From: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox 2/2] pbs api types: add option to set GC chunk cleanup wait period
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 08:57:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1741161268.p5t203w27h.astroid@yuna.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c0d6e54-1f71-4c05-b4f6-00779b8d2673@proxmox.com>
On March 4, 2025 5:49 pm, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 04.03.25 um 17:37 schrieb Christian Ebner:
>> Also, there will be no upper limit for the gc-atime-safety-margin, as
>> Fabian pointed out correctly, setting this to large values might be
>> desired to avoid data loss if something is off, and one notices from
>> e.g. the pending removals.
>
> I'm rather a fan of _some_ limits even if only to be proven wrong by user
> demand to go over that, but then we actually know the use case. As until
> now we got no request at all for this to be higher, IIRC, I'd go for two
> days.
>
> Data loss is prevented by additional copies on other servers and mediums
> (keyword: tape or soon s3) not some rather internal GC cut-off that
> provides no nice mechanism to recover any data from it, so I also do
> not really buy that it will be used as that in practice, we certainly
> should not advertise it as candidate for that.
that's true, keeping the chunks for a longer period just makes
recovering from an accidental "over-pruning" much faster (by syncing
just the metadata back from whichever offsite copy), it doesn't
allow recovering on its own without an extra copy.
so if your datastore has the headroom, bumping the limit to a week for
example and monitoring your GC stats to notice pending removal outliers
can save you days of copying chunks back..
it's probably not a very common use case though, and temporarily or
permanently reducing it down to a very low bound will probably be the
common (and maybe future default) setting ;)
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-19 16:48 [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox proxmox-backup 0/9] fix #5892: check atime update is honored Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox 1/2] pbs api types: add check garbage collection atime updates flag Christian Ebner
2025-03-03 12:58 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-03 13:20 ` Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox 2/2] pbs api types: add option to set GC chunk cleanup wait period Christian Ebner
2025-03-03 12:58 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-03 13:30 ` Christian Ebner
2025-03-03 15:30 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-04 16:01 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-03-04 16:37 ` Christian Ebner
2025-03-04 16:49 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-03-04 17:03 ` Christian Ebner
2025-03-05 7:57 ` Fabian Grünbichler [this message]
2025-03-05 8:12 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 3/9] datastore: move utimensat() related constants to module scope Christian Ebner
2025-03-03 13:03 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-03 13:32 ` Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 4/9] fix #5982: garbage collection: check atime updates are honored Christian Ebner
2025-03-03 13:51 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-03 15:23 ` Christian Ebner
2025-03-03 15:50 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-03-03 16:09 ` Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 5/9] ui: expose atime update check flag in datastore tuning options Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 6/9] docs: mention GC atime update check for " Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 7/9] datastore: conditionally use custom GC wait period if set Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 8/9] ui: expose GC wait period in datastore tuning option Christian Ebner
2025-02-19 16:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 9/9] docs: mention gc-wait-period option as datastore tuning parameter Christian Ebner
2025-03-04 18:38 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox proxmox-backup 0/9] fix #5892: check atime update is honored Christian Ebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1741161268.p5t203w27h.astroid@yuna.none \
--to=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=c.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.