From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE17605C6 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:28:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 06D941872A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:28:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay164.nicmail.ru (relay164.nicmail.ru [91.189.117.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1CF2218718 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:27:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.28.138.148] (port=7538 helo=[192.168.8.155]) by relay.hosting.mail.nic.ru with esmtp (Exim 5.55) (envelope-from ) id 1nFA3U-0003di-DD; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 10:27:52 +0300 Received: from [62.105.41.93] (account tsabolov@t8.ru HELO [192.168.8.155]) by incarp1101.int.hosting.nic.ru (Exim 5.55) with id 1nFA3T-0002d6-Vp; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 10:27:52 +0300 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 10:27:51 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE user list References: From: =?UTF-8?B?0KHQtdGA0LPQtdC5INCm0LDQsdC+0LvQvtCy?= In-Reply-To: X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Auth: dkim=none X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.019 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 -0.001 Average reputation (+2) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Ceph df X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 07:28:30 -0000 Hello, I read the documentation before. I know this page. In the part of page placement-groups this part: *TARGET RATIO*, if present, is the ratio of storage that the administrator has specified that they expect this pool to consume relative to other pools with target ratios set. If both target size bytes and ratio are specified, the ratio takes precedence. If I understand  right I can set the Ratio =< 2 or 3 and is right ratio for this pool? I'am correct? 02.02.2022 07:43, Alwin Antreich via pve-user пишет: > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user Sergey TS The best Regard _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user