all lists on lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland <devzero@web.de>
To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>,
	Maxime AUGER <m.auger@auranext.com>
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] bad ZFS performance with proxmox 6.2
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:54:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b443799-6007-212a-2b09-3833ee6a5555@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201006111213.9D6441764081@mailhost.auranext.com>

hi,

i remember having seen performance degradation reports on zfsonlinux
issue tracker, for example:

https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/8836


to blame zfs for this, you should first make sure it is not related to
driver issues or other kernel/disk related stuff, so i would recommend
comparing raw disk write performance first, to see if that may also make
a difference already.

furthermore, i would recommend using more data when doing write
performance comparison at such high troughput rate

regards
roland

Am 06.10.20 um 13:12 schrieb Maxime AUGER:
> Hello,
>
> We notice a significant difference in ZFS performances between proxmox 5.3-5 and proxmox 6.2.
> Last year when we tested proxmox5.3 on the HPE-DL360Gen9 hardware.
> This hardware is provided with 8 ssd disks (2x 200-GB OS dedicated mdadm RAID0 and 6x 1-TB ZFS pool for VMs storage)
> On ZFS pool we measured the peak value at 2.8GB/s (write)
> Actually on promox6 we measured the peak value at 1.5GB/s (write).
>
> One server, ITXPVE03 was running Initially on proxmox 5.3-5.
> peak performance 2.8GB/s
> Recently it has been reinstalled on proxmox 6.2 (from iso)
> peak performance 1.5GB/s
>
> to confirm this observation we have extended the checks to the 4 servers, identical hardware and low level software, BIOS and firmwares versions)
> The measurements confirm the statement
> All tests are done in serveurs idle state conditions with zero ative workload, all VMs/Containers shutdown.
> ZFS configuration are identical, no compression, no deduplicatation
>
> root@CLIPVE03(PVE6.2):~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/zfsraid10/iotest bs=1M count=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB, 1000 MiB) copied, 0.851028 s, 1.2 GB/s
>
> root@ITXPV03(PVE6.2):~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/zfsraid10/iotest bs=1M count=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB, 1000 MiB) copied, 0.722055 s, 1.5 GB/s
>
> root@CLIB05PVE02(PVE5.3-5):~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/zfsraid10/iotest bs=1M count=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB, 1000 MiB) copied, 0.397212 s, 2.6 GB/s
>
> root@CLIB05PVE01(PVE5.3-5):~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/zfsraid10/iotest bs=1M count=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB, 1000 MiB) copied, 0.39394 s, 2.7 GB/s
>
>
> At the ZFS level we can notice a difference in the version of zfsutils-linux
> 0.7.X on PVE5.3-5 (0.7.12)
> 0.8.X on PVE6.2 (same measure on 0.8.3 and 0.8.4)
>
> has anyone experienced this problem ?
>
> Maxime AUGER
> Network Team Leader
> AURANEXT
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>



  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-06 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-06 11:12 Maxime AUGER
2020-10-06 14:54 ` Roland [this message]
2020-10-06 15:59   ` Uwe Sauter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5b443799-6007-212a-2b09-3833ee6a5555@web.de \
    --to=devzero@web.de \
    --cc=m.auger@auranext.com \
    --cc=pve-user@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal