From: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>,
Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>,
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu-server v2] fix #7119: qm cleanup: wait for process exiting for up to 30 seconds
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:20:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1770985110.nme4v4xomn.astroid@yuna.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ee8d206-36fd-4ade-893b-c7c2222a8883@proxmox.com>
On February 13, 2026 1:14 pm, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> Am 10.02.26 um 12:14 PM schrieb Dominik Csapak:
>> When qmeventd detects a vm exiting, it starts 'qm cleanup' to cleanup
>> files, executing hookscripts, etc.
>>
>> Since the vm process exits is sometimes not instant, wait up to 30
>> seconds here to start the cleanup process instead of immediately
>> aborting if the pid still exits. This prevented executing the hookscript
>> on the 'post-stop' phase.
>>
>> This can be easily reproduced by e.g. passing through a usb device,
>> which delays the qemu process exit for a few seconds.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> changes from v1:
>> * use correct while condition (time() is always >= $starttime)
>>
>> original comment:
>>
>> The 30 second timeout was arbitrarily chosen, but we could probably
>> start with something smaller, like 10 seconds? Could be adapted on
>> applying though.
>>
>> In my (short) tests the usb passthrough part only adds a single second,
>> but i can imagine different devices on other systems could block it for
>> much longer.
>>
>> src/PVE/CLI/qm.pm | 13 ++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/PVE/CLI/qm.pm b/src/PVE/CLI/qm.pm
>> index bdae9641..16875ed2 100755
>> --- a/src/PVE/CLI/qm.pm
>> +++ b/src/PVE/CLI/qm.pm
>> @@ -1101,8 +1101,19 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>> 60,
>> sub {
>> my $conf = PVE::QemuConfig->load_config($vmid);
>> +
>> + # wait for some timeout until vm process exits, since this might not be instant
>
> s/timeout/time/
>
> Nit: s/vm/the QEMU/
>
> Maybe add "after the QMP 'SHUTDOWN' event"?
>
>> + my $timeout = 30;
>> + my $starttime = time();
>> my $pid = PVE::QemuServer::check_running($vmid);
>> - die "vm still running\n" if $pid;
>> + warn "vm still running - waiting up to $timeout seconds\n" if $pid;
>
> While we're at it, we could improve the message here. Something like
> 'QEMU process $pid for VM $vmid still running (or newly started)'
> Having the PID is nice info for developers/support engineers and the
> case where a new instance is started before the cleanup was done is also
> possible.
>
> In fact, the case with the new instance is easily triggered by 'stop'
> mode backups. Maybe we should fix that up first before adding a timeout
> here?
>
> Feb 13 13:09:48 pve9a1 qm[92975]: <root@pam> end task
> UPID:pve9a1:00016B30:000CDF80:698F1485:qmshutdown:102:root@pam: OK
> Feb 13 13:09:48 pve9a1 systemd[1]: Started 102.scope.
> Feb 13 13:09:48 pve9a1 qmeventd[93079]: Starting cleanup for 102
> Feb 13 13:09:48 pve9a1 qmeventd[93079]: trying to acquire lock...
> Feb 13 13:09:48 pve9a1 vzdump[92895]: VM 102 started with PID 93116.
> Feb 13 13:09:48 pve9a1 qmeventd[93079]: OK
> Feb 13 13:09:48 pve9a1 qmeventd[93079]: vm still running
does this mean we should actually have some sort of mechanism similar to
the reboot flag to indicate a pending cleanup, and block/delay starts if
it is still set?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-13 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-10 11:15 Dominik Csapak
2026-02-12 20:33 ` Benjamin McGuire
2026-02-13 11:40 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2026-02-13 12:14 ` Fiona Ebner
2026-02-13 12:20 ` Fabian Grünbichler [this message]
2026-02-13 13:16 ` Fiona Ebner
2026-02-16 8:42 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2026-02-16 9:15 ` Fiona Ebner
2026-02-19 10:15 ` Dominik Csapak
2026-02-19 13:27 ` Fiona Ebner
2026-02-20 9:36 ` Dominik Csapak
2026-02-20 14:30 ` Fiona Ebner
2026-02-20 14:51 ` Dominik Csapak
2026-02-13 12:22 ` Dominik Csapak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1770985110.nme4v4xomn.astroid@yuna.none \
--to=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
--cc=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.