From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFFA51FF15E for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 16:13:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 81F4B27928; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 16:13:08 +0100 (CET) To: "Proxmox VE user list" Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 14:42:16 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Post: From: Mark Schouten via pve-user Precedence: list Cc: Mark Schouten , Alexandre de Rumier X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Mark Schouten , Proxmox VE user list List-Help: Subject: [PVE-User] Volume chain snapshotting Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8867578104056884818==" Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" --===============8867578104056884818== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EF56D0E1D for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 16:13:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EBAF5278D7 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 16:12:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from kerio.tuxis.nl (kerio.tuxis.nl [31.3.111.57]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 16:12:35 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tuxis.nl; s=mail; h=from:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type; bh=RflP6bQlOyk2MVJab6zaGoJpLS/3lfNiC6Zy9vHY2jo=; b=FUjFzuQTACUp88SV9grT4QjrsVhyWRiZz4nLgkPRP0jV6HetxLsZZeNlaEbaqJ2Rc2xrUN0p1WEJA Gk39kkWmASrHvNo0JD1YWP+cjXtP9uPFjNTp61wXB9b4UfB6jBQqk9GO/sTr7j5IJR6bztSqvoJfsY bk0+uq+MDpHZFeU5M84WMTJf+lXCHXXE/f50PCGFaGWE/pbRocfxWtQmL4ndZgmOAvvzIydyuyT9Wz OxwZvKW7UjDBbutT2BsaDekY5aPSlU3ANiUqdX9xW+0BfNBzDooEC39uFtHmvesYGd0nyd3FsupsfS J5f+mL+f8JHIb0SC3YZgq1nXKZHorDg== X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.3 tests=AWL: 0.032, BAYES_00: -1.665, HTML_MESSAGE: 0.001, CUSTOM_RULE_FROM: ALLOW, TOTAL_SCORE: -1.632,autolearn=ham X-Footer: dHV4aXMubmw= Received: from [IPv6:2a03:7900:64::1001] ([2a03:7900:64::1001]) (authenticated user mark@tuxis.nl) by kerio.tuxis.nl (Kerio Connect 10.0.8 patch 1) with ESMTPSA (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)); Mon, 24 Nov 2025 15:42:22 +0100 From: "Mark Schouten" To: "Proxmox VE user list" Subject: Volume chain snapshotting Cc: "Alexandre de Rumier" Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 14:42:16 +0000 Message-Id: Reply-To: "Mark Schouten" User-Agent: eM_Client/10.3.2622.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.022 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [tuxis.nl] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Hi all, Since PVE9, we have Volume Chain Snapshotting. The documentation states:=20 'Enabling or disabling this flag only affects newly created virtual disk=20 volumes.=E2=80=99 Two questions: 1: Are there plans to make it possible to convert existing LVM Backed=20 storages with images that already exist? Or is there an idea how we can=20 convert existing images? 2: Why is this in status =E2=80=99Technology Preview=E2=80=99? What are the = risks that=20 are in the back of the heads of the developers? Or is it mainly =E2=80=99th= ere=20 might be bugs, but we expect dataconsistency to be OK=E2=80=99? Thanks, =E2=80=94 Mark Schouten CTO, Tuxis B.V. +31 318 200208 / mark@tuxis.nl --===============8867578104056884818== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user --===============8867578104056884818==--