From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 642761FF161 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:42:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BC4C71F1E5; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:42:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:42:09 +0200 To: Proxmox VE user list In-Reply-To: <4sidql-6r83.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> References: <4e2222b8-f423-41e3-a6fb-522a6f792f0b@gilouweb.com> <4d28ql-5ua2.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> <4sidql-6r83.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Post: From: Alwin Antreich via pve-user Precedence: list Cc: Alwin Antreich X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list List-Help: Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Analysis of free space... Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7151904154023112087==" Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" --===============7151904154023112087== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49B87D65FB for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:42:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1FAEC1F135 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:42:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.antreich.com (mx.antreich.com [173.249.42.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:42:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.antreich.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.antreich.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3F8DE764103 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:42:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antreich.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:from :from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to :subject:subject:to:to; s=2025; bh=Dh8x9Ot5F0zOOKnR0yihir/8qGcn/ ob65irBLx+tick=; b=zEoB1Lst7ZEQ2Z501gdEuPuiAwDBbtDTus3eFLeIV/7HW bQpKEGyBP4xKyY96KQdmJXCC0+TL88RaQsRxO1iTx6KXckcGfKwFPvbxAxmXYRR9 L3H1I2OhIx462DNC0eJAm00mRC9uRDAHRl1gKEXXXaszMsc4BdeoXtZetCMjhNZC c2wv9AYVd7iJ27cM3tYFQ5wVJ2ES8T0IpzS+g41f93FSff24fNjc/HdPim0N7GkS 7OyBdDMUFN/S7Vy2WtjbQSQMDT9k8cIDyoMvVD5jfVMR9YA67aovwo2GwRnUNTrq eVJmif0wRs3aM2bSdxlZyk6tRznrjsiKtdD14N2ZA== Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 17:42:09 +0200 From: Alwin Antreich To: Proxmox VE user list Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Analysis of free space... In-Reply-To: <4sidql-6r83.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> References: <4e2222b8-f423-41e3-a6fb-522a6f792f0b@gilouweb.com> <4d28ql-5ua2.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> <4sidql-6r83.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it> Message-ID: <9EB24CE1-C837-48F1-A938-8B38DECEA40B@antreich.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.064 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy POISEN_SPAM_PILL 0.1 Meta: its spam POISEN_SPAM_PILL_1 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [antreich.com] On 24 September 2025 18:29:26 CEST, Marco Gaiarin wrote: >Mandi! Marco Gaiarin > In chel di` si favelave=2E=2E=2E > >> Uh, wait=2E=2E=2E effectively we forgot to enable 'discard' on volumes,= and we have >> enabled afterward (but rebooted the VM)=2E >> I'll check refreservation property and report back=2E > >No, volumes seems have all refreservation to 'none', as expected; current >situation is: > > root@lamprologus:~# zfs list | grep ^rpool-data > rpool-data 54=2E2T 3=2E84T 171K /rpool-data > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-0 1=2E11T 3=2E84T 1=2E11T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-1 2=2E32T 3=2E84T 2=2E32T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-10 1=2E82T 3=2E84T 1=2E82T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-11 2=2E03T 3=2E84T 2=2E03T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-12 1=2E96T 3=2E84T 1=2E96T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-13 2=2E48T 3=2E84T 2=2E48T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-14 2=2E21T 3=2E84T 2=2E21T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-15 2=2E42T 3=2E84T 2=2E42T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-16 2=2E15T 3=2E84T 2=2E15T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-17 2=2E14T 3=2E84T 2=2E14T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-18 3=2E39T 3=2E84T 3=2E39T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-19 3=2E40T 3=2E84T 3=2E40T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-2 1=2E32T 3=2E84T 1=2E32T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-20 3=2E36T 3=2E84T 3=2E36T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-21 2=2E50T 3=2E84T 2=2E50T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-22 3=2E22T 3=2E84T 3=2E22T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-23 2=2E73T 3=2E84T 2=2E73T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-24 2=2E53T 3=2E84T 2=2E53T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-3 213K 3=2E84T 213K - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-4 213K 3=2E84T 213K - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-5 2=2E33T 3=2E84T 2=2E33T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-6 2=2E28T 3=2E84T 2=2E28T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-7 2=2E13T 3=2E84T 2=2E13T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-8 2=2E29T 3=2E84T 2=2E29T - > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-9 2=2E11T 3=2E84T 2=2E11T - > >and a random volume (but all are similar): > > root@lamprologus:~# zfs get all rpool-data/vm-100-disk-18 | grep refrese= rvation > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-18 refreservation none = default > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-18 usedbyrefreservation 0B = - > >Another strange thing is that all are 2TB volumes: > > root@lamprologus:~# cat /etc/pve/qemu-server/100=2Econf | grep vm-100-di= sk-19 > scsi20: rpool-data:vm-100-disk-19,backup=3D0,discard=3Don,replicate=3D0,= size=3D2000G > >but: > > root@lamprologus:~# zfs list rpool-data/vm-100-disk-19 > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > rpool-data/vm-100-disk-19 3=2E40T 3=2E84T 3=2E40T - > >why 'USED' is 3=2E40T? Snapshots by any chance? Cheers, Alwin Hi Marco, --===============7151904154023112087== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user --===============7151904154023112087==--