* [pve-devel] [pve-docs] Correct the device declaration in the bonding example.
@ 2020-10-30 9:01 Wolfgang Link
2020-10-30 14:23 ` Thomas Lamprecht
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Link @ 2020-10-30 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pve-devel
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Link <w.link@proxmox.com>
---
pve-network.adoc | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/pve-network.adoc b/pve-network.adoc
index 294c201..692326f 100644
--- a/pve-network.adoc
+++ b/pve-network.adoc
@@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ iface eno1 inet manual
iface eno2 inet manual
+iface eno3 inet manual
+
auto bond0
iface bond0 inet static
slaves eno1 eno2
@@ -369,7 +371,7 @@ iface vmbr0 inet static
address 10.10.10.2
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 10.10.10.1
- bridge-ports eno1
+ bridge-ports eno3
bridge-stp off
bridge-fd 0
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [pve-devel] [pve-docs] Correct the device declaration in the bonding example.
2020-10-30 9:01 [pve-devel] [pve-docs] Correct the device declaration in the bonding example Wolfgang Link
@ 2020-10-30 14:23 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2020-11-02 6:38 ` Wolfgang Link
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Lamprecht @ 2020-10-30 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion, Wolfgang Link
On 30.10.20 10:01, Wolfgang Link wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Link <w.link@proxmox.com>
> ---
> pve-network.adoc | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/pve-network.adoc b/pve-network.adoc
> index 294c201..692326f 100644
> --- a/pve-network.adoc
> +++ b/pve-network.adoc
> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ iface eno1 inet manual
>
> iface eno2 inet manual
>
> +iface eno3 inet manual
> +
> auto bond0
> iface bond0 inet static
> slaves eno1 eno2
> @@ -369,7 +371,7 @@ iface vmbr0 inet static
> address 10.10.10.2
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> gateway 10.10.10.1
> - bridge-ports eno1
> + bridge-ports eno3
or bond0 ?
> bridge-stp off
> bridge-fd 0
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [pve-devel] [pve-docs] Correct the device declaration in the bonding example.
2020-10-30 14:23 ` Thomas Lamprecht
@ 2020-11-02 6:38 ` Wolfgang Link
2020-11-02 7:04 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Link @ 2020-11-02 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Lamprecht, Proxmox VE development discussion
Both is possible.
In the original version there where three nics used.
Personally, I don't like network setup with multiple IP addresses at different layers.
They are more complex and harder to debug.
> Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> hat am 30.10.2020 15:23 geschrieben:
>
>
> On 30.10.20 10:01, Wolfgang Link wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Link <w.link@proxmox.com>
> > ---
> > pve-network.adoc | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/pve-network.adoc b/pve-network.adoc
> > index 294c201..692326f 100644
> > --- a/pve-network.adoc
> > +++ b/pve-network.adoc
> > @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ iface eno1 inet manual
> >
> > iface eno2 inet manual
> >
> > +iface eno3 inet manual
> > +
> > auto bond0
> > iface bond0 inet static
> > slaves eno1 eno2
> > @@ -369,7 +371,7 @@ iface vmbr0 inet static
> > address 10.10.10.2
> > netmask 255.255.255.0
> > gateway 10.10.10.1
> > - bridge-ports eno1
> > + bridge-ports eno3
>
> or bond0 ?
>
> > bridge-stp off
> > bridge-fd 0
> >
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [pve-devel] applied: [pve-docs] Correct the device declaration in the bonding example.
2020-11-02 6:38 ` Wolfgang Link
@ 2020-11-02 7:04 ` Thomas Lamprecht
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Lamprecht @ 2020-11-02 7:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfgang Link, Proxmox VE development discussion
On 02.11.20 07:38, Wolfgang Link wrote:
> Both is possible.
>
> In the original version there where three nics used.
>
> Personally, I don't like network setup with multiple IP addresses at different layers.
> They are more complex and harder to debug.
after taking a look myself I'd say that the key point to add eno3 is
rather that we have a "Use a bond as bridge port" already after this
example.
So yes, patch is OK as is: applied, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-02 7:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-30 9:01 [pve-devel] [pve-docs] Correct the device declaration in the bonding example Wolfgang Link
2020-10-30 14:23 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2020-11-02 6:38 ` Wolfgang Link
2020-11-02 7:04 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal