From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8938F6263E for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:17:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7C25C25718 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:17:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.pa.ass.de (mail.pa.ass.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d1:6f3a::12:29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 828722570C for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:17:06 +0100 (CET) From: "Daniel Plominski" To: "Proxmox VE user list" Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 13:16:59 +0000 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20220110141350.716d9727@schleppmd.hlrs.de> Reply-To: "Daniel Plominski" User-Agent: eM_Client/9.0.549.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_SHORT 0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [ass.de] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox and ZFS on large JBOD ? X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 13:17:07 -0000 Hello Martin, what is the exact use case? If it is "only" about providing a robust ZFS based storage server for=20 (NFS, SMB, ISCSI), then I can only recommend TrueNAS CORE. One of our servers with 128 GB RAM handles about 3 million snapshots=20 without problems (with a complex replication structure). After about 10 years of ZFS experience, I find the ZFS implementation in=20 the FreeBSD kernel to be one of the most robust besides Solaris. If you also want to virtualize on this machine, Proxmox itself or=20 TrueNAS Scale would of course still be a possibility. For larger data server setups, however, I think the interaction between=20 the FreeBSD kernel and ZFS is better than ZFSonLinux. Mit freundlichen Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fen DANIEL PLOMINSKI Leitung IT | Head of IT Telefon 09265 808-151 | Mobil 0151 58026316 | dpl@ass.de PGP Key: https://pgp.ass.de/dpl@ass.de.asc PGP Fingerprint: 74DBC06BD9F63187C4DF8934C96585A89CFC10B3 Company Logo ASS-Einrichtungssysteme GmbH =09 ASS-Adam-Stegner-Stra=C3=9Fe 19 | D-96342 Stockheim Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Matthias Stegner, Michael Stegner, Ralph M=C3= =BCller =09 Amtsgericht Coburg HRB 3395 | Ust-ID: DE218715721 Bottom_Line