From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Philipp Hufnagl <p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 3/4] pbs: Extraxt check_datastore_exists from activate_storage
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:34:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8edda3e3-5122-4885-96d5-ee1ad633d022@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231127114001.189590-4-p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
Am 27.11.23 um 12:40 schrieb Philipp Hufnagl:
> Parts contained in activate_storage are needed to be run to fix #5008,
> however, implementing a namespace check there would cause unneeded
> overhead.
>
Actually, maybe we can do without the overhead, which would also avoid
the need for making the connection in scan_datastores() optional. In
activate_storage(), we could do
if there is a namespace in scfg
assert_namespace_exists
else
assert_datastore_exists
because for a nonexistent datastore, the API call querying the
namespaces will still fail with a nice "no such datastore 'nonexistent'"
error, so we'd still catch that without making two API calls.
Not sure if we should even add additional checks in the on_{add,update}
then.
What do you (or other devs) think?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-27 11:39 [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 0/4] pbs: fix #5008: Check if datastore and namespace is valid on add- and update hooks Philipp Hufnagl
2023-11-27 11:39 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 1/4] pbs: Move pbs_api_connect earlyer in the code Philipp Hufnagl
2024-02-16 15:56 ` Fiona Ebner
2023-11-27 11:39 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 2/4] pbs: Make it possible to reuse PBS connection for datastore API call Philipp Hufnagl
2024-02-16 15:56 ` Fiona Ebner
2023-11-27 11:40 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 3/4] pbs: Extraxt check_datastore_exists from activate_storage Philipp Hufnagl
2024-02-16 15:56 ` Fiona Ebner
2024-02-19 8:34 ` Fiona Ebner [this message]
2023-11-27 11:40 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v4 4/4] pbs: fix #5008: Check if datastore and namespace is valid on add- and update hooks Philipp Hufnagl
2024-02-16 15:56 ` Fiona Ebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8edda3e3-5122-4885-96d5-ee1ad633d022@proxmox.com \
--to=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=p.hufnagl@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.