From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62C441FF2AE for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 21:28:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 04D5F3887A; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 21:28:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 21:28:49 +0200 To: David der Nederlanden | ITTY , Proxmox VE user list References: <6aee1ef2-47f5-4d1c-8600-88cd796be6e7@dkfz-heidelberg.de> <7de79cbf-90d0-40e2-87ec-dde2f6b21f0c@email.android.com> In-Reply-To: <7de79cbf-90d0-40e2-87ec-dde2f6b21f0c@email.android.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Post: From: Bastian Sebode via pve-user Precedence: list Cc: Bastian Sebode X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list List-Help: Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Mapping of VLAN tags to Linux bridges: Is that possible? Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2887439678398455234==" Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" --===============2887439678398455234== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBBA6C2466 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 21:28:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A4D713883B for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 21:28:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from enkidu.linet-services.de (enkidu.linet-services.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c0:fb01::6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 21:28:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPV6:2001:9e8:68d8:9100:78a2:435c:a36d:95c4] (unknown [IPv6:2001:9e8:68d8:9100:78a2:435c:a36d:95c4]) by enkidu.bs.linet-services.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1B1215304C; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 21:28:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linet-services.de; s=mail2019122001; t=1721676529; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lcVX/8evLzhUd2Q2uTKWyUmiJnzI807iXwzc/sJg0Dk=; b=Q4JU4uUl9DFPHAJ6VSOV91xoKbj12nZLlbgfOgdEsKXeG3oUJ5DVvmihejL7ym0KmQEUpB NRJ85s0wx9q+sK98RzTU80LF3JYKZjeOkUfIBMfvVe2MwCl/UwUeQBcpbVGyTL9lHCprfn 9Yq0WR/kg+GP5IuToKuVJ/CFH/l5Corhm2p5SaW9EoWcjUqwkuxRYmgxFGQnxNgzumE8jE Q4IbAJhYBQUwR7/qP4+HFzqfE2UmobnXMzv1HsOWmEs7pPSmiE6BXTOvxZrxjqpILLR2hR JIAhxVPnDimnMB06KqKxU7pLgf08xiMOC7y2wVRTPrJGTsCt9JMXoFCU/xhC5Q== Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 21:28:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Mapping of VLAN tags to Linux bridges: Is that possible? To: David der Nederlanden | ITTY , Proxmox VE user list References: <6aee1ef2-47f5-4d1c-8600-88cd796be6e7@dkfz-heidelberg.de> <7de79cbf-90d0-40e2-87ec-dde2f6b21f0c@email.android.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Bastian Sebode In-Reply-To: <7de79cbf-90d0-40e2-87ec-dde2f6b21f0c@email.android.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Hi David, thanks for the clarification. Off course it has to be done on all nodes. I should have a closer look on SDN soon. ;-) Regards Bastian On 22.07.24 21:23, David der Nederlanden | ITTY wrote: > Hi Bastian, > > This is a good way too indeed, but it has to be done on each node and > be exactly the same, now with SDN you can manage this from a cluster > perspective, which is a great advancement and makes it less complex (I > think, as we manage it per VM). > > Kind regards > David > > On 22 Jul 2024 21:18, Bastian Sebode via pve-user > wrote: > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user -- Bastian Sebode Fachinformatiker Systemintegration LINET Services GmbH | Cyriaksring 10a | 38118 Braunschweig Tel. 0531-180508-0 | Fax 0531-180508-29 | http://www.linet-services.de LINET in den sozialen Netzwerken: www.twitter.com/linetservices | www.facebook.com/linetservices Wissenswertes aus der IT-Welt: www.linet-services.de/blog/ Geschäftsführung: Timo Springmann, Mirko Savic und Moritz Bunkus HR B 9170 Amtsgericht Braunschweig USt-IdNr. DE 259 526 516 --===============2887439678398455234== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user --===============2887439678398455234==--