From: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox 2/2] pbs api types: add option to set GC chunk cleanup wait period
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 09:12:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1741161467.n7xtjkjof1.astroid@yuna.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c0d6e54-1f71-4c05-b4f6-00779b8d2673@proxmox.com>
On March 4, 2025 5:49 pm, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 04.03.25 um 17:37 schrieb Christian Ebner:
>> On 3/4/25 17:01, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>>> Would be fine by me to reducing the minimum to zero. And the extra 5
>>> minutes are "just to be sure" safety-margin, not a requirement for
>>> anything IIRC.
>>
>> Discussed this with Fabian rather extensively today. Only reason to keep
>> a small safety margin here is for small time drift in case of remote
>> storages (if they use their local time for timestamps).
>
> Ah, you mean network attached remote storage, but while your reasons
> below are fine, doing this for time drifts is IMO not really strong
> argumentation, as if one allows for no time synchronisation then there
> won't be a limit to the drift amount, but ...
actually, the translation from UTIME_NOW to timestamp happens in the
local kernel, so time drift shouldn't matter much here..
>> But this can be much lower, would opt for 1 minute to stay within the
>> minute range.
>>
>> Also, atime always uses the coarse resolution for timestamp updates,
>> that will also not change with the multi-grained timestamp resolutions
>> in https://origin.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.13/filesystems/multigrain-ts.html
>> So this has to be taken into account for the atime update check, and
>> since setting the atime into the past will introduce other error modes
>> (permissions, fs impl, ...), a short wait of a 1 second in-between must
>> be used.
>>
>> Also, there is no distinction to be made between filesystems mounted
>> with atime and relatime, if the explicit atime update fails, the GC
>
> ... this actually is a strong argument, so I'm fine with a Minute as
> minimum.
but this is still a valid reason to leave a small buffer :)
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-19 16:48 [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox proxmox-backup 0/9] fix #5892: check atime update is honored Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox 1/2] pbs api types: add check garbage collection atime updates flag Christian Ebner
2025-03-03 12:58 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-03 13:20 ` Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox 2/2] pbs api types: add option to set GC chunk cleanup wait period Christian Ebner
2025-03-03 12:58 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-03 13:30 ` Christian Ebner
2025-03-03 15:30 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-04 16:01 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-03-04 16:37 ` Christian Ebner
2025-03-04 16:49 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-03-04 17:03 ` Christian Ebner
2025-03-05 7:57 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-05 8:12 ` Fabian Grünbichler [this message]
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 3/9] datastore: move utimensat() related constants to module scope Christian Ebner
2025-03-03 13:03 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-03 13:32 ` Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 4/9] fix #5982: garbage collection: check atime updates are honored Christian Ebner
2025-03-03 13:51 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-03 15:23 ` Christian Ebner
2025-03-03 15:50 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-03 16:09 ` Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 5/9] ui: expose atime update check flag in datastore tuning options Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 6/9] docs: mention GC atime update check for " Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 7/9] datastore: conditionally use custom GC wait period if set Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 8/9] ui: expose GC wait period in datastore tuning option Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 9/9] docs: mention gc-wait-period option as datastore tuning parameter Christian Ebner
2025-03-04 18:38 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox proxmox-backup 0/9] fix #5892: check atime update is honored Christian Ebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1741161467.n7xtjkjof1.astroid@yuna.none \
--to=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=c.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.