From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CCA57209D for ; Sat, 21 May 2022 10:10:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 417052271A for ; Sat, 21 May 2022 10:10:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [IPv6:2001:1418:10:5::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 64CE322706 for ; Sat, 21 May 2022 10:10:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by picard.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 10) id 9A2963CAB2D; Sat, 21 May 2022 10:10:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from news by eraldo.lilliput.linux.it with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1nsK7d-0000cw-Vf for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Sat, 21 May 2022 10:06:01 +0200 From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 13:22:03 +0200 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1653119239 32672 192.168.1.24 (21 May 2022 07:47:19 GMT) X-Mailer: tin/2.4.4-20191224 ("Millburn") (Linux/5.4.0-110-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.338 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 1.049 Date: is 12 to 24 hours before Received: date JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: [PVE-User] Experimenting with bond on a non-LACP switch... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 08:10:42 -0000 I'm doing some experimentation on a switch that seems does not support LACP, even thus claim that; is a Netgear GS724Tv2: https://www.downloads.netgear.com/files/GDC/GS724Tv2/enus_ds_gs724t.pdf data sheet say: Port Trunking - Manual as per IEEE802.3ad Link Aggregation and 'IEEE802.3ad Link Aggregation' is LACP, right? Anyway, i'm experimenting a bit with other bonding mode, having (un)expected results and troubles, but in: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Network_Configuration#_linux_bond i've stumble upon that sentence: If you intend to run your cluster network on the bonding interfaces, then you have to use active-passive mode on the bonding interfaces, other modes are unsupported. What exactly mean?! Thanks. -- Molti italiani sognavano di vedere Berlusconi in un cellulare, prima o poi... (Stardust®, da i.n.n-a)