From: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 qemu-server 2/2] remote-migration: add target-cpu param
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 15:14:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1682514292.71raew01tr.astroid@yuna.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230425165233.3745210-3-aderumier@odiso.com>
On April 25, 2023 6:52 pm, Alexandre Derumier wrote:
> This patch add support for remote migration when target
> cpu model is different.
>
> The target vm is restart after the migration
so this effectively introduces a new "hybrid" migration mode ;) the
changes are a bit smaller than I expected (in part thanks to patch #1),
which is good.
there are semi-frequent requests for another variant (also applicable to
containers) in the form of a two phase migration
- storage migrate
- stop guest
- incremental storage migrate
- start guest on target
given that it might make sense to save-guard this implementation here,
and maybe switch to a new "mode" parameter?
online => switching CPU not allowed
offline or however-we-call-this-new-mode (or in the future, two-phase-restart) => switching CPU allowed
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Derumier <aderumier@odiso.com>
> ---
> PVE/API2/Qemu.pm | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> PVE/CLI/qm.pm | 6 ++++++
> PVE/QemuMigrate.pm | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm b/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm
> index 587bb22..6703c87 100644
> --- a/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm
> +++ b/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm
> @@ -4460,6 +4460,12 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> optional => 1,
> default => 0,
> },
> + 'target-cpu' => {
> + optional => 1,
> + description => "Target Emulated CPU model. For online migration, the storage is live migrate, but the memory migration is skipped and the target vm is restarted.",
> + type => 'string',
> + format => 'pve-vm-cpu-conf',
> + },
> 'target-storage' => get_standard_option('pve-targetstorage', {
> completion => \&PVE::QemuServer::complete_migration_storage,
> optional => 0,
> @@ -4557,11 +4563,14 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> raise_param_exc({ 'target-bridge' => "failed to parse bridge map: $@" })
> if $@;
>
> + my $target_cpu = extract_param($param, 'target-cpu');
this is okay
> +
> die "remote migration requires explicit storage mapping!\n"
> if $storagemap->{identity};
>
> $param->{storagemap} = $storagemap;
> $param->{bridgemap} = $bridgemap;
> + $param->{targetcpu} = $target_cpu;
but this is a bit confusing with the variable/hash key naming ;)
> $param->{remote} = {
> conn => $conn_args, # re-use fingerprint for tunnel
> client => $api_client,
> @@ -5604,6 +5613,15 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> PVE::QemuServer::nbd_stop($state->{vmid});
> return;
> },
> + 'restart' => sub {
> + PVE::QemuServer::vm_stop(undef, $state->{vmid}, 1, 1);
> + my $info = PVE::QemuServer::vm_start_nolock(
> + $state->{storecfg},
> + $state->{vmid},
> + $state->{conf},
> + );
> + return;
> + },
> 'resume' => sub {
> if (PVE::QemuServer::Helpers::vm_running_locally($state->{vmid})) {
> PVE::QemuServer::vm_resume($state->{vmid}, 1, 1);
> diff --git a/PVE/CLI/qm.pm b/PVE/CLI/qm.pm
> index c3c2982..06c74c1 100755
> --- a/PVE/CLI/qm.pm
> +++ b/PVE/CLI/qm.pm
> @@ -189,6 +189,12 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> optional => 1,
> default => 0,
> },
> + 'target-cpu' => {
> + optional => 1,
> + description => "Target Emulated CPU model. For online migration, the storage is live migrate, but the memory migration is skipped and the target vm is restarted.",
> + type => 'string',
> + format => 'pve-vm-cpu-conf',
> + },
> 'target-storage' => get_standard_option('pve-targetstorage', {
> completion => \&PVE::QemuServer::complete_migration_storage,
> optional => 0,
> diff --git a/PVE/QemuMigrate.pm b/PVE/QemuMigrate.pm
> index e182415..04f8053 100644
> --- a/PVE/QemuMigrate.pm
> +++ b/PVE/QemuMigrate.pm
> @@ -731,6 +731,11 @@ sub cleanup_bitmaps {
> sub live_migration {
> my ($self, $vmid, $migrate_uri, $spice_port) = @_;
>
> + if($self->{opts}->{targetcpu}){
> + $self->log('info', "target cpu is different - skip live migration.");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> my $conf = $self->{vmconf};
>
> $self->log('info', "starting online/live migration on $migrate_uri");
> @@ -995,6 +1000,7 @@ sub phase1_remote {
> my $remote_conf = PVE::QemuConfig->load_config($vmid);
> PVE::QemuConfig->update_volume_ids($remote_conf, $self->{volume_map});
>
> + $remote_conf->{cpu} = $self->{opts}->{targetcpu};
do we need permission checks here (or better, somewhere early on, for doing this here)
> my $bridges = map_bridges($remote_conf, $self->{opts}->{bridgemap});
> for my $target (keys $bridges->%*) {
> for my $nic (keys $bridges->{$target}->%*) {
> @@ -1354,6 +1360,21 @@ sub phase2 {
> live_migration($self, $vmid, $migrate_uri, $spice_port);
>
> if ($self->{storage_migration}) {
> +
> + #freeze source vm io/s if target cpu is different (no livemigration)
> + if ($self->{opts}->{targetcpu}) {
> + my $agent_running = $self->{conf}->{agent} && PVE::QemuServer::qga_check_running($vmid);
> + if ($agent_running) {
> + print "freeze filesystem\n";
> + eval { mon_cmd($vmid, "guest-fsfreeze-freeze"); };
> + die $@ if $@;
die here
> + } else {
> + print "suspend vm\n";
> + eval { PVE::QemuServer::vm_suspend($vmid, 1); };
> + warn $@ if $@;
but warn here?
I'd like some more rationale for these two variants, what are the pros
and cons? should we make it configurable?
> + }
> + }
> +
> # finish block-job with block-job-cancel, to disconnect source VM from NBD
> # to avoid it trying to re-establish it. We are in blockjob ready state,
> # thus, this command changes to it to blockjob complete (see qapi docs)
> @@ -1608,6 +1629,10 @@ sub phase3_cleanup {
> # clear migrate lock
> if ($tunnel && $tunnel->{version} >= 2) {
> PVE::Tunnel::write_tunnel($tunnel, 10, "unlock");
> + if ($self->{opts}->{targetcpu}) {
> + $self->log('info', "target cpu is different - restart target vm.");
> + PVE::Tunnel::write_tunnel($tunnel, 10, 'restart');
> + }
>
> PVE::Tunnel::finish_tunnel($tunnel);
> } else {
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-26 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-25 16:52 [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 qemu-server 0/2] remote-migration: migration with different cpu Alexandre Derumier
2023-04-25 16:52 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 qemu-server 1/2] migration: move livemigration code in a dedicated sub Alexandre Derumier
2023-04-25 16:52 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 qemu-server 2/2] remote-migration: add target-cpu param Alexandre Derumier
2023-04-26 13:14 ` Fabian Grünbichler [this message]
2023-04-27 5:50 ` DERUMIER, Alexandre
2023-04-27 7:32 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2023-04-28 6:43 ` DERUMIER, Alexandre
2023-04-28 9:12 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2023-04-29 7:57 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2023-05-02 8:30 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2023-09-28 14:58 ` DERUMIER, Alexandre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1682514292.71raew01tr.astroid@yuna.none \
--to=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.