* [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api/pmg-gui v2 0/2] fix #3450: batch deletion/delivery for postfix queue @ 2025-09-23 9:33 Hannes Laimer 2025-09-23 9:33 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api v2 1/1] fix #3450: api: queue: add POST endpoint for batch deletion/delivery Hannes Laimer ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Hannes Laimer @ 2025-09-23 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pmg-devel Adds a new POST endpoint that accepts both a type(delete/deliver) and a list of id's. This is also how batch operations are done for quarantine. https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3450 v2: - instead of 'filter' use the IDs directly - UI now doesn't have extra buttons, the existing Remove and Flush ones will just work with either one or multiple selected items pmg-api: Hannes Laimer (1): fix #3450: api: queue: add POST endpoint for batch deletion/delivery src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/PMG/Postfix.pm | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+) pmg-gui: Hannes Laimer (1): fix #3450: ui: queue: multi-select for item deletion/delivery js/PostfixMailQueue.js | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) Summary over all repositories: 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) -- Generated by git-murpp 0.8.1 _______________________________________________ pmg-devel mailing list pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api v2 1/1] fix #3450: api: queue: add POST endpoint for batch deletion/delivery 2025-09-23 9:33 [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api/pmg-gui v2 0/2] fix #3450: batch deletion/delivery for postfix queue Hannes Laimer @ 2025-09-23 9:33 ` Hannes Laimer 2025-09-23 13:22 ` Thomas Lamprecht 2025-09-23 9:33 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-gui v2 1/1] fix #3450: ui: queue: multi-select for item deletion/delivery Hannes Laimer 2025-09-24 7:14 ` [pmg-devel] superseded: [PATCH pmg-api/pmg-gui v2 0/2] fix #3450: batch deletion/delivery for postfix queue Hannes Laimer 2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Hannes Laimer @ 2025-09-23 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pmg-devel Delivery is done using `postqueue -i <id>`, this is slower than using `postsuper -r -`. But `postsuper -r -` would only re-queue the mails, they'd also recieve new IDs. Flush should rather be an immediate delivery attempt. Signed-off-by: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com> --- for 2000 mails flush took ~8s, since 2000 is the max we can do at once through the UI I think this is ok. Alternatively we could also disable the Flush button if more than 200 or so a selected, but I don't think there is much value in that. v2: - single POST endpoitn that takes type(delete/deliver) and list of id's src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/PMG/Postfix.pm | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm b/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm index ba0689c..90a74e9 100644 --- a/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm +++ b/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm @@ -335,6 +335,49 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({ }, }); +__PACKAGE__->register_method({ + name => 'queue_action', + path => 'queue/{queue}', + method => 'POST', + description => "Perform an action on the given queue IDs (delete/deliver).", + proxyto => 'node', + permissions => { check => ['admin'] }, + protected => 1, + parameters => { + additionalProperties => 0, + properties => { + node => get_standard_option('pve-node'), + queue => $queue_name_option, + action => { + description => 'Operation to perform on the given IDs.', + type => 'string', + enum => ['delete', 'deliver'], + }, + id => { + description => 'Queue ID(s), separated by semicolons (;).', + type => 'string', + pattern => '[A-Za-z0-9]{8,20}(;[A-Za-z0-9]{8,20})*', + }, + }, + }, + returns => { type => 'null' }, + code => sub { + my ($param) = @_; + + my @ids = defined($param->{id}) && length($param->{id}) + ? split(/\s*;\s*/, $param->{id}) + : (); + + if ($param->{action} eq 'delete') { + PMG::Postfix::delete_queue_ids($param->{queue}, \@ids); + } elsif ($param->{action} eq 'deliver') { + PMG::Postfix::flush_queue_ids(\@ids); + } + + return undef; + }, +}); + __PACKAGE__->register_method({ name => 'delete_queue', path => 'queue/{queue}', diff --git a/src/PMG/Postfix.pm b/src/PMG/Postfix.pm index 966130f..dff8ec6 100644 --- a/src/PMG/Postfix.pm +++ b/src/PMG/Postfix.pm @@ -221,6 +221,39 @@ sub delete_queue { PVE::Tools::run_command($cmd); } +# delete multiple mails by queue IDs +sub delete_queue_ids { + my ($queue, $ids) = @_; + + return if !$ids || ref($ids) ne 'ARRAY' || !@$ids; + + my %seen; + my @queue_ids; + foreach my $qid (@$ids) { + next if !$qid; + next if $seen{$qid}++; + push @queue_ids, $qid; + } + + return if !@queue_ids; + + my $input = join("\n", @queue_ids) . "\n"; + my $cmd = ['/usr/sbin/postsuper', '-d', '-']; + push @$cmd, $queue if defined($queue); + PVE::Tools::run_command($cmd, input => $input); +} + +# flush for multiple queue IDs +sub flush_queue_ids { + my ($ids) = @_; + + return if !$ids || ref($ids) ne 'ARRAY' || !@$ids; + + foreach my $qid (@$ids) { + PVE::Tools::run_command(['/usr/sbin/postqueue', '-i', $qid]); + } +} + sub discard_verify_cache { unlink "/var/lib/postfix/verify_cache.db"; -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ pmg-devel mailing list pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api v2 1/1] fix #3450: api: queue: add POST endpoint for batch deletion/delivery 2025-09-23 9:33 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api v2 1/1] fix #3450: api: queue: add POST endpoint for batch deletion/delivery Hannes Laimer @ 2025-09-23 13:22 ` Thomas Lamprecht 2025-09-24 5:43 ` Hannes Laimer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Thomas Lamprecht @ 2025-09-23 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hannes Laimer, pmg-devel Am 23.09.25 um 11:33 schrieb Hannes Laimer: > Delivery is done using `postqueue -i <id>`, this is slower than using > `postsuper -r -`. But `postsuper -r -` would only re-queue the mails, > they'd also recieve new IDs. Flush should rather be an immediate delivery > attempt. > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com> > --- > for 2000 mails flush took ~8s, since 2000 is the max we can do at once > through the UI I think this is ok. Alternatively we could also disable > the Flush button if more than 200 or so a selected, but I don't think > there is much value in that. Such info is fine to have recorded in the commit message > > v2: > - single POST endpoitn that takes type(delete/deliver) and list of id's Fine for delivery, but why not add a new optional ids parameter to the existing DELETE endpoint? I mean, I have no strong objection against this, but I'd at least like to have a reason recorded in the commit message for why that route was not chosen. > > src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/PMG/Postfix.pm | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm b/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm > index ba0689c..90a74e9 100644 > --- a/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm > +++ b/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm > @@ -335,6 +335,49 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({ > }, > }); > > +__PACKAGE__->register_method({ > + name => 'queue_action', > + path => 'queue/{queue}', > + method => 'POST', > + description => "Perform an action on the given queue IDs (delete/deliver).", > + proxyto => 'node', > + permissions => { check => ['admin'] }, > + protected => 1, > + parameters => { > + additionalProperties => 0, > + properties => { > + node => get_standard_option('pve-node'), > + queue => $queue_name_option, > + action => { > + description => 'Operation to perform on the given IDs.', > + type => 'string', > + enum => ['delete', 'deliver'], > + }, > + id => { "ids" would slightly better signal that this can be more than one. > + description => 'Queue ID(s), separated by semicolons (;).', > + type => 'string', > + pattern => '[A-Za-z0-9]{8,20}(;[A-Za-z0-9]{8,20})*', hmm, don't we have a format for this or at least an existing regex we can reuse? > + }, > + }, > + }, > + returns => { type => 'null' }, > + code => sub { > + my ($param) = @_; > + > + my @ids = defined($param->{id}) && length($param->{id}) > + ? split(/\s*;\s*/, $param->{id}) > + : (); I'd prefer using PVE::Tools' split_list method, which handles most edge cases already. > + > + if ($param->{action} eq 'delete') { > + PMG::Postfix::delete_queue_ids($param->{queue}, \@ids); > + } elsif ($param->{action} eq 'deliver') { > + PMG::Postfix::flush_queue_ids(\@ids); > + } > + > + return undef; > + }, > +}); > + > __PACKAGE__->register_method({ > name => 'delete_queue', > path => 'queue/{queue}', > diff --git a/src/PMG/Postfix.pm b/src/PMG/Postfix.pm > index 966130f..dff8ec6 100644 > --- a/src/PMG/Postfix.pm > +++ b/src/PMG/Postfix.pm > @@ -221,6 +221,39 @@ sub delete_queue { > PVE::Tools::run_command($cmd); > } > > +# delete multiple mails by queue IDs > +sub delete_queue_ids { > + my ($queue, $ids) = @_; > + > + return if !$ids || ref($ids) ne 'ARRAY' || !@$ids; > + > + my %seen; > + my @queue_ids; > + foreach my $qid (@$ids) { please prefer for over foreach for new code. > + next if !$qid; > + next if $seen{$qid}++; > + push @queue_ids, $qid; > + } > + > + return if !@queue_ids; > + > + my $input = join("\n", @queue_ids) . "\n"; I mean, if you already iterate above, why not assemble the input string directly there? While sometimes it can be nicer for code readability to use a intermediate array This is short enough to still be easy enough to read and grasp. And btw. as of now you have the $id 4 times in memory: 1. in $ids 2. in %seen (well deduplicated, but still) 3. in @queue_ids 4. in $input If you want to cope with duplicates then it would be probably even better to just do my $unique_qids = { map { $_ => 1 } $ids->@* }; my $input = join("\n", keys $unique_qids->%*) . "\n"; That avoids at least one copy. > + my $cmd = ['/usr/sbin/postsuper', '-d', '-']; > + push @$cmd, $queue if defined($queue); > + PVE::Tools::run_command($cmd, input => $input); > +} > + > +# flush for multiple queue IDs > +sub flush_queue_ids { > + my ($ids) = @_; > + > + return if !$ids || ref($ids) ne 'ARRAY' || !@$ids; > + > + foreach my $qid (@$ids) { s/foreach/for/ > + PVE::Tools::run_command(['/usr/sbin/postqueue', '-i', $qid]); > + } > +} > + > sub discard_verify_cache { > unlink "/var/lib/postfix/verify_cache.db"; > _______________________________________________ pmg-devel mailing list pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api v2 1/1] fix #3450: api: queue: add POST endpoint for batch deletion/delivery 2025-09-23 13:22 ` Thomas Lamprecht @ 2025-09-24 5:43 ` Hannes Laimer 2025-09-24 8:19 ` Thomas Lamprecht 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Hannes Laimer @ 2025-09-24 5:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Lamprecht, pmg-devel Thanks for taking a look! two comments inline, and I'll send a v3 On 23.09.25 15:22, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 23.09.25 um 11:33 schrieb Hannes Laimer: >> Delivery is done using `postqueue -i <id>`, this is slower than using >> `postsuper -r -`. But `postsuper -r -` would only re-queue the mails, >> they'd also recieve new IDs. Flush should rather be an immediate delivery >> attempt. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com> >> --- >> for 2000 mails flush took ~8s, since 2000 is the max we can do at once >> through the UI I think this is ok. Alternatively we could also disable >> the Flush button if more than 200 or so a selected, but I don't think >> there is much value in that. > > Such info is fine to have recorded in the commit message > >> >> v2: >> - single POST endpoitn that takes type(delete/deliver) and list of id's > > Fine for delivery, but why not add a new optional ids parameter to the > existing DELETE endpoint? > To have it mentioned here, the reason is that DELETE doesn't take data, at least our proxy doesn't, and something like `.../{queue}/?ids=AABC234,DDEF4543,EEFG6473,...` is at best odd and brittle. I should have included this and I'll add it for v3. > I mean, I have no strong objection against this, but I'd at least like > to have a reason recorded in the commit message for why that route was > not chosen. > >> >> src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> src/PMG/Postfix.pm | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm b/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm >> index ba0689c..90a74e9 100644 >> --- a/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm >> +++ b/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm >> @@ -335,6 +335,49 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({ >> }, >> }); >> >> +__PACKAGE__->register_method({ >> + name => 'queue_action', >> + path => 'queue/{queue}', >> + method => 'POST', >> + description => "Perform an action on the given queue IDs (delete/deliver).", >> + proxyto => 'node', >> + permissions => { check => ['admin'] }, >> + protected => 1, >> + parameters => { >> + additionalProperties => 0, >> + properties => { >> + node => get_standard_option('pve-node'), >> + queue => $queue_name_option, >> + action => { >> + description => 'Operation to perform on the given IDs.', >> + type => 'string', >> + enum => ['delete', 'deliver'], >> + }, >> + id => { > > "ids" would slightly better signal that this can be more than one. > >> + description => 'Queue ID(s), separated by semicolons (;).', >> + type => 'string', >> + pattern => '[A-Za-z0-9]{8,20}(;[A-Za-z0-9]{8,20})*', > > hmm, don't we have a format for this or at least an existing regex > we can reuse? > not really, there's only ``` my $queue_id_option = { description => "The Message queue ID.", type => 'string', pattern => '[a-zA-Z0-9]+', minLength => 8, maxLength => 20, }; ``` but I don't think a thing for just `[a-zA-Z0-9]+` adds much. >> + }, >> + }, >> + }, >> + returns => { type => 'null' }, >> + code => sub { >> + my ($param) = @_; >> + >> + my @ids = defined($param->{id}) && length($param->{id}) >> + ? split(/\s*;\s*/, $param->{id}) >> + : (); > > I'd prefer using PVE::Tools' split_list method, which handles most edge > cases already. > >> + >> + if ($param->{action} eq 'delete') { >> + PMG::Postfix::delete_queue_ids($param->{queue}, \@ids); >> + } elsif ($param->{action} eq 'deliver') { >> + PMG::Postfix::flush_queue_ids(\@ids); >> + } >> + >> + return undef; >> + }, >> +}); >> + >> __PACKAGE__->register_method({ >> name => 'delete_queue', >> path => 'queue/{queue}', >> diff --git a/src/PMG/Postfix.pm b/src/PMG/Postfix.pm >> index 966130f..dff8ec6 100644 >> --- a/src/PMG/Postfix.pm >> +++ b/src/PMG/Postfix.pm >> @@ -221,6 +221,39 @@ sub delete_queue { >> PVE::Tools::run_command($cmd); >> } >> >> +# delete multiple mails by queue IDs >> +sub delete_queue_ids { >> + my ($queue, $ids) = @_; >> + >> + return if !$ids || ref($ids) ne 'ARRAY' || !@$ids; >> + >> + my %seen; >> + my @queue_ids; >> + foreach my $qid (@$ids) { > > please prefer for over foreach for new code. > >> + next if !$qid; >> + next if $seen{$qid}++; >> + push @queue_ids, $qid; >> + } >> + >> + return if !@queue_ids; >> + >> + my $input = join("\n", @queue_ids) . "\n"; > > I mean, if you already iterate above, why not assemble the input string > directly there? While sometimes it can be nicer for code readability to > use a intermediate array This is short enough to still be easy enough to > read and grasp. > > And btw. as of now you have the $id 4 times in memory: > > 1. in $ids > 2. in %seen (well deduplicated, but still) > 3. in @queue_ids > 4. in $input > > If you want to cope with duplicates then it would be probably even better > to just do > > my $unique_qids = { map { $_ => 1 } $ids->@* }; > > my $input = join("\n", keys $unique_qids->%*) . "\n"; > > That avoids at least one copy. > >> + my $cmd = ['/usr/sbin/postsuper', '-d', '-']; >> + push @$cmd, $queue if defined($queue); >> + PVE::Tools::run_command($cmd, input => $input); >> +} >> + >> +# flush for multiple queue IDs >> +sub flush_queue_ids { >> + my ($ids) = @_; >> + >> + return if !$ids || ref($ids) ne 'ARRAY' || !@$ids; >> + >> + foreach my $qid (@$ids) { > > s/foreach/for/ > >> + PVE::Tools::run_command(['/usr/sbin/postqueue', '-i', $qid]); >> + } >> +} >> + >> sub discard_verify_cache { >> unlink "/var/lib/postfix/verify_cache.db"; >> > _______________________________________________ pmg-devel mailing list pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api v2 1/1] fix #3450: api: queue: add POST endpoint for batch deletion/delivery 2025-09-24 5:43 ` Hannes Laimer @ 2025-09-24 8:19 ` Thomas Lamprecht 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Thomas Lamprecht @ 2025-09-24 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hannes Laimer, pmg-devel Am 24.09.25 um 07:43 schrieb Hannes Laimer: > On 23.09.25 15:22, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: >> Am 23.09.25 um 11:33 schrieb Hannes Laimer: >>> - single POST endpoitn that takes type(delete/deliver) and list of id's >> >> Fine for delivery, but why not add a new optional ids parameter to the >> existing DELETE endpoint? >> > > To have it mentioned here, the reason is that > DELETE doesn't take data, at least our proxy doesn't, and something like > `.../{queue}/?ids=AABC234,DDEF4543,EEFG6473,...` > is at best odd and brittle. Meh, nothing should speak against DELETE taking a body from a technical POV, but fair enough. > I should have included this and I'll add it for v3. Yes, please do! >>> diff --git a/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm b/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm >>> index ba0689c..90a74e9 100644 >>> --- a/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm >>> +++ b/src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm >>> @@ -335,6 +335,49 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({ >>> }, >>> }); >>> +__PACKAGE__->register_method({ >>> + name => 'queue_action', >>> + path => 'queue/{queue}', >>> + method => 'POST', >>> + description => "Perform an action on the given queue IDs (delete/deliver).", >>> + proxyto => 'node', >>> + permissions => { check => ['admin'] }, >>> + protected => 1, >>> + parameters => { >>> + additionalProperties => 0, >>> + properties => { >>> + node => get_standard_option('pve-node'), >>> + queue => $queue_name_option, >>> + action => { >>> + description => 'Operation to perform on the given IDs.', >>> + type => 'string', >>> + enum => ['delete', 'deliver'], >>> + }, >>> + id => { >> >> "ids" would slightly better signal that this can be more than one. >> >>> + description => 'Queue ID(s), separated by semicolons (;).', >>> + type => 'string', >>> + pattern => '[A-Za-z0-9]{8,20}(;[A-Za-z0-9]{8,20})*', >> >> hmm, don't we have a format for this or at least an existing regex >> we can reuse? >> > > not really, there's only > ``` > my $queue_id_option = { > description => "The Message queue ID.", > type => 'string', > pattern => '[a-zA-Z0-9]+', > minLength => 8, > maxLength => 20, > }; > ``` > but I don't think a thing for just `[a-zA-Z0-9]+` adds much. it's obviously trivial and indeed does not add much on it's own from a low-level POV, but these can be abstractions that still help to argue and reason about the code nonetheless; that said, I'm fine with deciding some not so hard cuts on a case by case basis, and for me it can be fine to keep this as is then if there is nothing factored out already. _______________________________________________ pmg-devel mailing list pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-gui v2 1/1] fix #3450: ui: queue: multi-select for item deletion/delivery 2025-09-23 9:33 [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api/pmg-gui v2 0/2] fix #3450: batch deletion/delivery for postfix queue Hannes Laimer 2025-09-23 9:33 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api v2 1/1] fix #3450: api: queue: add POST endpoint for batch deletion/delivery Hannes Laimer @ 2025-09-23 9:33 ` Hannes Laimer 2025-09-23 13:27 ` Thomas Lamprecht 2025-09-24 7:14 ` [pmg-devel] superseded: [PATCH pmg-api/pmg-gui v2 0/2] fix #3450: batch deletion/delivery for postfix