From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D9A1B247 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:19:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6FE013FFCD for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:19:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:19:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-98dfb3f9af6so82604766b.2 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 05:19:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1688041162; x=1690633162; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Qjogu3x2Y/X271k7l15TIrUNdSJr99hGbF/A64qGU3k=; b=XdBdL05ql0gdm1QVeGcaLPKS5WmpjOTpDrlKlinK18dokhFYnt3d7o2gEpOKJlqnJw oTVsSKElEB9XehxjN+1qQhGnQlaGre8jeytpSJpOlkeQiO4m6O/cUzFDiylXs2jJHrB4 P/9eXW9p+xYYG7or0p/wgi6mACCjIRIMvFnutAGyewQ4e+ETyOeUMlVJDsD/60WPeRtq 8HcpubcSFLGHwxTw4fjUMzDvbGT1+Sa0nATs2sRBmEh76wcni5CAzL4a+kYRHRIbGuJp ub6+3eWFD83VmcLT2YsOGrarlbjwGnslLnj5iGajsduFxZTn+89lWTWRqkIsqmvfZdgy AaFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1688041162; x=1690633162; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Qjogu3x2Y/X271k7l15TIrUNdSJr99hGbF/A64qGU3k=; b=emucjG1WjQfH4Ow1lsdcNiA5MxNkH/jGAZZvIBMW8A/CIJJHxJwUUiOLjARjhVlwOZ UDQamIyWY+eGAd66geLqsTXcI6m/zT/7CCz9oJbi+0LSXVqFSOLa0w2Q+gzFgalJIZ5p I7MuRyECAiiqhqoViTqPnJJ99iEgRSjQALF90OOMrYqVsvDcpqmRWn9xe5Cseza+6cUM W2wVrCEB37lLiJbrUSh2zE9Fi4HnfUnRuKnCVDm6nKyUL7pb4UCFoHoDhqyWcC/dVMtT IDf5zOGg9wD9Wd6yOnMuJyVcJ575QlPdGNvcHVQ4ez1q7xMJ87Auh5+99ImcQyQ2J8dN Q9eg== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyi42jnidpQOsdu4tIlXvP3nG2JSFLGelTKvEwBZblu5CHKud3Y heLpAtVSQl+QcYYY2TU8kV6QQmdRi2A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ71aEy3hyUniz/eal8Bptt0di/mCIlkPAbxJtTKZSw4CEjfhauHi7lPOHHWP6skbcYC8oh2mw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:31cb:b0:96f:e7cf:5015 with SMTP id xf11-20020a17090731cb00b0096fe7cf5015mr35462100ejb.17.1688041162143; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 05:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:8070:a280:2d80:5605:dbff:fe76:161d? ([2a02:8070:a280:2d80:5605:dbff:fe76:161d]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id lh8-20020a170906f8c800b009923998c8acsm2634191ejb.20.2023.06.29.05.19.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Jun 2023 05:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:19:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Reply-To: uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com Content-Language: de-DE To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=c3=bcnbichler?= , Proxmox VE user list References: <1937904473.2799.1688041029008@webmail.proxmox.com> From: Uwe Sauter In-Reply-To: <1937904473.2799.1688041029008@webmail.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.277 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -0.089 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Unable to mirror bookworm's security repo with proxmox-offline-mirror X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 12:19:29 -0000 Ah, seem like someone was faster than I to report. Thanks for the fix. Am 29.06.23 um 14:17 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler: > see https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2023-June/057946.html > >> Uwe Sauter hat am 29.06.2023 14:02 CEST geschrieben: >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> apologies if messages regarding proxmox-offline-mirror should go to another list. >> >> I'm trying to mirror the bookworm-security repository from http://security.debian.org but somehow >> proxmox-offline-mirror skips everything. The target directory only contains the files "InRelease", >> "Release" and "Release.gpg". >> >> All other configured repositories are correctly mirrored as far as I can tell. >> >> The relevant section from /etc/proxmox-offline-mirror.cfg: >> >> mirror: bookworm-security >> architectures all >> architectures amd64 >> base-dir /srv/www/debian/.mirror >> ignore-errors false >> key-path /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/debian-archive-bookworm-security-automatic.gpg >> repository deb http://security.debian.org bookworm-security main contrib non-free >> non-free-firmware >> sync true >> verify true >> >> >> Output from calling "proxmox-offline-mirror mirror snapshot create bookworm-security" is attached. >> >> Any help is appreciated as using "apt-mirror" does create a mirror that contains the currently >> available updates but I don't want to have two different tools where one suffices. >> >> >> Best, >> >> Uwe >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-user mailing list >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >