all lists on lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: [RFC firewall 0/3] add triggers for PVE perl code updates
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 11:54:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260311105524.50117-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> (raw)

Similar to the services shipped by pve-manager, the firewall service
should also be reloaded when Perl packages like libpve-common-perl or
libpve-network-perl are updated. There are false positives too, like
libpve-storage-perl, and avoiding theses would require a new trigger
name specifically for firewall and activating that new trigger in all
its dependencies. But maybe that one is the better way? Happy to hear
opinions :)

A path-based interest is chosen following the same rationale as
pve-manager commit 27d1db3a ("triggers: add path-based trigger
interest").

Note that this is not prompted by an actual issue I encountered, but
I did notice it when the firewall was still running with some manually
added logging in Daemon.pm even after reinstalling pve-common. I was
surprised and I felt like it's worth discussing whether we want any
triggers for the firewall service.

pve-firewall:

Fiona Ebner (3):
  d/postinst: handled triggers by reloading service
  d/pve-firewall.triggers: add interest in PVE perl code updates
  d/pve-firewall.triggers: drop superfluous pve-api-updates activation

 debian/postinst              | 4 ++++
 debian/pve-firewall.triggers | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


Summary over all repositories:
  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

-- 
Generated by git-murpp 0.5.0




             reply	other threads:[~2026-03-11 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-11 10:54 Fiona Ebner [this message]
2026-03-11 10:54 ` [RFC firewall 1/3] d/postinst: handled triggers by reloading service Fiona Ebner
2026-03-11 10:54 ` [RFC firewall 2/3] d/pve-firewall.triggers: add interest in PVE perl code updates Fiona Ebner
2026-03-11 10:54 ` [RFC firewall 3/3] d/pve-firewall.triggers: drop superfluous pve-api-updates activation Fiona Ebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260311105524.50117-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com \
    --to=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal