all lists on lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server] fix #4358: destroy_vm: Ignore 'suspended' lock when destroying VM
@ 2023-01-03 14:45 Stefan Hanreich
  2023-01-03 15:43 ` Thomas Lamprecht
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hanreich @ 2023-01-03 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pve-devel

Since there is not really a reason why hibernated VMs shouldn't be
able to be removed, we can safely ignore the 'suspended' lock in
destroy_vm.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
---
 PVE/QemuServer.pm | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
index 39fc6b0..5dae168 100644
--- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
+++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
@@ -2341,7 +2341,9 @@ sub destroy_vm {
 
     my $conf = PVE::QemuConfig->load_config($vmid);
 
-    PVE::QemuConfig->check_lock($conf) if !$skiplock;
+    if (!$skiplock && !PVE::QemuConfig->has_lock($conf, 'suspended')) {
+	PVE::QemuConfig->check_lock($conf);
+    }
 
     if ($conf->{template}) {
 	# check if any base image is still used by a linked clone
-- 
2.30.2




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server] fix #4358: destroy_vm: Ignore 'suspended' lock when destroying VM
  2023-01-03 14:45 [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server] fix #4358: destroy_vm: Ignore 'suspended' lock when destroying VM Stefan Hanreich
@ 2023-01-03 15:43 ` Thomas Lamprecht
  2023-01-03 15:52   ` Stefan Hanreich
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Lamprecht @ 2023-01-03 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Proxmox VE development discussion, Stefan Hanreich

Am 03/01/2023 um 15:45 schrieb Stefan Hanreich:
> Since there is not really a reason why hibernated VMs shouldn't be

IMO the key that this is safe is that there's now (well since quite a while)
two locks so that going into suspension and being actually suspended can be
differentiated via the `suspending` (not safe) and `suspended` (safe) locks.
Maybe that could be worked in the commit message (could do son on applying it)

> able to be removed, we can safely ignore the 'suspended' lock in
> destroy_vm.
Is the saved VM state then actually cleaned up?

Maybe a extra hint for such things in the web UI could be nice, but
must not necessarily be tied to this patch (series).

> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  PVE/QemuServer.pm | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> index 39fc6b0..5dae168 100644
> --- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> +++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> @@ -2341,7 +2341,9 @@ sub destroy_vm {
>  
>      my $conf = PVE::QemuConfig->load_config($vmid);
>  
> -    PVE::QemuConfig->check_lock($conf) if !$skiplock;
> +    if (!$skiplock && !PVE::QemuConfig->has_lock($conf, 'suspended')) {
> +	PVE::QemuConfig->check_lock($conf);
> +    }
>  
>      if ($conf->{template}) {
>  	# check if any base image is still used by a linked clone





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server] fix #4358: destroy_vm: Ignore 'suspended' lock when destroying VM
  2023-01-03 15:43 ` Thomas Lamprecht
@ 2023-01-03 15:52   ` Stefan Hanreich
  2023-01-03 16:10     ` Thomas Lamprecht
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hanreich @ 2023-01-03 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Lamprecht, Proxmox VE development discussion



On 1/3/23 16:43, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 03/01/2023 um 15:45 schrieb Stefan Hanreich:
>> Since there is not really a reason why hibernated VMs shouldn't be
> 
> IMO the key that this is safe is that there's now (well since quite a while)
> two locks so that going into suspension and being actually suspended can be
> differentiated via the `suspending` (not safe) and `suspended` (safe) locks.
> Maybe that could be worked in the commit message (could do son on applying it)
> 
>> able to be removed, we can safely ignore the 'suspended' lock in
>> destroy_vm.
> Is the saved VM state then actually cleaned up?

Yes, I just (double-)checked. Both disk image and suspended state get 
removed.

> 
> Maybe a extra hint for such things in the web UI could be nice, but
> must not necessarily be tied to this patch (series).

Should not be too hard to add, I'll make a v2 with the proposed changes 
to the commit message?

> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>>   PVE/QemuServer.pm | 4 +++-
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>> index 39fc6b0..5dae168 100644
>> --- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>> +++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>> @@ -2341,7 +2341,9 @@ sub destroy_vm {
>>   
>>       my $conf = PVE::QemuConfig->load_config($vmid);
>>   
>> -    PVE::QemuConfig->check_lock($conf) if !$skiplock;
>> +    if (!$skiplock && !PVE::QemuConfig->has_lock($conf, 'suspended')) {
>> +	PVE::QemuConfig->check_lock($conf);
>> +    }
>>   
>>       if ($conf->{template}) {
>>   	# check if any base image is still used by a linked clone
> 




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server] fix #4358: destroy_vm: Ignore 'suspended' lock when destroying VM
  2023-01-03 15:52   ` Stefan Hanreich
@ 2023-01-03 16:10     ` Thomas Lamprecht
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Lamprecht @ 2023-01-03 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Proxmox VE development discussion, Stefan Hanreich

Am 03/01/2023 um 16:52 schrieb Stefan Hanreich:
> 
> Yes, I just (double-)checked. Both disk image and suspended state get removed.
> 
>>
>> Maybe a extra hint for such things in the web UI could be nice, but
>> must not necessarily be tied to this patch (series).
> 
> Should not be too hard to add, I'll make a v2 with the proposed changes to the commit message?

Fine for me, note that I threw the idea of the hint mostly just out there,
so don't just do it because I asked for it ^^




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-03 16:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-03 14:45 [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server] fix #4358: destroy_vm: Ignore 'suspended' lock when destroying VM Stefan Hanreich
2023-01-03 15:43 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2023-01-03 15:52   ` Stefan Hanreich
2023-01-03 16:10     ` Thomas Lamprecht

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal