From: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 10/21] compile ha rules to a more compact representation
Date: Mon,  3 Nov 2025 11:19:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251103102118.153666-11-d.kral@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251103102118.153666-1-d.kral@proxmox.com>
The initial implementation of fetching a ha resource's rules in the
scheduler and other users is rather inefficient as it needs to go
through the raw rules hash map and gathers quite a lot of information
which doesn't change unless the HA rules need to be re-translated
anyway.
Therefore add a compile stage when re-translating the HA rules, which
compiles each rule plugin's rules into a more compact data structure.
This reduces the unnecessary recomputation of invariant data done in the
hot path of the scheduler's select_service_node(...).
A benchmark done with NYTProf [0] shows the following runtime
improvement, where each duration is the average time needed per call.
The benchmark was done by starting up a 3-node cluster with 1200
configured HA resources, where each HA resource is in a node affinity
rule and a negative resource affinity to two other HA resources.
+----------------------------------+--------+-------+
| Function                         | Before | After |
+----------------------------------+--------+-------+
| select_service_node              | 10.5ms | 44µs  |
| get_node_affinity                | 5.26ms | 10µs  |
| get_resource_affinity            | 5.17ms | 12µs  |
+----------------------------------+--------+-------+
[0] https://metacpan.org/pod/Devel::NYTProf
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
---
changes since v2:
  - minor changes due to rebase
  - factor out $resource_affinity in get_resource_motion_info(...) to
    align it with other usages of these helpers and in preparation of
    another patch series which will use $node_affinity too
 src/PVE/HA/Config.pm                 |   9 ++-
 src/PVE/HA/Manager.pm                |  31 ++++----
 src/PVE/HA/Rules.pm                  |  59 +++++++++++++++
 src/PVE/HA/Rules/NodeAffinity.pm     |  80 ++++++++++----------
 src/PVE/HA/Rules/ResourceAffinity.pm | 105 ++++++++++++++-------------
 src/test/test_failover1.pl           |  15 +++-
 6 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/PVE/HA/Config.pm b/src/PVE/HA/Config.pm
index bd87a0ab..548a89e6 100644
--- a/src/PVE/HA/Config.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/HA/Config.pm
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ sub read_and_check_rules_config {
     return $rules;
 }
 
-sub read_and_check_effective_rules_config {
+sub read_and_compile_rules_config {
 
     my $rules = read_and_check_rules_config();
 
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ sub read_and_check_effective_rules_config {
 
     PVE::HA::Rules->transform($rules, $nodes);
 
-    return $rules;
+    return PVE::HA::Rules->compile($rules, $nodes);
 }
 
 sub write_rules_config {
@@ -391,8 +391,9 @@ sub get_resource_motion_info {
         my $ss = $manager_status->{service_status};
         my $ns = $manager_status->{node_status};
 
-        my $rules = read_and_check_effective_rules_config();
-        my ($together, $separate) = get_affinitive_resources($rules, $sid);
+        my $compiled_rules = read_and_compile_rules_config();
+        my $resource_affinity = $compiled_rules->{'resource-affinity'};
+        my ($together, $separate) = get_affinitive_resources($resource_affinity, $sid);
 
         for my $csid (sort keys %$together) {
             next if !defined($ss->{$csid});
diff --git a/src/PVE/HA/Manager.pm b/src/PVE/HA/Manager.pm
index a26bde76..e17e3209 100644
--- a/src/PVE/HA/Manager.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/HA/Manager.pm
@@ -126,12 +126,12 @@ sub flush_master_status {
 
 =head3 select_service_node(...)
 
-=head3 select_service_node($rules, $online_node_usage, $sid, $service_conf, $ss, $node_preference)
+=head3 select_service_node($compiled_rules, $online_node_usage, $sid, $service_conf, $ss, $node_preference)
 
 Used to select the best fitting node for the service C<$sid>, with the
-configuration C<$service_conf>, according to the rules defined in C<$rules>,
-available node utilization in C<$online_node_usage>, the service states in
-C<$ss> and the given C<$node_preference>.
+configuration C<$service_conf>, according to the rules defined in
+C<$compiled_rules>, available node utilization in C<$online_node_usage>, the
+service states in C<$ss> and the given C<$node_preference>.
 
 The C<$node_preference> can be set to:
 
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ The C<$node_preference> can be set to:
 =cut
 
 sub select_service_node {
-    my ($rules, $online_node_usage, $sid, $service_conf, $ss, $node_preference) = @_;
+    my ($compiled_rules, $online_node_usage, $sid, $service_conf, $ss, $node_preference) = @_;
 
     die "'$node_preference' is not a valid node_preference for select_service_node\n"
         if $node_preference !~ m/(none|best-score|try-next)/;
@@ -156,13 +156,15 @@ sub select_service_node {
     my $sd = $ss->{$sid};
     my ($current_node, $tried_nodes, $maintenance_fallback) =
         $sd->@{qw(node failed_nodes maintenance_node)};
+    my ($node_affinity, $resource_affinity) =
+        $compiled_rules->@{qw(node-affinity resource-affinity)};
 
     my $online_nodes = { map { $_ => 1 } $online_node_usage->list_nodes() };
-    my ($allowed_nodes, $pri_nodes) = get_node_affinity($rules, $sid, $online_nodes);
+    my ($allowed_nodes, $pri_nodes) = get_node_affinity($node_affinity, $sid, $online_nodes);
 
     return undef if !%$pri_nodes;
 
-    my ($together, $separate) = get_resource_affinity($rules, $sid, $ss, $online_nodes);
+    my ($together, $separate) = get_resource_affinity($resource_affinity, $sid, $ss, $online_nodes);
 
     # stay on current node if possible (avoids random migrations)
     if (
@@ -389,7 +391,8 @@ sub execute_migration {
 
     my ($haenv, $ss) = $self->@{qw(haenv ss)};
 
-    my ($together, $separate) = get_affinitive_resources($self->{rules}, $sid);
+    my $resource_affinity = $self->{compiled_rules}->{'resource-affinity'};
+    my ($together, $separate) = get_affinitive_resources($resource_affinity, $sid);
 
     for my $csid (sort keys %$separate) {
         next if !defined($ss->{$csid});
@@ -719,7 +722,7 @@ sub manage {
     PVE::HA::Groups::migrate_groups_to_resources($self->{groups}, $sc);
 
     if (
-        !$self->{rules}
+        !$self->{compiled_rules}
         || $has_changed_nodelist
         || $new_rules->{digest} ne $self->{last_rules_digest}
         || $self->{groups}->{digest} ne $self->{last_groups_digest}
@@ -731,9 +734,9 @@ sub manage {
         my $messages = PVE::HA::Rules->transform($new_rules, $nodes);
         $haenv->log('info', $_) for @$messages;
 
-        $self->{rules} = $new_rules;
+        $self->{compiled_rules} = PVE::HA::Rules->compile($new_rules, $nodes);
 
-        $self->{last_rules_digest} = $self->{rules}->{digest};
+        $self->{last_rules_digest} = $new_rules->{digest};
         $self->{last_groups_digest} = $self->{groups}->{digest};
         $self->{last_services_digest} = $services_digest;
     }
@@ -991,7 +994,7 @@ sub next_state_request_start {
 
     if ($self->{crs}->{rebalance_on_request_start}) {
         my $selected_node = select_service_node(
-            $self->{rules},
+            $self->{compiled_rules},
             $self->{online_node_usage},
             $sid,
             $cd,
@@ -1158,7 +1161,7 @@ sub next_state_started {
             }
 
             my $node = select_service_node(
-                $self->{rules},
+                $self->{compiled_rules},
                 $self->{online_node_usage},
                 $sid,
                 $cd,
@@ -1272,7 +1275,7 @@ sub next_state_recovery {
     my $fenced_node = $sd->{node}; # for logging purpose
 
     my $recovery_node = select_service_node(
-        $self->{rules},
+        $self->{compiled_rules},
         $self->{online_node_usage},
         $sid,
         $cd,
diff --git a/src/PVE/HA/Rules.pm b/src/PVE/HA/Rules.pm
index a075feac..69c53356 100644
--- a/src/PVE/HA/Rules.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/HA/Rules.pm
@@ -47,6 +47,12 @@ Each I<rule plugin> is required to implement the methods C<L<type()>>,
 C<L<properties()>>, and C<L<options>> from the C<L<PVE::SectionConfig>> to
 extend the properties of this I<base plugin> with plugin-specific properties.
 
+Each I<rule plugin> is required to implement the method
+C<L<< plugin_compile()|/$class->plugin_compile(...) >>> to distill a compiled
+representation of the more verbose C<$rules> from the config file, which is
+returned by C<L<< compile()|/$class->compile(...) >>> to be more appropriate
+and efficient for the scheduler and other users.
+
 =head2 REGISTERING CHECKS
 
 In order to C<L<< register checks|/$class->register_check(...) >>> for a rule
@@ -453,6 +459,59 @@ sub transform : prototype($$$) {
     return $messages;
 }
 
+=head3 $class->plugin_compile(...)
+
+=head3 $class->plugin_compile($rules, $nodes)
+
+B<MANDATORY:> Must be implemented in a I<rule plugin>.
+
+Called in C<$class->compile($rules, $nodes)> in order to get a more compact
+representation of the rule plugin's rules in C<$rules>, which holds only the
+relevant information for the scheduler and other users.
+
+C<$nodes> is a list of the configured cluster nodes.
+
+=cut
+
+sub plugin_compile {
+    my ($class, $rules, $nodes) = @_;
+
+    die "implement in subclass";
+}
+
+=head3 $class->compile(...)
+
+=head3 $class->compile($rules, $nodes)
+
+Compiles and returns a hash, where each key-value pair represents a rule
+plugin's more compact representation compiled from the more verbose rules
+defined in C<$rules>.
+
+C<$nodes> is a list of the configured cluster nodes.
+
+The transformation to the compact representation for each rule plugin is
+implemented in C<L<< plugin_compile()|/$class->plugin_compile(...) >>>.
+
+=cut
+
+sub compile {
+    my ($class, $rules, $nodes) = @_;
+
+    my $compiled_rules = {};
+
+    for my $type (@$types) {
+        my $plugin = $class->lookup($type);
+        my $compiled_plugin_rules = $plugin->plugin_compile($rules, $nodes);
+
+        die "plugin_compile(...) of type '$type' must return hash reference\n"
+            if ref($compiled_plugin_rules) ne 'HASH';
+
+        $compiled_rules->{$type} = $compiled_plugin_rules;
+    }
+
+    return $compiled_rules;
+}
+
 =head1 FUNCTIONS
 
 =cut
diff --git a/src/PVE/HA/Rules/NodeAffinity.pm b/src/PVE/HA/Rules/NodeAffinity.pm
index 111ff6fe..adef97d0 100644
--- a/src/PVE/HA/Rules/NodeAffinity.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/HA/Rules/NodeAffinity.pm
@@ -155,6 +155,40 @@ sub get_plugin_check_arguments {
     return $result;
 }
 
+sub plugin_compile {
+    my ($class, $rules, $nodes) = @_;
+
+    my $node_affinity = {};
+
+    PVE::HA::Rules::foreach_rule(
+        $rules,
+        sub {
+            my ($rule) = @_;
+
+            my $effective_nodes = dclone($rule->{nodes});
+
+            # add remaining nodes with low priority for non-strict node affinity
+            if (!$rule->{strict}) {
+                for my $node (@$nodes) {
+                    next if defined($effective_nodes->{$node});
+
+                    $effective_nodes->{$node} = { priority => -1 };
+                }
+            }
+
+            for my $sid (keys $rule->{resources}->%*) {
+                $node_affinity->{$sid} = {
+                    nodes => $effective_nodes,
+                };
+            }
+        },
+        type => 'node-affinity',
+        exclude_disabled_rules => 1,
+    );
+
+    return $node_affinity;
+}
+
 =head1 NODE AFFINITY RULE CHECKERS
 
