From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4DDB1FF162 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 21:56:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E42D331B13; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 21:56:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 14:49:39 -0500 (CDT) To: Proxmox VE user list In-Reply-To: References: <49702fb5-5162-4a8d-8f8c-b7e82ac59be8@dkfz-heidelberg.de> <1bf05195-83a5-490c-a362-6af62b6bbdf3@dkfz-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Post: From: Peter Eisch via pve-user Precedence: list Cc: Peter Eisch X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE user list List-Help: Subject: Re: [PVE-User] "nearfull" status in PVE Dashboard not consistent Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6729515792030617725==" Errors-To: pve-user-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-user" --===============6729515792030617725== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 748FEC1475 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 21:56:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4EB1A31946 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 21:56:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.boku.net (mail.boku.net [204.130.132.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 21:56:23 +0200 (CEST) Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/ DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=boku.net; b=Yr7Q7Zlyf8a4S6nijO8HAvj3SRFEK9ERnBuGTpRACMQfMiee0+iGqq5Vhn2+nwfoBmovUfz0gh4wB9yzIYLTGsT9JyRHsYxt2Jyfv33H62dR5w5b4A21f2/lhpDoPCCuCk13JjHBtEJii4AUc8GXOvGLkFHiqFJ9UBIX4ubWy4Q=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Correlation-ID; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=boku.net; h=date:from:to :cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=u06DZW7zj HodRNrmWj5iiBztnzg=; b=GVwhCj5IvU9TR8LRKIG1CbJtHtIjDfgyHFBMa5xvQ SPQhYqkzo57/Y916HQ6LPUU4M/4dLfR5KNAoWOQ2CHO4vPedjuF/VMn8ubLBzvN2 0VlAa95zCv6n30seNocMZ9Fsl/aujTCKMbnKW8e++jcQX2Q97KpTtNpB9MpP5jIc FU= Received: (qmail 16075 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2024 19:49:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dummy.faircode.eu) (peter@boku.net@172.58.13.169) by qmail6.boku.net with ESMTPA; 7 Sep 2024 19:49:41 -0000 Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 14:49:39 -0500 (CDT) From: Peter Eisch To: Proxmox VE user list Message-ID: <854037bc-bd1a-4dc7-91e7-73ccc68c73db@boku.net> In-Reply-To: References: <49702fb5-5162-4a8d-8f8c-b7e82ac59be8@dkfz-heidelberg.de> <1bf05195-83a5-490c-a362-6af62b6bbdf3@dkfz-heidelberg.de> Subject: Re: [PVE-User] "nearfull" status in PVE Dashboard not consistent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Correlation-ID: <854037bc-bd1a-4dc7-91e7-73ccc68c73db@boku.net> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [boku.net,proxmox.com] Also 'ceph osd df' would be useful to help. peter Sep 7, 2024 14:43:18 David der Nederlanden | ITTY via pve-user : > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user --===============6729515792030617725== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user --===============6729515792030617725==--