From: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
To: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Cc: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [RFC proxmox-backup] drop exclusive lock for verify-after-complete
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:09:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230327130912.sok4n5x7quoxcj2p@casey.proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230227095012.291373-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
applied
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:50:12AM +0100, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> the backup is finished at that point, the only lock clash that is possible when
> dropping the exclusive and attempting to obtain a shared lock would be
>
> - the snapshot is pruned/removed
> - the backup is in a pre-upgrade process, and the post-upgrade process opens a reader
>
> the first case is OK, if the other invocation wins the race and removes the
> snapshot verification is pointless anyway.
>
> the second case means the snapshot is not verified directly after completion
> (this fact would be logged in the backup task log), but usable immediately for
> pulling/restoring/..
>
> this should decrease the chances of triggering the issues described in #4523
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> right now our locking helpers don't support a direct downgrade (or attempt to
> upgrade, for that matter). given that we don't have many use cases that require
up/downgrading existing locks is a weird thing to do anyway and either
ruins the queues (or fails) anyway...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-27 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-27 9:50 [pbs-devel] " Fabian Grünbichler
2023-03-27 13:09 ` Wolfgang Bumiller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230327130912.sok4n5x7quoxcj2p@casey.proxmox.com \
--to=w.bumiller@proxmox.com \
--cc=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.