From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yew-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BCD41FF165
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:42:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 68D371D603;
	Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:42:05 +0100 (CET)
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: yew-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:42:00 +0100
Message-Id: <20250129094200.811682-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
In-Reply-To: <20250129094200.811682-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20250129094200.811682-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [selection.rs]
Subject: [yew-devel] [PATCH yew-widget-toolkit 2/2] state: selection: make
 selection interface more consistent
X-BeenThere: yew-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yew framework devel list at Proxmox <yew-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/yew-devel>, 
 <mailto:yew-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/yew-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:yew-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:yew-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yew-devel>, 
 <mailto:yew-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Yew framework devel list at Proxmox <yew-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: yew-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "yew-devel" <yew-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

due to the interior mutability of th Selection (it uses Rc<RefCell<>>),
we don't need the selection to be mutable when we select something. This
is reflected in in the interface for e.g. `select()` and `toggle()`
which only take a `&self`. For `bulk_select()` the same logic can be
applied, but it still took a `&mut self` which was not a problem, but it
was unnecessary. To make it more consistent, simply change from `&mut
self` to `&self`.

Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
---
 src/state/selection.rs | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/state/selection.rs b/src/state/selection.rs
index 21e8e85..6866436 100644
--- a/src/state/selection.rs
+++ b/src/state/selection.rs
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ impl Selection {
     /// # Panics
     ///
     /// If multiselect is false.
-    pub fn bulk_select(&mut self, map: HashSet<Key>) {
+    pub fn bulk_select(&self, map: HashSet<Key>) {
         self.inner.borrow_mut().bulk_select(map);
         self.notify_listeners();
     }
-- 
2.39.5



_______________________________________________
yew-devel mailing list
yew-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yew-devel