0-9]
>  3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master bond1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
> 
> and manually bind them:
> 
>  root@pppve2:~# mailto:root@pppve2:~#  ip link set eth1 master bond1
>  root@pppve2:~# mailto:root@pppve2:~#  ip link | grep bond1
>  3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master bond1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>  6: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,SLAVE,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master bond1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>  12: bond1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master vmbr1 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
> 
> Why? It is better to fire up a bug?
> 
No, that is the usual thing to do when upgrading. ;) Till PVE9 at least, the pinning tool should help you there.
https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#network_pin_naming_scheme_version

Cheers,
Alwin



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PVE-User] Again (not) renaming interfaces...
  2025-10-06 12:10 ` Alwin Antreich via pve-user
@ 2025-10-08 19:48   ` Marco Gaiarin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marco Gaiarin @ 2025-10-08 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alwin Antreich via pve-user; +Cc: pve-user

Mandi! Alwin Antreich via pve-user
  In chel di` si favelave...

> No, that is the usual thing to do when upgrading. ;) Till PVE9 at least, the pinning tool should help you there.
> https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#network_pin_naming_scheme_version

...i don't think is a naming sheme problem; if i reboot the server, probably
interfaces get enumerated normally; so, this seems a transient problem.


Simply happen, and if someone say me, i coud try to debug it...

-- 



_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-08 20:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-02 10:54 [PVE-User] Again (not) renaming interfaces Marco Gaiarin
2025-10-06 12:10 ` Alwin Antreich via pve-user
2025-10-08 19:48   ` Marco Gaiarin

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal