From: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: "Proxmox Backup Server development discussion"
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
"Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH v4 proxmox-backup 6/8] datastore: conditionally use custom GC atime cutoff if set
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 12:19:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bb0a633-b8b4-4b95-8ce4-d66f34ddcbe0@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1741257534.lanqwml83c.astroid@yuna.none>
On 3/6/25 12:00, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> On March 5, 2025 4:14 pm, Christian Ebner wrote:
>> Use the user configured atime cutoff over the default 24h 5m
>> margin if explicitly set, but only if the atime safety check is
>> enabled and succeeded. If the atime safety check is not enabled,
>> fallback to use the current default.
>>
>> Move the minimum atime calculation based on the atime cutoff to the
>> sweep_unused_chunks() callside and pass in the calculated values, as
>> to have the logic in the same place.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> changes since version 3:
>> - move min_atime calculation to the gc atime cutoff logic, pass the
>> min_atime to sweep_unused_chunks()
>>
>> pbs-datastore/src/chunk_store.rs | 10 +---------
>> pbs-datastore/src/datastore.rs | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/pbs-datastore/src/chunk_store.rs b/pbs-datastore/src/chunk_store.rs
>> index e482330b3..0b211a44c 100644
>> --- a/pbs-datastore/src/chunk_store.rs
>> +++ b/pbs-datastore/src/chunk_store.rs
>> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ impl ChunkStore {
>> pub fn sweep_unused_chunks(
>> &self,
>> oldest_writer: i64,
>> - phase1_start_time: i64,
>> + min_atime: i64,
>> status: &mut GarbageCollectionStatus,
>> worker: &dyn WorkerTaskContext,
>> ) -> Result<(), Error> {
>> @@ -374,14 +374,6 @@ impl ChunkStore {
>> use nix::sys::stat::fstatat;
>> use nix::unistd::{unlinkat, UnlinkatFlags};
>>
>> - let mut min_atime = phase1_start_time - 3600 * 24; // at least 24h (see mount option relatime)
>> -
>> - if oldest_writer < min_atime {
>> - min_atime = oldest_writer;
>> - }
>> -
>> - min_atime -= 300; // add 5 mins gap for safety
>> -
>> let mut last_percentage = 0;
>> let mut chunk_count = 0;
>>
>> diff --git a/pbs-datastore/src/datastore.rs b/pbs-datastore/src/datastore.rs
>> index b62ddc172..16767832e 100644
>> --- a/pbs-datastore/src/datastore.rs
>> +++ b/pbs-datastore/src/datastore.rs
>> @@ -1174,12 +1174,38 @@ impl DataStore {
>> DatastoreTuning::API_SCHEMA
>> .parse_property_string(gc_store_config.tuning.as_deref().unwrap_or(""))?,
>> )?;
>> - if tuning.gc_atime_safety_check.unwrap_or(true) {
>> + let gc_atime_safety_check = tuning.gc_atime_safety_check.unwrap_or(true);
>> + if gc_atime_safety_check {
>> self.inner.chunk_store.check_fs_atime_updates(true)?;
>> } else {
>> info!("Filesystem atime safety check disabled by datastore tuning options.");
>> + };
>> +
>> + let mut min_atime = tuning
>> + .gc_atime_cutoff
>> + .and_then(|cutoff| {
>> + if gc_atime_safety_check {
>> + info!("Using GC atime cutoff {cutoff}m.");
>> + // Account for the 5 min default offset subtracted below
>> + Some(phase1_start_time + 300 - cutoff as i64 * 60)
>> + } else {
>> + warn!(
>> + "Ignoring GC atime cutoff of {cutoff}m since atime check is disabled."
>
> should these be tied together like this? the other way round I can see
> at some point in the future.. (lowering the implicit default if the
> check is enabled), but why should a non-default cutoff be ignored
> because the check is also explicitly disabled?
Yes, as stated in the commit message my intention here is to fallback to
the current default if the check is explicitly disabled. So some form of
legacy mode if you will.
But now that you mention this, the other way around sounds more like
what is needed, agreed. So let's not make them depend on each other.
>
>> + );
>> + None
>> + }
>> + })
>> + .unwrap_or_else(|| {
>> + info!("Using default GC atime cutoff of 24h 5m");
>> + phase1_start_time - 3600 * 24
>> + });
>
> the logging here is a bit confusing.. does it really matter whether the
> cutoff is default or explicit?
Does not really mattern, no. It covered both cases above, default and
reset because the check flag not set. But since they will be no longer
intedependent, simply logging the used cutoff as such should be fine.
>
>> +
>> + if oldest_writer < min_atime {
>> + min_atime = oldest_writer;
>
> and if we log the above things, shouldn't we also log this?
>
> Maybe something like:
>
> GC atime cutoff XX minutes / <human readable min_atime timestamp>
> [Older backup writer started at <human readable timestamp> detected, extending cutoff to <timestamp>]
Acked, will add that as well.
>
>> }
>>
>> + min_atime -= 300; // add 5 mins gap for safety
>> +
>> info!("Start GC phase1 (mark used chunks)");
>>
>> self.mark_used_chunks(&mut gc_status, worker)?;
>> @@ -1187,7 +1213,7 @@ impl DataStore {
>> info!("Start GC phase2 (sweep unused chunks)");
>> self.inner.chunk_store.sweep_unused_chunks(
>> oldest_writer,
>> - phase1_start_time,
>> + min_atime,
>> &mut gc_status,
>> worker,
>> )?;
>> --
>> 2.39.5
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pbs-devel mailing list
>> pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pbs-devel mailing list
> pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 15:14 [pbs-devel] [PATCH v4 proxmox-backup 0/8] fix #5982: check atime update is honored Christian Ebner
2025-03-05 15:14 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v4 proxmox-backup 1/8] pbs api types: add garbage collection atime safety check flag Christian Ebner
2025-03-05 15:14 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v4 proxmox-backup 2/8] pbs api types: add option to set GC chunk cleanup atime cutoff Christian Ebner
2025-03-05 15:14 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v4 proxmox-backup 3/8] fix #5982: garbage collection: check atime updates are honored Christian Ebner
2025-03-06 11:02 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-06 11:30 ` Christian Ebner
2025-03-06 12:02 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-05 15:14 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v4 proxmox-backup 4/8] ui: expose GC atime safety check flag in datastore tuning options Christian Ebner
2025-03-05 15:14 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v4 proxmox-backup 5/8] docs: mention GC atime update check for " Christian Ebner
2025-03-05 15:14 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v4 proxmox-backup 6/8] datastore: conditionally use custom GC atime cutoff if set Christian Ebner
2025-03-06 11:00 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-06 11:19 ` Christian Ebner [this message]
2025-03-05 15:14 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v4 proxmox-backup 7/8] ui: expose GC atime cutoff in datastore tuning option Christian Ebner
2025-03-05 15:14 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v4 proxmox-backup 8/8] docs: mention gc-atime-cutoff as " Christian Ebner
2025-03-05 15:23 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v4 proxmox-backup 0/8] fix #5982: check atime update is honored Christian Ebner
2025-03-06 14:54 ` Christian Ebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2bb0a633-b8b4-4b95-8ce4-d66f34ddcbe0@proxmox.com \
--to=c.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal