* [pve-devel] [PATCH storage] rbd: unmap volume after rename
@ 2022-04-28 8:47 Fabian Ebner
2022-04-28 11:44 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fabian Ebner @ 2022-04-28 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pve-devel
When krbd is used, subsequent removal after an an operation
involving a rename could fail with
> librbd::image::PreRemoveRequest: 0x559b7506a470 \
> check_image_watchers: image has watchers - not removing
because the old mapping was still present.
For both operations with a rename, the owning guest should be offline,
but even if it weren't, unmap simply fails when the volume is in-use.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---
PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm b/PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm
index e9856a9..d71af36 100644
--- a/PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm
+++ b/PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm
@@ -482,6 +482,9 @@ sub create_base {
);
run_rbd_command($cmd, errmsg => "rbd rename '$name' error");
+ eval { $class->unmap_volume($storeid, $scfg, $volname); };
+ warn $@ if $@;
+
my $running = undef; #fixme : is create_base always offline ?
$class->volume_snapshot($scfg, $storeid, $newname, $snap, $running);
@@ -817,6 +820,9 @@ sub rename_volume {
errmsg => "could not rename image '${source_image}' to '${target_volname}'",
);
+ eval { $class->unmap_volume($storeid, $scfg, $source_volname); };
+ warn $@ if $@;
+
$base_name = $base_name ? "${base_name}/" : '';
return "${storeid}:${base_name}${target_volname}";
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH storage] rbd: unmap volume after rename
2022-04-28 8:47 [pve-devel] [PATCH storage] rbd: unmap volume after rename Fabian Ebner
@ 2022-04-28 11:44 ` Thomas Lamprecht
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Lamprecht @ 2022-04-28 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion, Fabian Ebner
On 28.04.22 10:47, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> When krbd is used, subsequent removal after an an operation
> involving a rename could fail with
>> librbd::image::PreRemoveRequest: 0x559b7506a470 \
>> check_image_watchers: image has watchers - not removing
> because the old mapping was still present.
>
> For both operations with a rename, the owning guest should be offline,
> but even if it weren't, unmap simply fails when the volume is in-use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
>
applied, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-28 11:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-28 8:47 [pve-devel] [PATCH storage] rbd: unmap volume after rename Fabian Ebner
2022-04-28 11:44 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal