From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E55A86262C for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 18:46:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C07291C732 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 18:46:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [IPv6:2001:1418:10:5::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 4920B1C70D for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 18:46:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by picard.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 10) id B92A63CA17A; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 18:46:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from news by eraldo.lilliput.linux.it with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1nMCbS-0008JD-2n for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 18:36:02 +0100 From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:14:57 +0100 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: References: <4535ei-8j11.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it> X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1645464807 31843 192.168.1.24 (21 Feb 2022 17:33:27 GMT) To: GM X-Mailer: tin/2.4.4-20191224 ("Millburn") (Linux/5.4.0-100-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com In-Reply-To: ; from SmartGate on Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 18:36:02PM +0100 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.627 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 1.592 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [PVE-User] 2 host cluster, direct link: best configuration? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 17:46:41 -0000 Mandi! GM In chel di` si favelave... > I'd personally use option 1, dedicated nic(s) or vlans for LAN and Corosync > network.Then I'd use the dedicated 10G link only for storage replication. > All 3 networks would be setup on different network subnets. Storage > replication uses "migration network" for the replication, so you could > setup that on the dedicated 10G link, so that it does not interfere with > the corosync/lan traffic. Migration network can be setup either via the > datacenter.cfg or via the web gui (Datacenter -> Options -> Migration > settings). Cool! Thanks for the hint! -- Non sara` il canto delle sirene che ci innamorera` noi lo conosciamo bene, l'abbiamo sentito gia` (F. De Gregori)