From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C36CA72D05 for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 23:40:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B09672327F for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 23:40:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [IPv6:2001:1418:10:5::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 26F4723274 for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 23:40:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by picard.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 10) id 5343C3CAC3E; Tue, 24 May 2022 23:40:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from news by eraldo.lilliput.linux.it with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ntcC9-0007sO-Bp for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Tue, 24 May 2022 23:36:01 +0200 From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 23:17:12 +0200 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: References: X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1653427306 30106 192.168.1.24 (24 May 2022 21:21:46 GMT) To: Laurent Dumont X-Mailer: tin/2.4.4-20191224 ("Millburn") (Linux/5.4.0-113-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com In-Reply-To: ; from SmartGate on Tue, May 24, 2022 at 23:36:01PM +0200 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.197 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Experimenting with bond on a non-LACP switch... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 21:40:17 -0000 Mandi! Laurent Dumont In chel di` si favelave... > There is this old thread with a similar discussion : > https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/cluster-lacp.90668/ Apart that i have other clusters where corosync run against LACP bonds without roubles, i've a little simpler question: >> If you intend to run your cluster network on the bonding >> interfaces, then you have to use active-passive mode on the bonding >> interfaces, other modes are unsupported. What is 'active-passive'?! Is the same of 'active-backup'? seems a terminology inconsistency to me... -- Se non trovi nessuno vuol dire che siamo scappati alle sei-shell (bash, tcsh,csh...) (Possi)