 =cut
@@ -217,30 +251,10 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_check(
 
 =cut
 
-my $get_resource_node_affinity_rule = sub {
-    my ($rules, $sid) = @_;
-
-    # with the current restriction a resource can only be in one node affinity rule
-    my $node_affinity_rule;
-    PVE::HA::Rules::foreach_rule(
-        $rules,
-        sub {
-            my ($rule) = @_;
-
-            $node_affinity_rule = dclone($rule) if !$node_affinity_rule;
-        },
-        sid => $sid,
-        type => 'node-affinity',
-        exclude_disabled_rules => 1,
-    );
-
-    return $node_affinity_rule;
-};
-
-=head3 get_node_affinity($rules, $sid, $online_nodes)
+=head3 get_node_affinity($node_affinity, $sid, $online_nodes)
 
 Returns a list of two hashes representing the node affinity of C<$sid>
-according to the node affinity rules in C<$rules> and the available nodes in
+according to the node affinity C<$node_affinity> and the available nodes in
 the C<$online_nodes> hash.
 
 The first hash is a hash set of available nodes, i.e. nodes where the
@@ -252,30 +266,14 @@ If there are no available nodes at all, returns C<undef>.
 =cut
 
 sub get_node_affinity : prototype($$$) {
-    my ($rules, $sid, $online_nodes) = @_;
+    my ($node_affinity, $sid, $online_nodes) = @_;
 
-    my $node_affinity_rule = $get_resource_node_affinity_rule->($rules, $sid);
-
-    # default to a node affinity rule with all available nodes
-    if (!$node_affinity_rule) {
-        for my $node (keys %$online_nodes) {
-            $node_affinity_rule->{nodes}->{$node} = { priority => 0 };
-        }
-    }
-
-    # add remaining nodes with low priority for non-strict node affinity rules
-    if (!$node_affinity_rule->{strict}) {
-        for my $node (keys %$online_nodes) {
-            next if defined($node_affinity_rule->{nodes}->{$node});
-
-            $node_affinity_rule->{nodes}->{$node} = { priority => -1 };
-        }
-    }
+    return ($online_nodes, $online_nodes) if !defined($node_affinity->{$sid});
 
     my $allowed_nodes = {};
     my $prioritized_nodes = {};
 
-    while (my ($node, $props) = each %{ $node_affinity_rule->{nodes} }) {
+    while (my ($node, $props) = each $node_affinity->{$sid}->{nodes}->%*) {
         next if !defined($online_nodes->{$node}); # node is offline
 
         $allowed_nodes->{$node} = 1;
diff --git a/src/PVE/HA/Rules/ResourceAffinity.pm b/src/PVE/HA/Rules/ResourceAffinity.pm
index 4a6e8627..c44d4f0b 100644
--- a/src/PVE/HA/Rules/ResourceAffinity.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/HA/Rules/ResourceAffinity.pm
@@ -101,6 +101,35 @@ sub get_plugin_check_arguments {
     return $result;
 }
 
+sub plugin_compile {
+    my ($class, $rules, $nodes) = @_;
+
+    my $positive = {};
+    my $negative = {};
+
+    PVE::HA::Rules::foreach_rule(
+        $rules,
+        sub {
+            my ($rule, $ruleid) = @_;
+
+            my $affinity_set = $rule->{affinity} eq 'positive' ? $positive : $negative;
+
+            for my $sid (keys $rule->{resources}->%*) {
+                for my $csid (keys $rule->{resources}->%*) {
+                    $affinity_set->{$sid}->{$csid} = 1 if $csid ne $sid;
+                }
+            }
+        },
+        type => 'resource-affinity',
+        exclude_disabled_rules => 1,
+    );
+
+    return {
+        positive => $positive,
+        negative => $negative,
+    };
+}
+
 =head1 RESOURCE AFFINITY RULE CHECKERS
 
 =cut
@@ -404,12 +433,12 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_transform(sub {
 
 =cut
 
-=head3 get_affinitive_resources($rules, $sid)
+=head3 get_affinitive_resources($resource_affinity, $sid)
 
 Returns a list of two hash sets, where the first hash set contains the
 resources, which C<$sid> is positively affinitive to, and the second hash
 contains the resources, which C<$sid> is negatively affinitive to, acording to
-the resource affinity rules in C<$rules>.
+the resource's resource affinity in C<$resource_affinity>.
 
