From: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 2/4] api/cli: add enroll-efi-keys endpoint
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 14:09:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1763471319.7o0f3g0oz5.astroid@yuna.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01f6f78e-aef1-4302-a9c0-805ae7a85517@proxmox.com>
On November 18, 2025 2:07 pm, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 18.11.25 um 13:58 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler:
>>> + my $updated = PVE::QemuServer::OVMF::ensure_ms_2023_cert_enrolled(
>>> + $storecfg, $vmid, $conf->{efidisk0},
>>> + );
>> this can block and/or take a while, so shouldn't this endpoint fork a
>> task worker?
>>
>> and do we really need a new endpoint for this, couldn't we do it in the
>> config update and let the UI set the corresponding EFI disk flag as an
>> (async) update?
>
> Talked with Fiona off-list about this.
>
> I'd for now move the endpoint to the CLI only. We plan re-use recently
> added efidisk flag to provide a mechanism where the user can request enrollment
> by setting the flag to a new value. This will be refused to get hot-applied, thus
> stays a pending change in the config and will applied on the next fresh start.
> In the UI we can then also display a nice hint w.r.t. users needing to be
> prepared if they use Bitlocker, one option for that is executing the following
> command in the Windows VM before shutting it down:
>
> manage-bde -protectors -disable <drive>
sounds like a good plan - that CLI endpoint can then be converted to
become
load_config
get efidisk
call update config with modified efidisk, protected by digest
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-18 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-18 12:34 [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIS qemu-server 0/4] vm start: ovmf: do not auto-enroll Microsoft UEFI CA 2023 Fiona Ebner
2025-11-18 12:34 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 1/4] ovmf: enroll ms 2023 cert: change QSD ID to allow calling outside of VM start Fiona Ebner
2025-11-18 12:34 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 2/4] api/cli: add enroll-efi-keys endpoint Fiona Ebner
2025-11-18 12:58 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-11-18 13:07 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-11-18 13:09 ` Fabian Grünbichler [this message]
2025-11-18 14:11 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-11-18 12:34 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 3/4] ovmf: factor out helper for checking whether MS 2023 certificate should be enrolled Fiona Ebner
2025-11-18 12:34 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 4/4] vm start: ovmf: do not auto-enroll Microsoft UEFI CA 2023 Fiona Ebner
2025-11-18 13:30 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIS qemu-server 0/4] " Thomas Lamprecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1763471319.7o0f3g0oz5.astroid@yuna.none \
--to=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.