queue Hannes Laimer 2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Hannes Laimer @ 2025-09-23 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pmg-devel ExtJS does not allow having a "select all" checkbox in the header for buffered stores, that is why we have to use `Ext.data.Store` instead. Signed-off-by: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com> --- filtering did not feel as instant as it did with the buffered store, but not really noticable js/PostfixMailQueue.js | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/js/PostfixMailQueue.js b/js/PostfixMailQueue.js index 17c7d05..7fd690d 100644 --- a/js/PostfixMailQueue.js +++ b/js/PostfixMailQueue.js @@ -22,8 +22,14 @@ Ext.define('PMG.Postfix.MailQueue', { queuename: 'deferred', + selModel: { + selType: 'checkboxmodel', + mode: 'MULTI', + showHeaderCheckbox: true, + }, + store: { - xclass: 'Ext.data.BufferedStore', + xclass: 'Ext.data.Store', model: 'pmg-mailq', remoteFilter: true, remoteSort: true, @@ -54,44 +60,62 @@ Ext.define('PMG.Postfix.MailQueue', { onFlush: function (button, event, rec) { var view = this.getView(); - - Proxmox.Utils.API2Request({ - url: - '/api2/extjs/nodes/' + - view.nodename + - '/postfix/queue/' + - view.queuename + - '/' + - rec.data.queue_id, - method: 'POST', - waitMsgTarget: view, - failure: function (response, opts) { - Ext.Msg.alert(gettext('Error'), response.htmlStatus); - }, - }); + let sel = view.getSelectionModel().getSelection(); + if (sel && sel.length > 0) { + let ids = sel.map((r) => r.get('queue_id')); + Ext.Msg.show({ + title: gettext('Confirm'), + message: Ext.String.format(gettext("Deliver {0} selected mails now?"), ids.length), + buttons: Ext.Msg.YESNO, + icon: Ext.Msg.WARNING, + fn: function (btn) { + if (btn !== 'yes') { return; } + Proxmox.Utils.API2Request({ + url: + '/api2/extjs/nodes/' + + view.nodename + + '/postfix/queue/' + + view.queuename, + method: 'POST', + params: { action: 'deliver', id: ids.join(';') }, + waitMsgTarget: view, + success: function () { view.selModel.deselectAll(); view.store.load(); }, + failure: function (response) { Ext.Msg.alert(gettext('Error'), response.htmlStatus); }, + }); + }, + }); + return; + } }, onRemove: function (button, event, rec) { var view = this.getView(); - - Proxmox.Utils.API2Request({ - url: - '/api2/extjs/nodes/' + - view.nodename + - '/postfix/queue/' + - view.queuename + - '/' + - rec.data.queue_id, - method: 'DELETE', - waitMsgTarget: view, - success: function (response, opts) { - view.selModel.deselectAll(); - view.store.load(); - }, - failure: function (response, opts) { - Ext.Msg.alert(gettext('Error'), response.htmlStatus); - }, - }); + let sel = view.getSelectionModel().getSelection(); + if (sel && sel.length > 0) { + let ids = sel.map((r) => r.get('queue_id')); + Ext.Msg.show({ + title: gettext('Confirm'), + message: Ext.String.format(gettext("Delete {0} selected mails?"), ids.length), + buttons: Ext.Msg.YESNO, + icon: Ext.Msg.WARNING, + fn: function (btn) { + if (btn !== 'yes') { return; } + Proxmox.Utils.API2Request({ + url: + '/api2/extjs/nodes/' + + view.nodename + + '/postfix/queue/' + + view.queuename, + method: 'POST', + params: { action: 'delete', id: ids.join(';') }, + waitMsgTarget: view, + success: function () { view.selModel.deselectAll(); view.store.load(); }, + failure: function (response) { Ext.Msg.alert(gettext('Error'), response.htmlStatus); }, + }); + }, + }); + return; + } }, onHeaders: function (button, event, rec) { @@ -130,6 +154,12 @@ Ext.define('PMG.Postfix.MailQueue', { tbar: [ { xtype: 'proxmoxButton', + reference: 'headerBtn', + enableFn: function (rec) { + let grid = this.up('grid'); + if (!grid) { return false; } + return grid.getSelectionModel().getCount() === 1; + }, disabled: true, text: gettext('Headers'), handler: 'onHeaders', @@ -141,7 +171,9 @@ Ext.define('PMG.Postfix.MailQueue', { handler: 'onFlush', }, { - xtype: 'proxmoxStdRemoveButton', + xtype: 'proxmoxButton', + disabled: true, + text: gettext('Remove'), handler: 'onRemove', }, { -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ pmg-devel mailing list pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-gui v2 1/1] fix #3450: ui: queue: multi-select for item deletion/delivery 2025-09-23 9:33 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-gui v2 1/1] fix #3450: ui: queue: multi-select for item deletion/delivery Hannes Laimer @ 2025-09-23 13:27 ` Thomas Lamprecht 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Thomas Lamprecht @ 2025-09-23 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hannes Laimer, pmg-devel Am 23.09.25 um 11:34 schrieb Hannes Laimer: > ExtJS does not allow having a "select all" checkbox in the header for > buffered stores, that is why we have to use `Ext.data.Store` instead. > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com> > --- > filtering did not feel as instant as it did with the buffered store, but > not really noticable > > js/PostfixMailQueue.js | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/js/PostfixMailQueue.js b/js/PostfixMailQueue.js > index 17c7d05..7fd690d 100644 > --- a/js/PostfixMailQueue.js > +++ b/js/PostfixMailQueue.js > @@ -22,8 +22,14 @@ Ext.define('PMG.Postfix.MailQueue', { > > queuename: 'deferred', > > + selModel: { > + selType: 'checkboxmodel', > + mode: 'MULTI', > + showHeaderCheckbox: true, > + }, > + > store: { > - xclass: 'Ext.data.BufferedStore', > + xclass: 'Ext.data.Store', > model: 'pmg-mailq', > remoteFilter: true, > remoteSort: true, > @@ -54,44 +60,62 @@ Ext.define('PMG.Postfix.MailQueue', { > > onFlush: function (button, event, rec) { > var view = this.getView(); > - > - Proxmox.Utils.API2Request({ > - url: > - '/api2/extjs/nodes/' + > - view.nodename + > - '/postfix/queue/' + > - view.queuename + > - '/' + > - rec.data.queue_id, > - method: 'POST', > - waitMsgTarget: view, > - failure: function (response, opts) { > - Ext.Msg.alert(gettext('Error'), response.htmlStatus); > - }, > - }); > + let sel = view.getSelectionModel().getSelection(); > + if (sel && sel.length > 0) { > + let ids = sel.map((r) => r.get('queue_id')); > + Ext.Msg.show({ > + title: gettext('Confirm'), > + message: Ext.String.format(gettext("Deliver {0} selected mails now?"), ids.length), > + buttons: Ext.Msg.YESNO, > + icon: Ext.Msg.WARNING, Is this really something we want to use a warning for? Also, will it now prompt for a single mail too? Would like to avoid doing that for the single mail edge case. > + fn: function (btn) { > + if (btn !== 'yes') { return; } > + Proxmox.Utils.API2Request({ > + url: > + '/api2/extjs/nodes/' + > + view.nodename + > + '/postfix/queue/' + > + view.queuename, could use a template string `/api2/extjs/nodes/${view.nodename}/postfix/queue/${view.queuename}` > + method: 'POST', > + params: { action: 'deliver', id: ids.join(';') }, > + waitMsgTarget: view, > + success: function () { view.selModel.deselectAll(); view.store.load(); }, would rather have above function split over multiple lines. > + failure: function (response) { Ext.Msg.alert(gettext('Error'), response.htmlStatus); }, can be written as: failure: (response) => Ext.Msg.alert(gettext('Error'), response.htmlStatus), > + }); > + }, > + }); > + return; > + } > }, > > onRemove: function (button, event, rec) { > var view = this.getView(); > - > - Proxmox.Utils.API2Request({ > - url: > - '/api2/extjs/nodes/' + > - view.nodename + > - '/postfix/queue/' + > - view.queuename + > - '/' + > - rec.data.queue_id, > - method: 'DELETE', > - waitMsgTarget: view, > - success: function (response, opts) { > - view.selModel.deselectAll(); > - view.store.load(); > - }, > - failure: function (response, opts) { > - Ext.Msg.alert(gettext('Error'), response.htmlStatus); > - }, > - }); Most comments from above also apply to the code below. > + let sel = view.getSelectionModel().getSelection(); > + if (sel && sel.length > 0) { > + let ids = sel.map((r) => r.get('queue_id')); > + Ext.Msg.show({ > + title: gettext('Confirm'), > + message: Ext.String.format(gettext("Delete {0} selected mails?"), ids.length), > + buttons: Ext.Msg.YESNO, > + icon: Ext.Msg.WARNING, > + fn: function (btn) { > + if (btn !