From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA91D68D64 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 09:46:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9A74C2B360 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 09:45:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id BE7382B356 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 09:45:53 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1596440747; bh=AkuURmJI63ZxKfdFZ3nnKYjh2+gseKt5ebSUB/P7ngw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=YbKrlg4/YT7jrLALSExafNAj8zvTjCsH57d3TwUzeJsa6StDC4ZFjVOTe2/KqpoxF ESdMp2u4kxFyc6tP8HEdWehwSkCMPj+L/5Iox2DAjbHyxWVPeoY0y+Xz5wB2ACJ1gH H72qTMeABiEBEX1TjKc4I/iKhpb6pIYgyJYyFcn8= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Received: from Rolands-MacBook-Pro.cybercon.de ([87.79.60.128]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFLMa-1jx3eB0eRA-00EOUQ for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 09:45:47 +0200 To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com References: <1596438669.ta6wgocjkh.astroid@nora.none> From: Roland Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 09:45:49 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1596438669.ta6wgocjkh.astroid@nora.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:3ZHHLKEpp6B+WlUV+UtVL1E2JZjB7/+TATD9zA4egglSUx/Oacq X5iUtdyX8+8goBs6uoz+61/09POq7qAO7HEmsLdputeWDzz6h5J7reD4IzOSga0K3l+VjjN ODmdEPLDwMD42+YLw32Lg+NHj6q63A+csDPZWDzgK1/nHib4Iq18ldnqLti+DxYp9FrT7wa c8Ii1aP1BzS6ZZXQfLBsQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:93jyc9Nb8oA=:9329OT2sVsuHwU5qqZ67dT BQeIIxnEQtK03tlJLBlES6AKwPxeadHrhR96py2rZVxrjese9XvX2+nnVRhAiktGB3negrZiP 7CBK2NlWOq2DmNJ64DAJ5ddTvF3zFEl3u9RodLDp6g3JCnJhxsXeZOGnDArsWvkcnKmN49srJ a+5mAqGEDN0aPHhJcBTBnUFlS6qa6LbqMkgCavOcBdoKO+cm26tBUBjGEkx7DwcFLpy/7iCza 2QwmkdS/4/YAt7DxZJfhoLzSt3HaG9g5+sNAwxtI67CcWOXGCD6Z+CTYnXlkpdsHJbC8+TYSh x91SFfzVhdboutRp4C6RHlE7xbR2SdF/AwckoMNrNBYijSA/jErUg/uXbQ/tPEhRPNMhqC12S AaUEdc+IsevFT+lFVzmD72taLg+b738knFxyQvHLuUY50/CFqLQ3t9d1TvZaJJ48zner0FsNB RBmJI3ej9WISSsuR5DuaKXXfvE59cXXY2eC/J/fiRC2f6mXYDg7CBDkG7PP9qTPCj+5G8hEeM OAWUsHEE6cf3OHCn2vaagf46Lap4ko62nHOghmkq8YKmAkCTTLHJGhFUHqp8WEn6ReTTtyGvL 1EoC3EwVnT2O6ybwbJLW/YZEJ10S4Tacs+IDaDHjaK8GZ+HnPqWUFqGEWFXMnbx34g6qZrgSg f7IJi7vzhPaT9t1mXjxskwXB7CZv5h6+klG5i8H5GxKoDdmaH7yWQXFv5ipnKc8h9+iiRNEcZ 2/Hwg2w8QBokqc3n8gsxxhlHlrSJJlOvxbhFCdrM8Qp2a/RZdfVKzSwReNdsN3FNA8HomTZt7 tXx6OR2mDz5/3AL2euoCTbphs6EHk3GCMK21LgM+pLv4U2jW+tTVmC9/E7BHr+sYgF0bH40AQ v9XU4Fr7MLNP2mYjlyYTK65JkqgFCxD8QDJrVHQYEN9464z4nxfGE5azP5jiEgODetiI6u0Ui aT13MJL2hp2KBnzeay3ftVtaxDfM2HsQA9AP4SW3jMx1iQMPpF5n7SEg0tbdgamnSls+USTnm hPVCeIpXf2CScVUePPMKUu6hlzhaA6ZE+wjxzVC4piPjzZHw/7l6uTR4R67IgQYPGcwxOUZPw WgJIxATAXn/kthYm5lzU365tLquaROxqYvvmw3Tmu1FGl5A5GxRRuE7XQvdCaXsFulGFI3bXQ MuQiUpNHVJpUkqj7M+n8QP/oojDlzsUxaTil4fNvlJeks2FiaFQ237IcEaGpAIyWyrw9u5itp g2Zxya/k9kUQ44AoZ X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider NICE_REPLY_A -1.458 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 -0.01 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL -0.01 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [PVE-User] move virtual disk with snapshots X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 07:46:24 -0000 thank you! Am 03.08.20 um 09:15 schrieb Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler: > On July 31, 2020 8:46 am, Roland wrote: >> hello, >> >> can someone explain, why it's not possible in proxmox to move a VMs >> virtual disk with snapshots to a different datastore/dir - not even whe= n >> offline? > because it only works from one storage type to the same storage type and > even then requires custom code for each storage type for a rarely used > operation. > >> we need to fix some zfs dataset/dir naming/structure and can't as we >> would loose all our snapshots when moving VMs around... > if it's all ZFS, simply zfs send/recv a baseline (can be done while VMs > are running), then poweroff and send the delta since the baseline, sed > the storage name inside the config including all snapshots, start the VM > again. with a bit of careful checking of involved VM configs before > starting, the whole process can be automated if you want. > > similar procedures, possibly with more downtime if no incremental > sync option exists, apply to other storage types as well. > > as always, test with a test VM/setup first, and do backups before just > in case. > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user >