From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Jillian Morgan <jillian.morgan@primordial.ca>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH close #545, #5203: Allow bridges to have any valid interface name 0/2]
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 15:21:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f44d791-b924-4a21-a6a8-9573dee8bf8d@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240126171741.2251760-1-jillian.morgan@primordial.ca>
Hi!
Thanks for your patch! In general we like the idea of being able to
choose arbitrary names for bridges - but there's some additional things
to consider before we can apply those patches.
We are currently using prefixes for other types of interfaces as well.
With this patch series I could create bridges named 'bondX' which are
then picked up as a bond by the Web UI since the check for that in
INotify.pm is located before the check for bridges.
It would be a bit weird to name a bridge with the prefix bond
admittedly, but we should try to handle this more gracefully (iow. check
first whether an entry is a bridge and only then check for the other cases)
It might make sense to check for any possible conflicts with the SDN
config (running & staged).
I've added some additional comments inline - I can look into a v2
addressing those issues.
On 1/26/24 18:17, Jillian Morgan wrote:
> Allow bridges to have any valid interface name
>
> The patches are 1-line each, but across two repositories:
> proxmox-widget-toolkit (Toolkit.js)
> pve-common (INotify.pm)
>
> Jillian Morgan (2):
> Allow bridges to have any valid interface name
> Detect bridge interface by bridge_ports attribute
>
> src/Toolkit.js | 2 +-
> src/PVE/INotify.pm | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-21 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-26 17:17 Jillian Morgan
2024-01-26 17:17 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH close #545, #5203: Allow bridges to have any valid interface name 1/2] Jillian Morgan
2024-02-21 14:13 ` Stefan Hanreich
2024-01-26 17:17 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH close #545, #5203: Allow bridges to have any valid interface name 2/2] Jillian Morgan
2024-02-21 14:14 ` Stefan Hanreich
2024-02-21 14:23 ` Stefan Hanreich
2024-02-21 14:21 ` Stefan Hanreich [this message]
[not found] ` <df4fcfca9d62156ff3ea1a8826527a75d2603594.camel@groupe-cyllene.com>
2024-02-22 8:11 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH close #545, #5203: Allow bridges to have any valid interface name 0/2] Thomas Lamprecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5f44d791-b924-4a21-a6a8-9573dee8bf8d@proxmox.com \
--to=s.hanreich@proxmox.com \
--cc=jillian.morgan@primordial.ca \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.