From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yew-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D011FF16E
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:41:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 12F381A4E3;
	Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:41:50 +0100 (CET)
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: yew-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:41:46 +0100
Message-Id: <20250120124146.2952068-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -1.231 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_DBL_SPAM 2.5 Contains a spam URL listed in the Spamhaus DBL blocklist
 [tasks.rs]
Subject: [yew-devel] [PATCH yew-comp] tasks: remove unnecessary 'round'
X-BeenThere: yew-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yew framework devel list at Proxmox <yew-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/yew-devel>, 
 <mailto:yew-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/yew-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:yew-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:yew-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yew-devel>, 
 <mailto:yew-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Yew framework devel list at Proxmox <yew-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: yew-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "yew-devel" <yew-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

this would only make sense if there were some milliseconds set,
but even then we want to truncate the number. So simply remove the
round, since `f64 as u64` does that already

Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
---
 src/tasks.rs | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/tasks.rs b/src/tasks.rs
index 56da7dd..1b65c8e 100644
--- a/src/tasks.rs
+++ b/src/tasks.rs
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ impl LoadableComponent for ProxmoxTasks {
             since.set_hours(0);
             since.set_minutes(0);
             since.set_seconds(0);
-            let since = (since.get_time() / 1000.0).round() as u64;
+            let since = (since.get_time() / 1000.0) as u64;
             filter["since"] = since.into();
         }
 
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ impl LoadableComponent for ProxmoxTasks {
             until.set_hours(23);
             until.set_minutes(59);
             until.set_seconds(59);
-            let until = (until.get_time() / 1000.0).round() as u64;
+            let until = (until.get_time() / 1000.0) as u64;
             filter["until"] = until.into();
         }
 
-- 
2.39.5



_______________________________________________
yew-devel mailing list
yew-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yew-devel