From: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC qemu-server] fix #6935: vmstatus: fallback to RSS in case of KSM usage
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 15:20:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1764080351.cnbokh9rxb.astroid@yuna.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fe6a9b5-3950-4195-9aaf-8112fcf68aa4@proxmox.com>
On November 25, 2025 3:08 pm, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 25.11.25 um 14:51 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler:
>> after a certain amount of KSM sharing, PSS lookups become prohibitively
>> expensive. fallback to RSS (which was used before) in that case, to avoid
>> vmstatus calls blocking for long periods of time.
>>
>> I benchmarked this with 3 VMs running with different levels of KSM sharing. in
>> the output below, "merged pages" refers to the contents of
>> /proc/$pid/ksm_merging_pages, extract_pss is the parsing code for cumulative
>> PSS of a VM cgroup isolated, extract_rss is the parsing code for cumulative RSS
>> of a VM cgroup isolated, qm_status_stock is `qm status $vmid --verbose`, and
>> qm_status_patched is `perl -I./src/PVE ./src/bin/qm status $vmid --verbose`
>> with this patch applied.
>>
>> [..]
>>
>> Fixes: d426de6c7d81a4d04950f2eaa9afe96845d73f7e ("vmstatus: add memhost for host view of vm mem consumption")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>> the threshold is a bit arbitrary, we could also consider setting it
>> lower to be on the safe side, or make it relative to the total
>> number of pages of memory..
>>
>> one issue with this approach is that if KSM is disabled later on and
>> all the merging is undone, the problematic behaviour remains, and
>> there is - AFAICT - no trace of this state in `ksm_stat` of the
>> process or elsewhere. the behaviour goes away if the VM is stopped
>> and started again. instead of doing a per-pid decision, we might
>> want to opt for setting a global RSS fallback in case KSM is
>> detected as active on the host?
>
> One can now also disable KSM per VM, so that config property should be
> checked too if we go that route.
right, if the running config has that set, we should be allowed to query
PSS.. that actually might be the nicest solution?
>> we should of course also investigate further whether this is fixable
>> or improvable on the kernel side..
>>
>> src/PVE/QemuServer.pm | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/src/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>> index a7fbec14..82e9c004 100644
>> --- a/src/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>> +++ b/src/PVE/QemuServer.pm
>> @@ -2333,19 +2333,28 @@ my sub get_vmid_total_cgroup_memory_usage {
>> if (my $procs_fh = IO::File->new("/sys/fs/cgroup/qemu.slice/${vmid}.scope/cgroup.procs", "r")) {
>
>
> Just to be sure: The stats from memory.current or memory.stat inside the
> /sys/fs/cgroup/qemu.slice/${vmid}.scope/ directory is definitively not
> enough for our usecases?
well, if we go for RSS they might be, for PSS they are not, since that
doesn't exist there?
>
>> while (my $pid = <$procs_fh>) {
>> chomp($pid);
>> + my $filename = 'smaps_rollup';
>> + my $extract_usage_re = qr/^Pss:\s+([0-9]+) kB$/;
>>
>> - open(my $smaps_fh, '<', "/proc/${pid}/smaps_rollup")
>> + my $ksm_pages = PVE::Tools::file_read_firstline("/proc/$pid/ksm_merging_pages");
>> + # more than 1G shared via KSM, smaps_rollup will be slow, fall back to RSS
>> + if ($ksm_pages && $ksm_pages > 1024 * 1024 / 4) {
>
> Hmm, can lead to sudden "jumps" in the rrd metrics data, but that's rather
> independent from the decision expression but always the case if we switch
> between that. Dropping this stat again completely could be also an option..
> A middle ground could be to just display it for the live view with such a
> heuristic as proposed here.
having the live view and the metrics use different semantics seems kinda
confusing tbh..
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-25 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-25 13:51 Fabian Grünbichler
2025-11-25 14:08 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-11-25 14:20 ` Fabian Grünbichler [this message]
2025-11-25 15:21 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-11-25 17:21 ` Aaron Lauterer
2025-11-25 18:17 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-11-26 8:27 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-11-25 14:53 ` Aaron Lauterer
2025-11-28 10:37 ` [pve-devel] superseded: " Fabian Grünbichler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1764080351.cnbokh9rxb.astroid@yuna.none \
--to=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.