all lists on lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: superseded: [PATCH firewall/proxmox-firewall 0/2] fix bridge-nf-call settings during upgrades and handover
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 13:10:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c8b9d8b-4405-4333-b11c-9c83099499c2@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106112315.151144-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>

https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20261106121015.188115-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com/T/#t

On 11/6/26 12:23 PM, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> pve-firewall needs net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip{,6}tables set to 1, so
> that bridged guest traffic passes through iptables and conntrack. It
> sets them at runtime, while 10-pve.conf sets them to 0. Whenever the
> sysctl.d configuration is re-applied, e.g. when systemd-sysctl is
> restarted during a package upgrade, they drop back to 0 until the next
> update round of pve-firewall, up to 10 seconds later. Conntrack misses
> the bridged traffic in between, so packets of established connections
> get dropped as invalid afterwards.
> 
> The pve-firewall patch writes a drop-in to /run/sysctl.d while the
> iptables based firewall is active, so re-applying the configuration
> keeps the values at 1.
> 
> The proxmox-firewall patch fixes a related issue when switching to the
> nftables based firewall at runtime. It does not need the sysctls, but
> nothing reset them either, so the host and cluster forward rules also
> applied to bridged guest traffic until the next re-apply. It now
> re-applies the configured values once when it takes over, which keeps
> any override by the admin.
> 
> 
> pve-firewall:
> 
> Stefan Hanreich (1):
>   fix #8268: firewall: keep bridge-nf-call sysctls set on upgrade
> 
>  debian/control      |  4 ++--
>  src/PVE/Firewall.pm | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> proxmox-firewall:
> 
> Stefan Hanreich (1):
>   service: re-apply bridge sysctls when taking over from pve-firewall
> 
>  proxmox-firewall/src/bin/proxmox-firewall.rs | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> 
> 
> Summary over all repositories:
>   3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 





      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-06 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-06 11:23 [PATCH firewall/proxmox-firewall 0/2] fix bridge-nf-call settings during upgrades and handover Stefan Hanreich
2026-11-06 11:23 ` [PATCH pve-firewall 1/2] fix #8268: firewall: keep bridge-nf-call sysctls set on upgrade Stefan Hanreich
2026-11-06 11:23 ` [PATCH proxmox-firewall 2/2] service: re-apply bridge sysctls when taking over from pve-firewall Stefan Hanreich
2026-11-06 12:10 ` Stefan Hanreich [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4c8b9d8b-4405-4333-b11c-9c83099499c2@proxmox.com \
    --to=s.hanreich@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal