From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CF911FF16F for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 22:10:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 697CC11605; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 22:10:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 18:37:44 +0200 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: References: X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1759261422 1058449 192.168.1.45 (30 Sep 2025 19:43:42 GMT) To: Alwin Antreich via pve-user X-Mailer: tin/2.6.4-20240224 ("Banff") (Linux/6.14.0-32-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com In-Reply-To: ; from SmartGate on Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 22:06:10PM +0200 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.471 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 1.592 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] ZFS Upgrade... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" Mandi! Alwin Antreich via pve-user In chel di` si favelave... >>So, implicitly you confirm that it is GRUB that have some incompatibilities, >>not GRUB in legacy mode... I've understood well? > To my understanding, yes. Historically grub didn't (or still doesn't) support all features of a zfs pool on root. That's why the installer selects grub or systemd-boot [0] depending on system. So, practically: 1) if i use systemd-boot i'm safe and i can safely upgrade boot zpool 2) if i use GRUB, both in: 2a) legacy or 2b) UEFI mode, i'm in danger and if i upgrade boot pool, system get unbootable. Clearly, if i have a system taht boot in UEFI GRUB, i can upgrade bootloader to systemd-boot (How?). Correct? Thanks. -- _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user