From: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v3 2/2] ui: backup job details: show notification-mode instead of legacy keys
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 11:11:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <181907e1-8e1e-487a-ad3b-5574c12cf5f2@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9053b7a6-0199-41cc-9957-464b0ca0e365@proxmox.com>
On 2025-07-15 21:59, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 14.07.25 um 10:42 schrieb Lukas Wagner:
>> On 2025-07-14 10:30, Gabriel Goller wrote:
>
>>> Make we should change the Makefile to run `proxmox-biome check`?
>>
>> Maybe, but I think a separate make target could make more sense than including it
>> in `make check`. The latter is also run during a package build process and it would
>> be quite annoying to fail that because of a trivial formatting issue. We also don't do
>> that for Rust, neither for clippy nor rustfmt.
>
> +1
>
> If, we should IMO only warn on code failing a formatting check.
>
>> What definitely would make sense is to add biome format/check --write to the `make tidy`
>> target, at the moment we seem to only run perltidy there.
>
> Yeah, that's still missing. Any input on target name? I used `tidy` due to
> correlation with perltidy's name, but would something else be more sensible
> here?
I think `make tidy` is fine. Alternatives that come to mind are `make format` or `make fmt`.
I don't have too much of an opinion here, as long as we use the same target name across all relevant
repos.
--
- Lukas
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-16 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-09 8:14 [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-guest-common v3 1/1] backup job: remove 'notification-policy' and 'notification-target' options Lukas Wagner
2025-07-09 8:14 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v3 1/2] ui: remove handling of obsolete notification-policy/target settings Lukas Wagner
2025-07-11 12:34 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
2025-07-09 8:14 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v3 2/2] ui: backup job details: show notification-mode instead of legacy keys Lukas Wagner
2025-07-11 12:34 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
2025-07-11 15:04 ` [pve-devel] " Gabriel Goller
2025-07-14 7:26 ` Lukas Wagner
2025-07-14 8:30 ` Gabriel Goller
2025-07-14 8:42 ` Lukas Wagner
2025-07-15 19:59 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-07-16 9:11 ` Lukas Wagner [this message]
2025-07-11 12:34 ` [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH pve-guest-common v3 1/1] backup job: remove 'notification-policy' and 'notification-target' options Thomas Lamprecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=181907e1-8e1e-487a-ad3b-5574c12cf5f2@proxmox.com \
--to=l.wagner@proxmox.com \
--cc=g.goller@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.