From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE5731FF16F
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:38:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6A58B3853D;
	Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:38:46 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <477dc5c4-5fc6-461c-b6b6-7731d9160c3c@suma-informatika.hr>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 23:37:51 +0300
References: <mailman.95.1725643774.414.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 <477dc5c4-5fc6-461c-b6b6-7731d9160c3c@suma-informatika.hr>
To: =?utf-8?B?VG9uxI1pIFN0aXBpxI1ldmnEhw==?= <tonci@suma-informatika.hr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <mailman.254.1726432724.414.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
From: Stefan Radman via pve-user <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Precedence: list
Cc: Stefan Radman <stefan.radman@me.com>,
 Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] replication bandwith limit not respected
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6920495424526783691=="
Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-user" <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

--===============6920495424526783691==
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <stefan.radman@me.com>
X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7150AC30C7
	for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:38:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 544BC384CE
	for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:38:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from qs51p00im-qukt01071901.me.com (qs51p00im-qukt01071901.me.com [17.57.155.8])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
	for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2024 22:38:13 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai;
	t=1726432686; bh=k2k+o8XVrkzyvt24OSoJjbWj16hAMgxCmNJekMmT7P4=;
	h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To;
	b=H10T/r5n2FFqW/K7WY2K2+YbCJfFYS31Cb1zICVxN7WBcMNiODMJthpVpon9b4jdx
	 9hqyAjjznQWShk0J8bDsSB3e8D6GQ65O1ML/pxlCrM+2lsINl94jLxVYck9cvagFAD
	 MDhInwvj+f9+8cvk7+CmtVE+BZrluaqCArTxCGCiO31bVCrC/gOTDsEn7qp4OmYzAO
	 9rmJaZCwXlIyIPJZUv8i1yd2gZsy4Lw+LV/NSs94S5geRpqlaLYU6nEiaJHi2tb4PS
	 3iZDlLt1nZr8nDsL4rQh1mb5Ks7rz4VhDB5d3vj6RoDncFpjm5KaohfY1kDb7yVIaT
	 ijrXwV4NPZhxg==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (qs51p00im-dlb-asmtp-mailmevip.me.com [17.57.155.28])
	by qs51p00im-qukt01071901.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F7D1628057C;
	Sun, 15 Sep 2024 20:38:03 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] replication bandwith limit not respected 
From: Stefan Radman <stefan.radman@me.com>
In-Reply-To: <477dc5c4-5fc6-461c-b6b6-7731d9160c3c@suma-informatika.hr>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2024 23:37:51 +0300
Cc: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CCF3D6FC-EDA7-40B3-9278-F56CEA62B657@me.com>
References: <mailman.95.1725643774.414.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 <477dc5c4-5fc6-461c-b6b6-7731d9160c3c@suma-informatika.hr>
To: =?utf-8?B?VG9uxI1pIFN0aXBpxI1ldmnEhw==?= <tonci@suma-informatika.hr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6)
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 1r_y4ljgpZ3gADvsD42VnXavThVnvDkm
X-Proofpoint-GUID: 1r_y4ljgpZ3gADvsD42VnXavThVnvDkm
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard
 engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.60.29
 definitions=2024-09-15_12,2024-09-13_02,2024-09-02_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0
 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1011 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0
 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1
 engine=8.19.0-2308100000 definitions=main-2409150158
X-Apple-Remote-Links: v=1;h=KCk=;charset=UTF-8
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                    -0.633 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
	DKIM_VALID               -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	DKIM_VALID_AU            -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain
	DKIM_VALID_EF            -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain
	DMARC_PASS               -0.1 DMARC pass policy
	FREEMAIL_FROM           0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS        0.8 Email that uses ascii formatting dividers and possible spam tricks
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3       0.001 Good reputation (+3)
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL       0.001 Mailspike good senders
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record

Hi Ton=C4=8Di

> Now, two hosts are directly connected with optical patch cable =
(peer-to-peer) .. 10G

Then you should configure jumbo frames (e.g. MTU 9000) on those two =
interfaces.

Stefan

> On Sep 9, 2024, at 10:40, Ton=C4=8Di Stipi=C4=8Devi=C4=87 =
<tonci@suma-informatika.hr> wrote:
>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> this was just FYI ..  I was just about to upgrade NICs to 10G , but =
before I had to "rearrange" my VMs around my cluster and that is why I =
lowered BW down to 80MBs
>=20
> No, I  did not measured/tested the speed, haven't gone that deep, and =
this info was from network GUI graph ... it was saturated at 1Gbs
>=20
> Anyway , I remember that custom replication bandwith adjustment was =
always followed by corresponding GUI network graph presentation ... but =
like you said , maybe this lowering was to small to reflect to the =
network GUI graph
>=20
> Pretty soon I'll test it again (with 10G cards)  and write back the =
results      Now, two hosts are directly connected with optical patch =
cable (peer-to-peer) .. 10G
>=20
>    ...srda=C4=8Dan pozdrav / best regards
>=20
> Ton=C4=8Di Stipi=C4=8Devi=C4=87, dipl. ing. elektr.
> direktor / manager
>=20
> SUMA Informatika d.o.o., Badali=C4=87eva 27, OIB 93926415263
>=20
> Podr=C5=A1ka / Upravljanje IT sustavima za male i srednje tvrtke
> Small & Medium Business IT Support / Management
>=20
> mob: 091 1234003
> www.suma-informatika.hr
>=20
> 06. 09. 2024. u 19:29, pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com pi=C5=A1e:
>> Send pve-user mailing list submissions to
>> 	pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
>>=20
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> 	https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> 	pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com
>>=20
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> 	pve-user-owner@lists.proxmox.com
>>=20
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of pve-user digest..."
>>=20
>>=20
>> Today's Topics:
>>=20
>>    1. replication bandwith limit not respected (Ton?i Stipi?evi?)
>>    2. Re: replication bandwith limit not respected (Stefan Nehlsen)
>>    3. Re: replication bandwith limit not respected (Stefan Radman)
>>    4. Re: replication bandwith limit not respected (Stefan Radman)
>>    5. Re: 8.2-1 ISO doesn't boot via UEFI on usb (Bryan Fields)
>>=20
>>=20
>> =
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>=20
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 15:00:57 +0200
>> From: Ton?i Stipi?evi? <tonci@suma-informatika.hr>
>> To: PVE User List <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com>
>> Subject: [PVE-User] replication bandwith limit not respected
>> Message-ID: =
<3ee95219-6894-4ff6-a89c-9e4a8d81b74d@suma-informatika.hr>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8; format=3Dflowed
>>=20
>> Hello,
>>=20
>> I'm running latest cluster (community support)
>>=20
>> And today I've lowered replication speed down to 80MB/s? but =
replcation
>> still uses whole NIC bandwith (1G)? ... after few host restarts? =
still
>> the same
>>=20
>> 2024-09-06 14:37:31 using a bandwidth limit of 80000000 bytes per =
second
>> for transferring 'data2:subvol-1007-disk-0'
>>=20
>> Does somebody else experience that too ?
>>=20
>>=20
>> Thank you in advance
>>=20
>> BR
>>=20
>> Ton?i
>>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user



--===============6920495424526783691==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

--===============6920495424526783691==--