From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 368AB1FF29E for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:08:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EF09D186FF; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:08:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 15:08:31 +0000 To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <mailman.168.1719760115.331.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> From: Peter Eisch via pve-user <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> Precedence: list Cc: Peter Eisch <peter@boku.net> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> Subject: [PVE-User] CEPH migration from cephadm or keep cephadm? Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3357617328198174995==" Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" <pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> --===============3357617328198174995== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <peter@boku.net> X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC102BAEB8 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:08:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B14021864A for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:08:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.boku.net (mail.boku.net [204.130.132.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:08:33 +0200 (CEST) Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/ DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=boku.net; b=K+N4hlfJcQNJ4p3YvQEJ14bMOWOBNBRDkhyawReZuscOat5i+tkBZqSJXUlqNNvvi+g1vCXoyRE3RqFyJITuF7WwQlIwMmY9wbVy9mDX14ZUGU8ULWXJG+ruuImllGNJjdS5kfUjVqYE30/cmdwl5LkZZdG1+QW2ic7KgJCJPyo=; h=Received:Received:Mime-Version:Date:Content-Type:Message-ID:X-Mailer:From:Subject:To:X-Priority; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=boku.net; h=mime-version :date:content-type:message-id:from:subject:to; s=default; bh=aIe b6oNENjyQJEmq8akSeZmMAo8=; b=Lf6B8LDtQpC//Fu3ug7gB5DmJ72agU+q8Cb usry8Y1yihaEgct5SwmgLEomXxqWfvWCEHfzSuIGKvC26hv4qslpZdTAmQ35nCH1 zDe/1mBWBT60w6kPmp0Nsej6Qs0jk+X7lN6sP9M5leRMu9IMddyIs3DdzX7VdOwl 8Sbc4iY8= Received: (qmail 10519 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2024 15:08:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.boku.net) (127.0.0.1) by qmail6.boku.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 30 Jun 2024 15:08:31 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 15:08:31 +0000 Message-ID: <a43ba0d16c4b56acb1017d06304ad428@mail.boku.net> X-Mailer: AfterLogic webmail client From: "Peter Eisch" <peter@boku.net> Subject: CEPH migration from cephadm or keep cephadm? To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.999 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Hi,=0AI have a CEPH cluster where I=E2=80=99ve been doing hyperconverged = with Linux KVM. I have had no problem migrating the VMs to PVE running o= n compute-only nodes. No instances remain on the storage nodes.=0ABack t= o converged with:=0A=0A- CEPH 18.2.2=0A=0A - cephadm orchestration=0A=0A= - 6 hosts with 16 OSDs each=0A=0A - 4 hosts rocky linux=0A=0A - 1 host = PVE 8.2.2, deployed OSDs with cephadm=0A=0A - 1 host out of the cluster,= pending options=0A=0A- 4 hosts running PVE/RBD=0AIs there a way to conve= rt a cephadm CEPH cluster to PVE=E2=80=99s CEPH? Is it better to keep ce= phadm?=0AThank you for your thoughts,=0Apeter --===============3357617328198174995== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user --===============3357617328198174995==--