From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40D3E1FF394
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 09:17:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6F3671BCBF;
Mon, 3 Jun 2024 09:17:33 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 09:17:21 +0200
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
References: <0744b185-2d3b-4722-a1c8-6a9b388c5eef@suma-informatika.hr>
In-Reply-To: <0744b185-2d3b-4722-a1c8-6a9b388c5eef@suma-informatika.hr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <mailman.382.1717399052.319.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
From: Eneko Lacunza via pve-user <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Precedence: list
Cc: Eneko Lacunza <elacunza@binovo.es>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>,
<mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>,
<mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] win2022 +/- efi disk
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5782643956497754323=="
Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-user" <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
--===============5782643956497754323==
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-Path: <elacunza@binovo.es>
X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C553C75A1
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 09:17:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4FC1F1BC66
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 09:17:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 09:17:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42113ed334eso3897525e9.2
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=binovo.es; s=google; t=1717399042; x=1718003842; darn=lists.proxmox.com;
h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:from
:references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from
:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=Nv8HrjMqsECvvcuRK37NjGbNainG/EImp3TTwkurlec=;
b=FFbw5R1IS/pvu14JKEznC7yvl+PP6HOw/WD+gXci50bXRos3VEwlNx/qgbkqwiYRMT
6DAfasbPSQ4kTCvqtfNEoYTdTQJr5Hkgq8bwgW17ghxe8hNRw/mta9mt3VEBq3tZcdml
9NwX5femzZDoCd4Z/l18/QVcIJZubBZBiskLz6lkxE7Oo0af8qHR0qbqAbGUJY9VSTSs
po0vzMv+hZB6fBb9YpRbOcKgBghb6mN7g4QmyBm4OKxDf7mCuKqAxY4DFllLJiGNbH9p
l7uYzK0zAjJpM7ET2qHp3vZ+a6qfRx5PN4yFphTym5a7KpS71qr7DCk3G7pd/BrJYf7N
iOwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717399042; x=1718003842;
h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:from
:references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=Nv8HrjMqsECvvcuRK37NjGbNainG/EImp3TTwkurlec=;
b=LMI1/2YGzFxUfg90b9OuCmA3ZXm9+XFRIlPbyEcAsBVdCbz7FAk7NbWtWuiHJVudO6
GaoLNtH50m+4xFJWcoKwhWg4l/OmJoAB8+akS9rDy9O5JrBcg9FSZTT/+/bov/bqUbXz
0aH1pUa2sYeI7yFCZP2iMTYXDg7JwnrCCGoPxs8Ut9NYBFS/yclW8bTFsTVFYM6h1Ud3
mVvixY+OSYIMMKwID8JTjT8EOmhS43Qsx4hehZi7+iqhcDcbTqP7IQAUwx/hymzztD14
rII4aSn7nRmEXX5wqcil0AVn6m+Rfcx2hVMeo3VXu0E/qhWUxUQKw2MckaS+OBPUBu+M
VzhA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YycZWtF3cL5UNEN0j10K1i6NLESbtQFQc4dtZeH8Sb6vJGc8Ai/
nqUSePqZiGLNLvVrClmufu9gPG7obhthlgvuAHIhU0tDyuB2/LS8YYtkHJ3dh9Qj1n5sx4ciHeA
=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFqEAKtKsTgljcWb2pngu56q/b6ZnN9UJROHuea2OdRWZcn8Qsq/OKZxlIzxBf7fWJLQ9KNHg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c0a:b0:419:f4d6:5044 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4212e0a4376mr62534215e9.2.1717399042458;
Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.29.37.147] (249.red-213-96-132.staticip.rima-tde.net. [213.96.132.249])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4212b84ba40sm105706675e9.19.2024.06.03.00.17.21
for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <bbffd11e-6149-4e68-8fdf-3d0f459c3202@binovo.es>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 09:17:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] win2022 +/- efi disk
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
References: <0744b185-2d3b-4722-a1c8-6a9b388c5eef@suma-informatika.hr>
From: Eneko Lacunza <elacunza@binovo.es>
Content-Language: es-CO
In-Reply-To: <0744b185-2d3b-4722-a1c8-6a9b388c5eef@suma-informatika.hr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.130 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain
DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain
DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 -
Hi Tonci,
Have a look to mbr2efi.exe Windows tool, this is not a Proxmox issue,
but a Windows one; if you change to EFI you need to prepare Windows boot
disk for EFI boot.
Cheers
El 1/6/24 a las 14:26, Tonči Stipičević escribió:
> Hello to all,
>
> I did install win2022 VM on proxmox 8.22 without efi disk and ovmf.
>
> But , now I'm not sure any more whether this was good decision or
> not. VM works stable (I'm aware that efi or non-efi actually does
> not affect it's stability).
>
> What if sometimes this win2022 installation will need efi disk (?)
> Theoreticaly!
>
> I tried to add efi disk, change bios to ovmf, but got "no bootable
> option or device found" result .... ?!
>
>
> Is it possible at all to "import" efi disk after installation of
> no-efi-boot windows VM ?
>
>
> Thank you very much in advance
>
>
> BR
>
> Tonci
>
Eneko Lacunza
Zuzendari teknikoa | Director técnico
Binovo IT Human Project
Tel. +34 943 569 206 | https://www.binovo.es
Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2º izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun
https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO
https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/
--===============5782643956497754323==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
--===============5782643956497754323==--