 Note that a resource C<$sid> becomes part of any negative affinity relation
 of its positively affinitive resources.
@@ -430,36 +459,20 @@ affinitive to C<'ct:200'> and C<'ct:201'>, the returned value will be:
 =cut
 
 sub get_affinitive_resources : prototype($$) {
-    my ($rules, $sid) = @_;
+    my ($resource_affinity, $sid) = @_;
 
-    my $together = {};
-    my $separate = {};
-
-    PVE::HA::Rules::foreach_rule(
-        $rules,
-        sub {
-            my ($rule, $ruleid) = @_;
-
-            my $affinity_set = $rule->{affinity} eq 'positive' ? $together : $separate;
-
-            for my $csid (sort keys %{ $rule->{resources} }) {
-                $affinity_set->{$csid} = 1 if $csid ne $sid;
-            }
-        },
-        sid => $sid,
-        type => 'resource-affinity',
-        exclude_disabled_rules => 1,
-    );
+    my $together = $resource_affinity->{positive}->{$sid} // {};
+    my $separate = $resource_affinity->{negative}->{$sid} // {};
 
     return ($together, $separate);
 }
 
-=head3 get_resource_affinity($rules, $sid, $ss, $online_nodes)
+=head3 get_resource_affinity($resource_affinity, $sid, $ss, $online_nodes)
 
 Returns a list of two hashes, where the first describes the positive resource
 affinity and the second hash describes the negative resource affinity for
-resource C<$sid> according to the resource affinity rules in C<$rules>, the
-service status C<$ss> and the C<$online_nodes> hash.
+resource C<$sid> according to the resource's resource affinity rules in
+C<$resource_affinity>, the service status C<$ss> and the C<$online_nodes> hash.
 
 For the positive resource affinity of a resource C<$sid>, each element in the
 hash represents an online node, where other resources, which C<$sid> is in
@@ -488,38 +501,32 @@ resource C<$sid> is in a negative affinity with, the returned value will be:
 =cut
 
 sub get_resource_affinity : prototype($$$$) {
-    my ($rules, $sid, $ss, $online_nodes) = @_;
+    my ($resource_affinity, $sid, $ss, $online_nodes) = @_;
 
     my $together = {};
     my $separate = {};
 
-    PVE::HA::Rules::foreach_rule(
-        $rules,
-        sub {
-            my ($rule) = @_;
+    my ($positive, $negative) = get_affinitive_resources($resource_affinity, $sid);
 
-            for my $csid (keys %{ $rule->{resources} }) {
-                next if $csid eq $sid;
+    my $get_used_service_nodes = sub {
+        my ($sid) = @_;
+        my ($state, $node, $target) = $ss->{$sid}->@{qw(state node target)};
+        return PVE::HA::Usage::get_used_service_nodes($online_nodes, $state, $node, $target);
+    };
 
-                my ($state, $node, $target) = $ss->{$csid}->@{qw(state node target)};
-                my ($current_node, $target_node) =
-                    PVE::HA::Usage::get_used_service_nodes($online_nodes, $state, $node, $target);
+    for my $csid (keys $positive->%*) {
+        my ($current_node, $target_node) = $get_used_service_nodes->($csid);
 
-                if ($rule->{affinity} eq 'positive') {
-                    $together->{$current_node}++ if defined($current_node);
-                    $together->{$target_node}++ if defined($target_node);
-                } elsif ($rule->{affinity} eq 'negative') {
-                    $separate->{$current_node} = 1 if defined($current_node);
-                    $separate->{$target_node} = 1 if defined($target_node);
-                } else {
-                    die "unimplemented resource affinity type $rule->{affinity}\n";
-                }
-            }
-        },
-        sid => $sid,
-        type => 'resource-affinity',
-        exclude_disabled_rules => 1,
-    );
+        $together->{$current_node}++ if defined($current_node);
+        $together->{$target_node}++ if defined($target_node);
+    }
+
+    for my $csid (keys $negative->%*) {
+        my ($current_node, $target_node) = $get_used_service_nodes->($csid);
+
+        $separate->{$current_node} = 1 if defined($current_node);
+        $separate->{$target_node} = 1 if defined($target_node);
+    }
 
     return ($together, $separate);
 }
diff --git a/src/test/test_failover1.pl b/src/test/test_failover1.pl
index 495d4b4b..1d336be0 100755
--- a/src/test/test_failover1.pl
+++ b/src/test/test_failover1.pl
@@ -21,11 +21,13 @@ node-affinity: prefer_node1
 	nodes node1
 EOD
 
+my $nodes = ['node1', 'node2', 'node3'];
+
+my $compiled_rules = PVE::HA::Rules->compile($rules, $nodes);
+
 # Relies on the fact that the basic plugin doesn't use the haenv.
 my $online_node_usage = PVE::HA::Usage::Basic->new();
-$online_node_usage->add_node("node1");
-$online_node_usage->add_node("node2");
-$online_node_usage->add_node("node3");
+$online_node_usage->add_node($_) for @$nodes;
 
 my $service_conf = {
     node => 'node1',
@@ -46,7 +48,12 @@ sub test {
     my $select_node_preference = $try_next ? 'try-next' : 'none';
 
     my $node = PVE::HA::Manager::select_service_node(
-        $rules, $online_node_usage, "$sid", $service_conf, $ss, $select_node_preference,
+        $compiled_rules,
+        $online_node_usage,
+        $sid,
+        $service_conf,
+        $ss,
+        $select_node_preference,
     );
 
     my (undef, undef, $line) = caller();
-- 
2.47.3
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-03 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-03 10:19 [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 00/21] HA rules fixes + performance improvements + cleanup Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:19 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 01/21] config: do not add ignored resources to dependent resources Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:19 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 02/21] manager: retranslate rules if nodes are added or removed Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:19 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 03/21] rules: factor out disjoint rules' resource set helper Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:19 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 04/21] rules: resource affinity: inter-consistency check with merged positive rules Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:19 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 05/21] rules: add merged positive resource affinity info in global checks Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 17:24   ` Michael Köppl
2025-11-03 10:19 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 06/21] rules: make rules sorting optional in foreach_rule helper Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:19 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 07/21] rename rule's canonicalize stage to transform stage Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:19 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 08/21] rules: make plugins register transformers instead of plugin_transform Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:19 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 09/21] rules: node affinity: decouple get_node_affinity helper from Usage class Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:19 ` Daniel Kral [this message]
2025-11-03 10:19 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 11/21] test: rules: use to_json instead of Data::Dumper for config output Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:19 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 12/21] test: rules: add compiled config output to rules config test cases Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:19 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 13/21] rules: node affinity: define node priority outside hash access Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:19 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 14/21] move minimum version check helper to ha tools Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:19 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 15/21] manager: move group migration cooldown variable into helper Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:20 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 16/21] api: status: sync active service counting with lrm's helper Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:20 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 17/21] manager: group migration: " Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:20 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 18/21] factor out counting of active services into helper Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:20 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 19/21] tree-wide: remove misused function prototype declaractions Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:20 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 20/21] rules: fix documentation for inter-rules checker subroutines Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 10:20 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 21/21] rules: add documentation about current feasibility check implementations Daniel Kral
2025-11-03 17:43 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 00/21] HA rules fixes + performance improvements + cleanup Michael Köppl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox
  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):
  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251103102118.153666-11-d.kral@proxmox.com \
    --to=d.kral@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY
  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
  Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
  before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.