From: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH access-control 1/4] assert tfa/user config lock order
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 13:49:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211110124904.164053-2-w.bumiller@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211110124904.164053-1-w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
---
src/PVE/AccessControl.pm | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/PVE/AccessControl.pm b/src/PVE/AccessControl.pm
index 0b00847..49cef94 100644
--- a/src/PVE/AccessControl.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/AccessControl.pm
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ use Digest::SHA;
use IO::File;
use File::stat;
use JSON;
+use Scalar::Util 'weaken';
use PVE::OTP;
use PVE::Ticket;
@@ -68,10 +69,20 @@ sub pve_verify_realm {
PVE::Auth::Plugin::pve_verify_realm(@_);
}
+# Locking both config files together is only ever allowed in one order:
+# 1) tfa config
+# 2) user config
+# If we permit the other way round, too, we might end up deadlocking!
+my $user_config_locked;
sub lock_user_config {
my ($code, $errmsg) = @_;
+ my $locked = 1;
+ $user_config_locked = \$locked;
+ weaken $user_config_locked; # make this scope guard signal safe...
+
cfs_lock_file("user.cfg", undef, $code);
+ $user_config_locked = undef;
if (my $err = $@) {
$errmsg ? die "$errmsg: $err" : die $err;
}
@@ -80,6 +91,9 @@ sub lock_user_config {
sub lock_tfa_config {
my ($code, $errmsg) = @_;
+ die "tfa config lock cannot be acquired while holding user config lock\n"
+ if ($user_config_locked && $$user_config_locked);
+
my $res = cfs_lock_file("priv/tfa.cfg", undef, $code);
if (my $err = $@) {
$errmsg ? die "$errmsg: $err" : die $err;
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-10 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-10 12:48 [pve-devel] [PATCH access-control + manager] tfa followup Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-11-10 12:49 ` Wolfgang Bumiller [this message]
2021-11-10 12:49 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH access-control 2/4] check enforced realm tfa type in new auth Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-11-10 12:49 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH access-control 3/4] d/control: add liburi-perl dependency Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-11-10 12:49 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH access-control 4/4] merge old user.cfg keys to tfa config when adding entries Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-11-10 12:49 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] depend on and use libjs-qrcodejs Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-11-11 7:38 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
2021-11-11 16:06 ` [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH access-control + manager] tfa followup Thomas Lamprecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211110124904.164053-2-w.bumiller@proxmox.com \
--to=w.bumiller@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal