From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5CF51FF15F for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 12:36:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4EAB81142F; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 12:37:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 12:36:59 +0200 To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <49702fb5-5162-4a8d-8f8c-b7e82ac59be8@dkfz-heidelberg.de> <1bf05195-83a5-490c-a362-6af62b6bbdf3@dkfz-heidelberg.de> <98493398-c6a1-45e2-8d34-a0bb2d485770@dkfz-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <98493398-c6a1-45e2-8d34-a0bb2d485770@dkfz-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Post: From: Eneko Lacunza via pve-user Precedence: list Cc: Eneko Lacunza X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list List-Help: Subject: Re: [PVE-User] [Extern] - Re: "nearfull" status in PVE Dashboard not consistent Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4853683771807021403==" Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" --===============4853683771807021403== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB5ECC1890 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 12:37:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CA6CF1135C for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 12:37:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 12:37:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-374b25263a3so2372858f8f.0 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 03:37:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=binovo.es; s=google; t=1725878221; x=1726483021; darn=lists.proxmox.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:from :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rhwonIdPTXdfRWAM2rCcNLe23uqw73PAsuIWcMq9yXY=; b=DaaWcz56KsH05can3upGlUs1+zqUBjFVdsGSByYGB3Ah7d8XCwtk+KhGtuaMBuEt57 zYGSBT8OJRNVX/39EgaHyqZ1McNC+Xz7foYYh6M0THwZX0BapSn06V86cZ/OFax+o8HI tTgRMDhNeZys+Y2GjJLs09XHfWSfx8AKFRYmBttbdyQPDTjt/X+y3KjK4hSZ3kUGr10L aM2Z0GECxvF1ebc1HLv20Hzte+mZOQMfY5J+/rpOG6G60rVDATGYieO0vu27m+z+Ys6g PJPFE+0kwg3nxSg+Z5cOPPqtFTDGULgRHKAGXwls0AA0fLCAb50UuMYG+h9rfb7aoJVb 5OxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725878221; x=1726483021; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:from :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rhwonIdPTXdfRWAM2rCcNLe23uqw73PAsuIWcMq9yXY=; b=cP7+fT2yqUj05aBUyjPuZ/MhCQbcFKIGCnmMwXW5llmoj3blQMHaeOsymALgKFuPxS 66toMlmx3q8VqdStzGjfFPJHYY32vbJVAQEvNKLXODo0ZkgkrcAoZa2vNPSq1FzkdkW1 M7sw6RFzVYpnk7aH2yeiVigzlZ/x4+VMvjjUhD1Hq54p5MQbsFCp6SwNbKa0O54EUt25 EJ6k9iKW2lB1sktN/NgarGYf6wg7gYiJ9yhmlX5S8HtEVBFfIfVML97Nm2LvLBhQHJ9z tM4cvShJI0bkTid/moEtrG4DC+vxn35kwESckkwPJY1Kr6QV9Nm5Lrvn+Mn5RfbVdial 94Fw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyJ/HDG75dBQf7xZDpwwnLXeU3K6JVYuXEqL2k7lh16Xa5Wwzsu 3Bh0N5GIwUbQ/ELafDKx2Yf0dEK9VZPrf0cxzSrtWjUe6YwMe32dhu6iOkkc2ksUaRnaOaYpKJM = X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG2lpM6sgzcgltmvP02PnboCF5lznEpHre+wPTkRx/3UfoRV2Yrw5Z969ODKRf3poYSqF0ObQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5e0e:0:b0:374:af04:d6a3 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3789913417fmr3763341f8f.57.1725878221024; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 03:37:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.29.37.147] (249.red-213-96-132.staticip.rima-tde.net. [213.96.132.249]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-42caeb815f4sm73504375e9.30.2024.09.09.03.37.00 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Sep 2024 03:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 12:36:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PVE-User] [Extern] - Re: "nearfull" status in PVE Dashboard not consistent To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <49702fb5-5162-4a8d-8f8c-b7e82ac59be8@dkfz-heidelberg.de> <1bf05195-83a5-490c-a362-6af62b6bbdf3@dkfz-heidelberg.de> <98493398-c6a1-45e2-8d34-a0bb2d485770@dkfz-heidelberg.de> From: Eneko Lacunza Content-Language: es-CO In-Reply-To: <98493398-c6a1-45e2-8d34-a0bb2d485770@dkfz-heidelberg.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.134 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Hi Frank, El 8/9/24 a las 14:17, Frank Thommen escribió: >  5 hdd  3.81450   1.00000  3.8 TiB  3.3 TiB  3.1 TiB   37 MiB  8.5 > GiB  568 GiB  85.45  1.16  194      up > 16    hdd  1.90039   1.00000  1.9 TiB  1.6 TiB  1.6 TiB   19 MiB 5.4 > GiB  261 GiB  86.59  1.18   93      up Those OSD are nearfull, if you have the default 0.85 value for that. You can try to lower a bit their weight. Cheers Eneko Lacunza Zuzendari teknikoa | Director técnico Binovo IT Human Project Tel. +34 943 569 206 | https://www.binovo.es Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2º izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/ --===============4853683771807021403== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user --===============4853683771807021403==--