== 'yes') { return; } > + Proxmox.Utils.API2Request({ > + url: > + '/api2/extjs/nodes/' + > + view.nodename + > + '/postfix/queue/' + > + view.queuename, > + method: 'POST', > + params: { action: 'delete', id: ids.join(';') }, > + waitMsgTarget: view, > + success: function () { view.selModel.deselectAll(); view.store.load(); }, > + failure: function (response) { Ext.Msg.alert(gettext('Error'), response.htmlStatus); }, > + }); > + }, > + }); > + return; > + } > }, > > onHeaders: function (button, event, rec) { > @@ -130,6 +154,12 @@ Ext.define('PMG.Postfix.MailQueue', { > tbar: [ > { > xtype: 'proxmoxButton', > + reference: 'headerBtn', > + enableFn: function (rec) { > + let grid = this.up('grid'); > + if (!grid) { return false; } > + return grid.getSelectionModel().getCount() === 1; > + }, > disabled: true, > text: gettext('Headers'), > handler: 'onHeaders', > @@ -141,7 +171,9 @@ Ext.define('PMG.Postfix.MailQueue', { > handler: 'onFlush', > }, > { > - xtype: 'proxmoxStdRemoveButton', > + xtype: 'proxmoxButton', > + disabled: true, > + text: gettext('Remove'), > handler: 'onRemove', > }, > { _______________________________________________ pmg-devel mailing list pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [pmg-devel] superseded: [PATCH pmg-api/pmg-gui v2 0/2] fix #3450: batch deletion/delivery for postfix queue 2025-09-23 9:33 [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api/pmg-gui v2 0/2] fix #3450: batch deletion/delivery for postfix queue Hannes Laimer 2025-09-23 9:33 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api v2 1/1] fix #3450: api: queue: add POST endpoint for batch deletion/delivery Hannes Laimer 2025-09-23 9:33 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-gui v2 1/1] fix #3450: ui: queue: multi-select for item deletion/delivery Hannes Laimer @ 2025-09-24 7:14 ` Hannes Laimer 2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Hannes Laimer @ 2025-09-24 7:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pmg-devel superseded-by: https://lore.proxmox.com/pmg-devel/20250924071314.41917-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com/T/#t On 23.09.25 11:33, Hannes Laimer wrote: > Adds a new POST endpoint that accepts both a type(delete/deliver) and a > list of id's. This is also how batch operations are done for quarantine. > > https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3450 > > v2: > - instead of 'filter' use the IDs directly > - UI now doesn't have extra buttons, the existing Remove and Flush ones > will just work with either one or multiple selected items > > pmg-api: > > Hannes Laimer (1): > fix #3450: api: queue: add POST endpoint for batch deletion/delivery > > src/PMG/API2/Postfix.pm | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/PMG/Postfix.pm | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+) > > > pmg-gui: > > Hannes Laimer (1): > fix #3450: ui: queue: multi-select for item deletion/delivery > > js/PostfixMailQueue.js | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > > Summary over all repositories: > 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > _______________________________________________ pmg-devel mailing list pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-24 8:19 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-09-23 9:33 [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api/pmg-gui v2 0/2] fix #3450: batch deletion/delivery for postfix queue Hannes Laimer 2025-09-23 9:33 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api v2 1/1] fix #3450: api: queue: add POST endpoint for batch deletion/delivery Hannes Laimer 2025-09-23 13:22 ` Thomas Lamprecht 2025-09-24 5:43 ` Hannes Laimer 2025-09-24 8:19 ` Thomas Lamprecht 2025-09-23 9:33 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-gui v2 1/1] fix #3450: ui: queue: multi-select for item deletion/delivery Hannes Laimer 2025-09-23 13:27 ` Thomas Lamprecht 2025-09-24 7:14 ` [pmg-devel] superseded: [PATCH pmg-api/pmg-gui v2 0/2] fix #3450: batch deletion/delivery for postfix queue Hannes Laimer
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.