From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69B3698A5B for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:40:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 470281E32A for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:40:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:40:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by picard.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 10) id D31E83CBB5B; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:40:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from news by eraldo.lilliput.linux.it with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1preNN-0007YA-MT for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:36:01 +0200 From: Marco Gaiarin Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 12:20:08 +0200 Organization: Il gaio usa sempre TIN per le liste, fallo anche tu!!! Message-ID: References: <6nj5hj-3a81.ln1@hermione.lilliput.linux.it> X-Trace: eraldo.lilliput.linux.it 1682512339 28769 192.168.24.2 (26 Apr 2023 12:32:19 GMT) To: Eneko Lacunza via pve-user X-Mailer: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-71-generic (x86_64)) X-Gateway-System: SmartGate 1.4.5 Cc: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com In-Reply-To: ; from SmartGate on Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 14:36:01PM +0200 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.245 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL 0.5 SPF set to ?all KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [PVE-User] DELL PowerEdge T440/PERC H750 and embarassing HDD performance... X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 12:40:15 -0000 Mandi! Eneko Lacunza via pve-user In chel di` si favelave... > What disk model? HGST HUS726T4TAL > sdc has only one backing HDD right? Yes, it is called 'NonRAID' in newer PERC lingo; seems a RAID0 configuration but with some more 'insight'... > 84 IOPS is not much, but I don't think you can get much more from an HDD > with random RW... > PERC controller is quite new, maybe driver in PVE 7 is more optimized... Uh, oh... never minded about that. There's some way to at least test PVE7 kernel with PVE6? -- chi si convertiva nel novanta ne era dispensato nel novantuno (F. De Andre`)