all lists on lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-firewall 1/1] rules: allow vital ICMP(v6) types
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 14:54:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1720616074.rw29f4wcsv.astroid@yuna.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240610125238.328376-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>

On June 10, 2024 2:52 pm, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> There are certain ICMP messages that should always pass through a
> firewall irregardless of any other rules. This is particularly
> important for ICMPv6. While we already handled NDP, there are certain
> control messages that should always be able to pass through any
> firewall, according to RFC 4890.
> 
> For ICMP we additionally allow 'Source Quench' as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
> ---
> While Source Quench is deprecated, there might be niche use cases
> using it and allowing it shouldn't really hurt so I've thrown it into
> the mix as well.
> 
>  .../resources/proxmox-firewall.nft            | 22 +++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft b/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft
> index 537ba88..ea2cd7d 100644
> --- a/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft
> +++ b/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ add chain inet proxmox-firewall allow-ndp-out
>  add chain inet proxmox-firewall block-ndp-out
>  add chain inet proxmox-firewall block-conntrack-invalid
>  add chain inet proxmox-firewall block-smurfs
> +add chain inet proxmox-firewall allow-icmp
>  add chain inet proxmox-firewall log-drop-smurfs
>  add chain inet proxmox-firewall default-in
>  add chain inet proxmox-firewall default-out
> @@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ add chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests allow-ndp-out
>  add chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests block-ndp-out
>  add chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests allow-ra-out
>  add chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests block-ra-out
> +add chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests allow-icmp
>  add chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests do-reject
>  add chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests vm-out {type filter hook prerouting priority 0; policy accept;}
>  add chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests vm-in {type filter hook postrouting priority 0; policy accept;}
> @@ -47,6 +49,7 @@ flush chain inet proxmox-firewall allow-ndp-out
>  flush chain inet proxmox-firewall block-ndp-out
>  flush chain inet proxmox-firewall block-conntrack-invalid
>  flush chain inet proxmox-firewall block-smurfs
> +flush chain inet proxmox-firewall allow-icmp
>  flush chain inet proxmox-firewall log-drop-smurfs
>  flush chain inet proxmox-firewall default-in
>  flush chain inet proxmox-firewall default-out
> @@ -63,6 +66,7 @@ flush chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests allow-ndp-out
>  flush chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests block-ndp-out
>  flush chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests allow-ra-out
>  flush chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests block-ra-out
> +flush chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests allow-icmp
>  flush chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests do-reject
>  flush chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests vm-out
>  flush chain bridge proxmox-firewall-guests vm-in
> @@ -175,9 +179,16 @@ table inet proxmox-firewall {
>          drop
>      }
>  
> +    chain allow-icmp {
> +        icmp type { destination-unreachable, source-quench, time-exceeded } accept
> +        # based on RFC 4890 - NDP is handled separately
> +        icmpv6 type { destination-unreachable, packet-too-big, time-exceeded, parameter-problem } accept
> +    }
> +
>      chain default-in {
>          iifname "lo" accept
>  
> +        jump allow-icmp
>          ct state related,established accept
>  
>          meta l4proto igmp accept
> @@ -185,8 +196,6 @@ table inet proxmox-firewall {
>          tcp dport { 8006, 5900-5999, 3128, 22 } jump accept-management
>          udp dport 5405-5412 accept
>  
> -        meta l4proto icmp icmp type { destination-unreachable, time-exceeded } accept
> -
>          # Drop Microsoft SMB noise
>          udp dport { 135, 137-139, 445 } goto do-reject
>          udp sport 137 udp dport 1024-65535 goto do-reject
> @@ -203,6 +212,7 @@ table inet proxmox-firewall {
>      chain default-out {
>          oifname "lo" accept
>  
> +        jump allow-icmp
>          ct state vmap { invalid : drop, established : accept, related : accept }
>      }
>  
> @@ -284,6 +294,12 @@ table bridge proxmox-firewall-guests {
>          icmpv6 type { nd-router-advert, nd-redirect } drop
>      }
>  
> +    chain allow-icmp {
> +        icmp type { destination-unreachable, source-quench, time-exceeded } accept
> +        # based on RFC 4890 - NDP is handled separately
> +        icmpv6 type { destination-unreachable, packet-too-big, time-exceeded, parameter-problem } accept
> +    }
> +
>      chain do-reject {
>          meta pkttype broadcast drop
>          ip saddr 224.0.0.0/4 drop
> @@ -297,12 +313,14 @@ table bridge proxmox-firewall-guests {
>  
>      chain vm-out {
>          type filter hook prerouting priority 0; policy accept;
> +        jump allow-icmp
>          ether type != arp ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : drop }
>          iifname vmap @vm-map-out
>      }
>  
>      chain vm-in {
>          type filter hook postrouting priority 0; policy accept;
> +        jump allow-icmp
>          ether type != arp ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : drop }
>          ether type arp accept
>          oifname vmap @vm-map-in
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel


      reply	other threads:[~2024-07-10 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-10 12:52 [pve-devel] " Stefan Hanreich
2024-07-10 12:54 ` Fabian Grünbichler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1720616074.rw29f4wcsv.astroid@yuna.none \
    --to=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal