From: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs v3 1/2] pvesr: update the chapter and bring it into good condition
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 11:03:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80a47593-91e0-41cc-ad0f-6e9e5e5c5e5f@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250110165807.3-1-a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
On 1/10/25 17:58, Alexander Zeidler wrote:
> Existing information is preserved in a restructured way and usefully
> supplemented.
>
> * restructure and revise the introduction
> * add subchapter "Considerations"
> * remove the subchapter "Schedule Format" with its one line of content
> and link where appropriate directly to the copy under "25. Appendix D:
> Calendar Events". The help button at adding/editing a job links now to
> the subchapter "Managing Jobs".
> * provide details on job removal and how to enforce it if necessary
> * add more helpful CLI examples and improve/fix existing ones
> * restructure and revise the subchapter "Error Handling"
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
> ---
> v3:
> * adapt the introduction and section "Risk of Data Loss" to provide
> information about using a shared storage together with storage
> replication
> * update the CLI example `pvesr update` (*:00 replaces incorrect */00)
> * implement most suggestions from Daniel Kral
> ** update commit message
> ** reword first paragraph of introduction
> ** rename subchapter "Recommendations" to "Considerations"
> ** write "every 15 minutes" to be consistent with UI (and additionally
> mention that examples from the drop-down list can be modified)
> ** reword the description of the bandwidth limit
>
> v2: https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20241218161948.3-1-a.zeidler@proxmox.com/
> * no changes, only add missing pve-manager patch
>
> pvecm.adoc | 2 +
> pvesr.adoc | 411 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 2 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-)
I've read another time through the article and it reads great again -
nothing to complain from my side ;). The description for why the anchors
were created could've still landed in the commit message, but that's
just a tiny nit for me.
Otherwise thanks for the great article, consider this:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-16 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-10 16:58 Alexander Zeidler
2025-01-10 16:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v3 2/2] replication: update help button reference Alexander Zeidler
2025-01-16 10:03 ` Daniel Kral [this message]
2025-02-13 14:56 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH docs v3 1/2] pvesr: update the chapter and bring it into good condition Fiona Ebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80a47593-91e0-41cc-ad0f-6e9e5e5c5e5f@proxmox.com \
--to=d.kral@proxmox.com \
--cc=a.zeidler@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.